San Jose gun control

It seems that San Jose would tax law abiding gun owners to pay for the violence incurred by criminals. Why not tax banks to cover the costs of bank robberies? Why not force politicians to take out insurance to cover the results of bad legislation?
In the case of welfare they would have to be insured for $20 trillion
 
San Jose, Mayor Sam Liccardo's 10-point plan aims to finally put long-delayed gun control steps into action, including a first-of-its-kind city ordinance that he announced in the wake of the 2019 Gilroy Garlic Festival shooting. It would require gun owners to insure their weapons and pay a fee to cover taxpayer costs associated with firearm violence.

They're coming one way or another. What may be a better plan is to have Judges, DA's and attorneys buy insurance to cover all the damage done by crooks after they're set free.

VTA shooting: San Jose mayor unveils new plan for gun liability insurance and video recorded gun sales
The proposed measures are perfectly Constitutional, none having been invalidated by the Supreme Court, and in no manner ‘violate’ the Second Amendment.
Poll tax
 

Forum List

Back
Top