abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,238
- 2,569
- Thread starter
- #21
The "science" they were covering was getting more and more political, anyway.
"Climate change" as if the earth has not endured ice ages and warming spells since time immemorial.
There's a NIV Bible and a deck of standard playing cards in the back room of all this science.
![en.wikipedia.org](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/20200324_Global_average_temperature_-_NASA-GISS_HadCrut_NOAA_Japan_BerkeleyE.svg/1200px-20200324_Global_average_temperature_-_NASA-GISS_HadCrut_NOAA_Japan_BerkeleyE.svg.png)
Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia
Opposing (The AGW Consensus)
Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.".."[28][30]
`