Schiff: Biden Inquiry Is ‘an Evidence-Free Impeachment Proceeding’

[justoffal]

No. Any kind of actual evidence such a thing happened will do.

Why? That's not the standard Schiff used before. Why would it suddenly become important?

 

[DBA]

Are you for real?

The far-left sites these folks visit shield them from anything that could be damning to their teachings. They live in this protective bubble that keeps them on the right track. Democrats are God and Trump is the devil is pretty much all they are taught at this point.

 

[justoffal]

The far-left sites these folks visit shield them from anything that could be damning to their teachings. They live in this protective bubble that keeps them on the right track. Democrats are God and Trump is the devil is pretty much all they are taught at this point.

I just can't fathom that depth of willful ignorance.

 

[berg80]

“plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight"

Rep. Adam Schiff says "plenty of evidence" of Russia collusion hiding "in plain sight"

I think it would have been better for you to just say you can't produce such a link rather than providing one that proves my suspicion.

 

[justoffal]

I think it would have been better for you to just say you can't produce such a link rather than providing one that proves my suspicion.

Your suspicion? That man was all over national TV news for 24 months screaming from the rooftop that he had solid evidence. Having your own deitritus covering your conceal lenses may have prevented you from seeing however.

 

[berg80]

Why? That's not the standard Schiff used before. Why would it suddenly become important?

Your puerile posts do not change the fact that Schiff is right about a lack of evidence implicating Joe in any illegal activity.

 

[justoffal]

Your puerile posts do not change the fact that Schiff is right about a lack of evidence implicating Joe in any illegal activity.

Your mush brained ignorance doesn't change the fact that we are looking at a heinous double standard. It's worth noting since he decided to step on his own Dick publicly as you also do now.

 

[berg80]

Your suspicion? That man was all over national TV news for 24 months screaming from the rooftop that he had solid evidence. Having your own deitritus covering your conceal lenses may have prevented you from seeing however.

All of Schiff's claims were substantiated by the Mueller report.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday there is "plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight" regarding the Trump campaign and Russia. But he admitted that doesn't mean "there's proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal conspiracy," saying it would be up to special counsel Robert Mueller to potentially make that case.

Rep. Adam Schiff says "plenty of evidence" of Russia collusion hiding "in plain sight"

"The biggest thing that the president could do is confront Moscow to establish some kind of deterrent," said Schiff

www.cbsnews.com

 

[justoffal]

Your mush brained ignorance doesn't change the fact that we are looking at a heinous double standard. It's worth noting since he decided to step on his own Dick publicly as you also do now. Why the hell should Biden be treated any differently than Trump was?

 

[Thinker101]

Your puerile posts do not change the fact that Schiff is right about a lack of evidence implicating Joe in any illegal activity.

Sure, after all, Schiff is an expert on lack of evidence.

 

[berg80]

Your mush brained ignorance doesn't change the fact that we are looking at a heinous double standard. It's worth noting since he decided to step on his own Dick publicly as you also do now.

There is no double standard other than charges being brought against H. Biden for lying on the application form. A crime that never gets prosecuted unless there are extenuating circumstances absent in his case.

 

[berg80]

Sure, after all, Schiff is an expert on lack of evidence.

Snark doesn't change a thing about the Repub's lack of evidence.

 

[justoffal]

All of Schiff's claims were substantiated by the Mueller report.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday there is "plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight" regarding the Trump campaign and Russia. But he admitted that doesn't mean "there's proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal conspiracy," saying it would be up to special counsel Robert Mueller to potentially make that case.

Rep. Adam Schiff says "plenty of evidence" of Russia collusion hiding "in plain sight"

"The biggest thing that the president could do is confront Moscow to establish some kind of deterrent," said Schiff

www.cbsnews.com

Hahaha....such double tongued die Kuhscheiße "There's proof but there's no REAL proof...." Geezus are you a dedicated ding bat or what?

 

[justoffal]

There is no double standard other than charges being brought against H. Biden for lying on the application form. A crime that never gets prosecuted unless there are extenuating circumstances absent in his case.

The double standards herein are MASSIVE AND PLENTIFUL. The Trump hunt was and remains 100% political. There should be no surprise that once the template has been drawn it will be used by other people.

 

[justoffal]

Snark doesn't change a thing about the Repub's lack of evidence.

Who cares?

 

[DBA]

All of Schiff's claims were substantiated by the Mueller report.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday there is "plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight" regarding the Trump campaign and Russia. But he admitted that doesn't mean "there's proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal conspiracy," saying it would be up to special counsel Robert Mueller to potentially make that case.

Rep. Adam Schiff says "plenty of evidence" of Russia collusion hiding "in plain sight"

"The biggest thing that the president could do is confront Moscow to establish some kind of deterrent," said Schiff

www.cbsnews.com

And this is EXACTLY the case with Biden. There is “plenty of evidence“…”in plain sight” but it will be up to the investigative committee to determine if that proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. Just like Schiff and Democrats still believe that Trump is guilty despite Mueller’s findings, many Republicans will always believe that Joe and Hunter are guilty, regardless of the findings. See how it works?

 

[Thinker101]

Snark doesn't change a thing about the Repub's lack of evidence.

Imagine that. Lack of evidence didn't change a thing about the attacks on Trump.

 

[berg80]

Hahaha....such double tongued die Kuhscheiße "There's proof but there's no REAL proof...." Geezus are you a dedicated ding bat or what?

Does it surprise me you are intellectually incapable of distinguishing between instances of the Trump campaign's coordination with Russia in 2016 to advance his chances of winning the election and a provable criminal conspiracy? No, it doesn't.
You really should read Mueller's report as well as the Senate Intel Committee's report on Trump and Russia. You'll be surprised at what you find.

 

[berg80]

And this is EXACTLY the case with Biden. There is “plenty of evidence“…”in plain sight” but it will be up to the investigative committee to determine if that proof is beyond a reasonable doubt.

You are conflating allegations with evidence.

 

[Blaster]

The DNC has given the MSM their marching orders.