Science denialism: The problem that just won’t go away

[TyroneSlothrop]

[

90 years ago evolution wasn't in school curriculums. 50 years ago it was. Moron.

These are the same morons of the Scopes Monkey trial....these are neo confederate losers.......

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[jc456]

hahahahahaahahahahahahaha, and yet no science provided. Zip nadda! Call me a denier all you like, but it is the warmer with the lies.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

hahahahahaahahahahahahaha, and yet no science provided. Zip nadda! Call me a denier all you like, but it is the warmer with the lies.

its in the Bible.....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Denier" is a Cult word, no real scientist ever uses it

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[orogenicman]

The title of this thread is grossly misleading. We are not science deniers because we deny AGW. There is no real science in AGW.

And that claim is why you are a science denier.

...You can't claim to be a scientifically literate just because you believe in AGW.

I agree. But claiming that there is no science in climate change science demonstrates your scientific illiteracy.

but cuz, we've been waiting for that there science evidence,and cuz, there ain't any. how do you explain that if it is based on science?

Easy. You are a denier. End of story.

 

[Wuwei]

Amazing graph! That says it all!

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Other than 97 percent Scientific consensus about Global warming there is no science to Global warming

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Einstein denied Newtons Law of Gravity" said no real scientist ever

"Newtonian Gravity was peer reviewed and has Consensus" said no real scientist ever

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"we keep trotting out the debunked 97% of scientists believe in Global Warming, because, what did you want us to do, show an experiment that demonstrates how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can do any of the things we allege?" said the AGWCult

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

"we keep trotting out the debunked 97% of scientists believe in Global Warming, because, what did you want us to do, show an experiment that demonstrates how a 120PPM increase in CO2 can do any of the things we allege?" said the AGWCult

Sure sure sure...its in the Bible...The Heartland Institute ?
A revealing interview with top contrarian climate scientists Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian
As for the American Meteorological Society (AMS) survey,only 13% of participants described climate science as their field of expertise. The Heartland Institute – the source of the story linked in the above quote by Christy – misrepresented the associated study so badly that the AMS executive director took the unusual step ofissuing a public reprimand against their behavior. Studies of climate science experts have again and again found a 97% consensus on human-caused global warming...................................
Conspiracies and Biases
When asked about data from government agencies contradicting their contrarian beliefs about the dangers associated with climate change, Christy said,

NASA, NOAA, EPA, DOE, those are agencies. Agency leaders are appointed by the government, by the current administration. They do not represent objective independent scientific organizations. They can’t. They are appointed by the head. They try. People who come out with different views in their organizations are found to be squashed. There is an agenda in those agencies ... There are skeptics in NASA and NOAA, a good number. But they are quiet. They know in this administration, they don’t speak out.

This is an ironic answer given the recent revelations that scientists in Florida have beenbarred from using phrases like “climate change” and “global warming.”Similarly, the George W. Bush administration was accused ofcensoring government reports about climate change. It’s contrarians who have tried to squash inconvenient scientific research, not those who accept the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Heartland Institute and its NIPCC report fail the credibility test

Debunking the Heartland Institute's Efforts to Deny Climate ...

The Heartland Institute
A collection of links exposing the Heartland Institute’s bogus list of 500 skeptical scientists:

• Distinguished Scientist Calls Heartland 500 List “Offensive and Wrong”
• The Heartland Institute
• Exposed: Fake List of 500 global warming skeptics scientist
• 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts – about the Heartland Institute?
• Heartland Institute Spreads FUD & Lies About Global Warming
• Heartland Institute deniers denied by ‘U’ profs
• Top Scientists Demand Names Removed From Climate List
• Heartland “500” Still Co-Authors
• Heartland Institute publishes bogus list of 500 scientists who doubt anthropogenic climate change
• The Heartland Institute’s “500 scientist” list
• What if you held a conference, and no (real) scientists came?
• Four hundred skeptics? Try 19

 

[asterism]

Why cherry pick 1973 - 2009?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Why cherry pick 1973 - 2009?

The Gish Gallop thread is somewhere else .... put up something anything that backs your silliness...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

97% has been debunked more times than Lizzy Cheekbones fake Cherokee ancestory

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

97% has been debunked more times than Lizzy Cheekbones fake Cherokee ancestory

Link...link....link

 

[CrusaderFrank]

97% has been debunked more times than Lizzy Cheekbones fake Cherokee ancestory

Link...link....link

Popular Technology.net 97 Study Falsely Classifies Scientists Papers according to the scientists that published them

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

"The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'
What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?"

Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring 97-Percent Consensus Claims

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/18/what-else-did-the-97-of-scientists-say/

 

[jc456]

why don't you post up the total number of scientist that were in that survey. and what the questions were? Come now, let's just see what it is those folks who voted agreed on

 

[jc456]

hahahahahaahahahahahahaha, and yet no science provided. Zip nadda! Call me a denier all you like, but it is the warmer with the lies.

its in the Bible.....

and yet, still no scientific research provided. Funny, my definition of science and yours are truly two different things. Mine science states hypothesis are tested and conclusions reached, yet still no experiment that shows what 120 PPM of CO2 does to temperatures.

Wow, you know how to move around on the internet and post up funny pictures. Still isn't science pal!!!! If you're going to talk the talk, walk the walk.