San Francisco Doesn’t Have a Homeless Problem. It Has a Substance Abuse Problem

[CrusaderFrank]

San Fran is a Progressive petri dish, and the experiment has failed.

Nope! It's worked PERFECTLY!

We have a ruling political class lording over people who will sell their kids and eat their pets

100% Success

 

[Weatherman2020]

San Fran is a Progressive petri dish, and the experiment has failed.

Nope! It's worked PERFECTLY!

We have a ruling political class lording over people who will sell their kids and eat their pets

100% Success

Lobotomy on the masses.

 

[Disir]

A political leadership problem. The House Speaker has to dodge human feces, bodies living and dead and hypodermic needles in the rare instance that she goes home to her district. The democrat party solution....sober them up long enough to get to the polls on election day.

these homeless need to be sorted out into groups. The ones who need mental health and the ones who need to go to some kind of work camp until they can save up some money. But they need to be off the streets and it seems like a growing reality leadership refuses to face

Mentally ill.
Mentally ill self medicating.
Mentally ill/Intellectual Disability and substance abuse
Intellectual Disability
Physical disability/substance abuse
Drugs/alcohol
Families

 

[Disir]

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless

Yep. Once you reach the point of homelessness and then lose your car, you're pretty much toast. Try getting a job and paying rent without one, and see how great you are then.

Or getting rolled for your paperwork. Even if you have your social security card or birth certificate there are those who will beat the living crap out of you and take it. Then EVERYTHING has to be done from scratch.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless

Yep. Once you reach the point of homelessness and then lose your car, you're pretty much toast. Try getting a job and paying rent without one, and see how great you are then.

Or getting rolled for your paperwork. Even if you have your social security card or birth certificate there are those who will beat the living crap out of you and take it. Then EVERYTHING has to be done from scratch.

How about we start executing dealers like many nations do so we can stop the flow. No one on drugs is going to improve their situation.

 

[Disir]

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless

Yep. Once you reach the point of homelessness and then lose your car, you're pretty much toast. Try getting a job and paying rent without one, and see how great you are then.

Or getting rolled for your paperwork. Even if you have your social security card or birth certificate there are those who will beat the living crap out of you and take it. Then EVERYTHING has to be done from scratch.

How about we start executing dealers like many nations do so we can stop the flow. No one on drugs is going to improve their situation.

Let's start with meth and heroin dealers. Bam! Right in the fucking forehead. Sound good?

 

[San Souci]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

Are there no Prisons? Are there no workhouses? Funny how fiction becomes FACT.

 

[Turtlesoup]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

 

[justinacolmena]

San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis.

Court-mandated counseling and therapy for addicts, but they never bring the druggers and drug dealers into federal court on drug charges for drugging poor people, do they?

 

[Weatherman2020]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

Are there no Prisons? Are there no workhouses? Funny how fiction becomes FACT.

Your quote is about charity giving.
So you think addicts make good citizens or do you think former addicts make better citizens?

Drugs are a boot on the necks of the homeless.

 

[Disir]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless

Yep. Once you reach the point of homelessness and then lose your car, you're pretty much toast. Try getting a job and paying rent without one, and see how great you are then.

Or getting rolled for your paperwork. Even if you have your social security card or birth certificate there are those who will beat the living crap out of you and take it. Then EVERYTHING has to be done from scratch.

How about we start executing dealers like many nations do so we can stop the flow. No one on drugs is going to improve their situation.

Let's start with meth and heroin dealers. Bam! Right in the fucking forehead. Sound good?

Only if it is posted on social media for all to see.

 

[Weatherman2020]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

This is what heroin does. Internally it’s worse. You’re a sick fuck for wanting to do that to people, let alone animals.

 

[Disir]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

This is what heroin does. Internally it’s worse. You’re a sick fuck for wanting to do that to people, let alone animals.
View attachment 484670

You dumbass. It's a minimal amount delivered by doctors. It's just enough for them to function.

 

[Weatherman2020]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

This is what heroin does. Internally it’s worse. You’re a sick fuck for wanting to do that to people, let alone animals.
View attachment 484670

You dumbass. It's a minimal amount delivered by doctors. It's just enough for them to function.

You lied. You’re for legalized murder as I thought.

 

[Disir]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

This is what heroin does. Internally it’s worse. You’re a sick fuck for wanting to do that to people, let alone animals.
View attachment 484670

You dumbass. It's a minimal amount delivered by doctors. It's just enough for them to function.

You lied. You’re for legalized murder as I thought.

I was mistaken. You really are a piece of shit. See ya, mother fucker.

 

[San Souci]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

Are there no Prisons? Are there no workhouses? Funny how fiction becomes FACT.

Your quote is about charity giving.
So you think addicts make good citizens or do you think former addicts make better citizens?

Drugs are a boot on the necks of the homeless.

They should have made better life choices. Tough.

 

[Weatherman2020]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

This is what heroin does. Internally it’s worse. You’re a sick fuck for wanting to do that to people, let alone animals.
View attachment 484670

You dumbass. It's a minimal amount delivered by doctors. It's just enough for them to function.

You lied. You’re for legalized murder as I thought.

I was mistaken. You really are a piece of shit. See ya, mother fucker.

For someone who first claims in the thread he’s not for legalizing drugs, then says he wants people to be injected with heroin routinely by their government masters, I’m proud to be on your shit list.

 

[Disir]

And the Left want to legalize all drugs so they can control the masses easily.


San Francisco doesn’t have a homeless problem—it has a substance-abuse crisis. And Project Roomkey, California governor Gavin Newsom’s hotels-for-homeless plan that he’s touting as a model for the rest of the country, won’t help any more than a band-aid will cure a cancer patient.

Block after block, you’ll see thousands of people who are barely alive. Some are alone; others are piled on top of one another, running into traffic, or standing slumped over, unconscious. They’ll be injecting or smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine in front of you, unaware or unfazed by your presence. Scabs cover their faces and bodies, limbs are swollen red and blue, often bloody and oozing pus. You’ll notice the garbage, rotting food, discarded drug detritus, and feces surrounding them. A shocking number are mere teenagers, but many are old or have aged well before their time.

San Francisco’s Substance-Abuse Crisis

The most important walk you can take in San Francisco is not to the grand Golden Gate bridge, down crooked Lombard Street, or to the brightly painted Victorians in Alamo Square. It’s to the city’s large and gritty sixth district, which contains the Tenderloin, Civic Center, and South of Market...

www.city-journal.org

I know you aren't going to be happy with this but I'm going to say it anyway. The problems are not just addiction. There needs to be some things that are understood. It should not be a choice between rehab/substance abuse services OR housing. That is ludicrous.

Secondly, many people don't become addicts and then become homeless. Many become addicts AFTER they become homeless because life fucking sucks. Right? You are nobody and nothing and the rest of the world is going to remind you of that daily.

Then there are the mentally ill. Whole different ball game. I promise that San Francisco is not prepared to deal with that. Biden is not prepared to deal with that either. In fact, they need to start watching very carefully where that money is going.

Oh nonsense...most have homes, get addicted and then get kicked out of their homes by their families or landlords....if they weren't addicts their families would likely allow them to stay with them but nope they are addicts and bring to much chaos for others to deal with.

No. Many of them don't have homes. This is not the homeless population of 25-30 years ago.

AND if you pretend it is than you can ignore how many are on the streets due to the current economic crisis created by the shut down.

that is nonsense---

Again, their families would allow them to move in if they were addicted asses in most cases.
to top this off, it was and is almost impossible to toss out a renter now--------the laws allowing for eviction have been "furloughed" and the government has been throwing out money like it is candy.

Nope. Not even. Addicts will take everything you got and then some. If it's not nailed down they will take it. They burn those bridges and maybe they can rebuild them when they are clean. That's why countries that have legalized heroin that has to be administered by a nurse or doctor have information that is vital for substance abuse services. The people have to fail at everything else but then they can get it. They hold down jobs and they make amends with their families. They stop stealing crap. Harm reduction when done right works as long as it's not some half ass nitwittery USA pat your self on the back shit show.

This is what heroin does. Internally it’s worse. You’re a sick fuck for wanting to do that to people, let alone animals.
View attachment 484670

You dumbass. It's a minimal amount delivered by doctors. It's just enough for them to function.

You lied. You’re for legalized murder as I thought.

I was mistaken. You really are a piece of shit. See ya, mother fucker.

For someone who first claims in the thread he’s not for legalizing drugs, then says he wants people to be injected with heroin routinely by their government masters, I’m proud to be on your shit list.

Don't kid yourself. You will never rank high enough to be on my shit list. You have demonstrated on 3 occasions in this thread that you lacked knowledge on the topic and sought to attack from an ignorant angle. You are a silly old man that can't be bothered with research or opening your mind to anything other than what someone in the media has advised you to do. Shit I don't have time for: Your shit, crazy shit, bullshit, stupid shit, fake shit and shit that has nothing to do with me.