Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.All of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
Often in our culture, science is rendered disposable if it stomps on a cherished claim; faith trumps reality. This attitude is internally inconsistent: Atomic theory is OK when we use it to X-ray our teeth or build a nuclear power station, but invalid when it comes to assessing the age of the planet. Evolutionary insight is OK when it guides the production of our annual flu shot, but deniers refuse to let it tell them from whence they came. Science is the way forward, but not for people who don’t want to go forward.
More at the link.
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
We dont know exactly how and when life started but the first life didn't have oxygen. So eventually plants came and started putting oxygen in the air and today we need oxygen to live.Since you want to deny facts, let me educate you on evolution.You could have just said, "I have no idea. I just parrot whatever I'm told"
Human Evolution Evidence The Smithsonian Institution s Human Origins Program
Let's start with the basics, hmmmkay
How did atoms and molecules "evolve" to form the first cells
Its very hard to explain but when you learn all the facts you realize people who deny evolution do so for bad reasons.
Are you saying that before plants there was no oxygen in the air? I don't think that's accurate. I seem to remember something about cyanobacteria.
No, it was blue-green algae the first started producing oxygen.
Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.All of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
Often in our culture, science is rendered disposable if it stomps on a cherished claim; faith trumps reality. This attitude is internally inconsistent: Atomic theory is OK when we use it to X-ray our teeth or build a nuclear power station, but invalid when it comes to assessing the age of the planet. Evolutionary insight is OK when it guides the production of our annual flu shot, but deniers refuse to let it tell them from whence they came. Science is the way forward, but not for people who don’t want to go forward.
More at the link.
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
Judging from your utter denial of climate change science, I question the truth of your claim. And pregnant dude, even if it is true that you have some modicum of science education and experience, that does not make you an expert in climate change science or even in Earth Science.
translation: "I am an entitled Bible thumper and a white man to boot...you have a lot of damn gall to have a different view than I do"....you are in a pretty cool cult too "the Bushy bearded White man God" cultTranslation: "I don't know dick about anything, but I'm in a cool Cult that get to call people "DENIERS!!!!!""
so you are a Bachmannesque creationist, end-days-type 57Frank?translation: "I am an entitled Bible thumper and a white man to boot...you have a lot of damn gall to have a different view than I do"....you are in a pretty cool cult too "the Bushy bearded White man God" cultTranslation: "I don't know dick about anything, but I'm in a cool Cult that get to call people "DENIERS!!!!!""
The white man God brought this country to the top of the heap in record time
They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.All of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
Often in our culture, science is rendered disposable if it stomps on a cherished claim; faith trumps reality. This attitude is internally inconsistent: Atomic theory is OK when we use it to X-ray our teeth or build a nuclear power station, but invalid when it comes to assessing the age of the planet. Evolutionary insight is OK when it guides the production of our annual flu shot, but deniers refuse to let it tell them from whence they came. Science is the way forward, but not for people who don’t want to go forward.
More at the link.
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
What kind of science you know?
God u dumbAll of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
Often in our culture, science is rendered disposable if it stomps on a cherished claim; faith trumps reality. This attitude is internally inconsistent: Atomic theory is OK when we use it to X-ray our teeth or build a nuclear power station, but invalid when it comes to assessing the age of the planet. Evolutionary insight is OK when it guides the production of our annual flu shot, but deniers refuse to let it tell them from whence they came. Science is the way forward, but not for people who don’t want to go forward.
More at the link.
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Here is a little bit of a tid bit for you thumpy...science is a process not a destination...moron..that is why evolution is called "the theory of evolution" not the ":fact of evolution"...so science has not been wrong it simply moved to another view after examining further data ...now if you think there is something that produces more benefits than science use it...its not gonna be religion I assure you thumpy....Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.All of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.All of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
Often in our culture, science is rendered disposable if it stomps on a cherished claim; faith trumps reality. This attitude is internally inconsistent: Atomic theory is OK when we use it to X-ray our teeth or build a nuclear power station, but invalid when it comes to assessing the age of the planet. Evolutionary insight is OK when it guides the production of our annual flu shot, but deniers refuse to let it tell them from whence they came. Science is the way forward, but not for people who don’t want to go forward.
More at the link.
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
Judging from your utter denial of climate change science, I question the truth of your claim. And pregnant dude, even if it is true that you have some modicum of science education and experience, that does not make you an expert in climate change science or even in Earth Science.
It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
Every international scientific body disagrees with you, and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
No it isn't, nit wit.
Every international scientific body disagrees with you, and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
No it isn't, nit wit.
Name one international scientific body that doesn't.Every international scientific body disagrees with you, and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
No it isn't, nit wit.
Really, you should stop. You're embarassing yourself.
Every international scientific body disagrees with you, and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
No it isn't, nit wit.
Really? You love science? So, if your position is that man is not creating the present warming, link us some informatibe credible sources with evidence for your position.All of the denialist arguments (anti-evolution, anti-global warming, etc.=anti-science) have similar fallacious arguments, and all use the same arguments that were used by the tobacco industry to deny the fact that cigarette smoking causes disease. Coincidence?
Science denialism The problem that just won t go away EARTH Magazine
The problem with you left wing nut jobs, well one of many, is that you don't actually know shit about science, you just know that this particular science agrees with you. In fact you can't stand science when it conflicts with you, such as forensic science when it proves that a young black thug tried to kill a cop.
People like me love science AND history. When you love science, you know how science works and you know science's history. When you know both of these things you know right away that climate change is most likely garbage.
Here's a little tidbit for you; historically science has been more wrong than right. Chew on that for a while.
Unlike you morons who think that all you have to do is accept AGW to feel superior, I actually am science literate and don't need to link to other people's thoughts and words. I know science, it has been my career for 32 years. I have the knowledge to think for myself.
One thing that you who don't know shit about science and therefor don't know is that I can't prove a negative. You need to prove that man is causing the warming. That is something that the AGW believers have so far failed to do.
It's one thing to blindly follow what others do and say, it's another to know enough about the subject to know if you are being taken for a ride. The important thing is that I not only know and love science, but I know and love history. When you know both, you know that AGW is a scam.
Judging from your utter denial of climate change science, I question the truth of your claim. And pregnant dude, even if it is true that you have some modicum of science education and experience, that does not make you an expert in climate change science or even in Earth Science.
Wtf? Pregnant? It's PRED not Preg, you illiterate fuck. It is because of my knowledge of science and history, that I deny AGW.
In your ignorance, you cannot distinguish between Climate Change, AGW, and Global Warming. I doubt you have the knowledge and intelligence to even be discussing the subject. All you can do is cut and paste and repeat the lie that if you don't believe in AGW then you must hate science.
Every international scientific body disagrees with you, and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
No it isn't, nit wit.
An appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
An appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
An appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
That is a logical fallacy on your part. Some appeals to authority are logical fallacies. That does not mean all appeals to authority are logical fallacies.
If the authorities really are the experts in their field, it's not a logical fallacy. It's only a fallacy when you invoke people who don't have actual expertise in the field.
Is an appeal to evidence also a fallacy?Every international scientific body disagrees with you, and the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.It is proven, you're just desperate to deny facts.They have proved it. Same way they have proved evolution is real.
What kind of science you know?
No they haven't proved it. Shows how little you know. Oh, and yes, I know that evolution is fact. You fail all around.
No it isn't, nit wit.
An appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
