Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,033
- 56,845
- 3,615
If they can't afford a child, they should CHOOSE to not get pregnant.You do realize that if Roe is overturned, many women will not have access to abortion services. The majority of women who have abortions cite finances as one of the problems. Abortion would be outlawed in some states and the women in those states who don't have money enough to have their child are not going to have the money to travel to another state for the procedure. It is not a one day and it's all done deal. It requires more than one appointment.The SC wouldn't "outlaw abortion" if they overturn Roe.To be honest, I agree with the underlying sentiment of Chuck's statement, in that if abortion is outlawed by the Supreme Court, there will be an enormous amount of upheaval. Over half the country solidly supports legal abortion. It would be really really ugly to have that battle.I dont think threatening a SC judge is funnywill doI could certainly use some whirlwind. Let me know if you find out.
if you do please explain
BUT first, I don't know why he is pointing out Kavanaugh, because so far as I know, Kavanaugh hasn't done anything to indicate he would outlaw abortion. Second, I don't know what "price" Chuck thinks an appointed for life SC justice would pay.
He's pandering to a hyped up crowd of women who are prochoice, and he's talking tough like a lot of the guys here do. Which makes them all sound pretty stupid, imo.
Ignore him. I do.
For those people who WANT abortion outlawed, that is music to their ears. But let's not play games and pretend that the decision will not end up outlawing abortion in some states.