SERIOUS question for all Trump acolytes on this forum....

DOJ policy would not allow Mueller to indict. The congress can indict.

My, my....good friend.........That simple explanation (above) is too damn "difficult" for Trump cultists to comprehend.

Do you have any pictures and cartoons to help them?
 
True. What most Liberals lack is the willingness to use them against another human being.


I you really want to "threaten" liberals, try saying that you'll fling your dirty diapers at them......Just some friendly advice.
 
Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.
But, they were right.

All the people on the left said this was going to be a smoking gun. They all said there was collusion. They all said Trump is a puppet of Russia, which there are people on this forum still saying it to this day.

They all said "here's the truth! Trump is (insert accusation after accusation)"

And now we know for a fact...... Truth isn't truth. Giuliani was right. 'Don't believe what you're reading and seeing', and Trump was right.

So you can say that's the world we live in.... because it's the world you live in too. Jessie Smollett anyone? Don't believe what you see and hear, because the left is full of liars.

oh bullshit.

the only reason mueller wrote a declination on 'collusion' was because 'documentary' evidence had been destroyed AND he couldn't get trump to do an interview. he didn't have enough to recommend charging him with conspiracy although itprobably would have gone that way. hence the obstruction... hence he wants congress to take it up per DOJ policy.

Really? I seem to remember an email server where the information was wiped by professional data wiping software, and that didn't stop you from saying Hillary was innocent, when her only 'alibi' was that she didn't know what classified information was... you know... after being in high office for decades she couldn't tell what was classified.

Now suddenly, because "the information was destroyed" is grounds to claim he was guilty? What information are we talking about? What document proving collusion did he destroy?

Hypocrites all of you.

a small 'c' within chainmails is not the standard 'classified' markings on materials. & ummmm... panty waist jared has been outed for using 'what's app' , & couldn't get a security clearance if his life depended on it - yet donny granted one to him whilst lying that he did just that.

lol... next?

I'm confused...... what does this have to do with Hillary professionally wiping data, to prevent an investigation of it?

Nothing. So what point do you have? None. So.... lol.... next?
 
lol... it all depends on the circumstances. liberals do join the military & have gone to war...

That’s why I said most. If you folks were truly as bloodthirsty as we Conservatives are there would have been an armed insurrection in January of 2017.
 
Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.
But, they were right.

All the people on the left said this was going to be a smoking gun. They all said there was collusion. They all said Trump is a puppet of Russia, which there are people on this forum still saying it to this day.

They all said "here's the truth! Trump is (insert accusation after accusation)"

And now we know for a fact...... Truth isn't truth. Giuliani was right. 'Don't believe what you're reading and seeing', and Trump was right.

So you can say that's the world we live in.... because it's the world you live in too. Jessie Smollett anyone? Don't believe what you see and hear, because the left is full of liars.

oh bullshit.

the only reason mueller wrote a declination on 'collusion' was because 'documentary' evidence had been destroyed AND he couldn't get trump to do an interview. he didn't have enough to recommend charging him with conspiracy although itprobably would have gone that way. hence the obstruction... hence he wants congress to take it up per DOJ policy.

Really? I seem to remember an email server where the information was wiped by professional data wiping software, and that didn't stop you from saying Hillary was innocent, when her only 'alibi' was that she didn't know what classified information was... you know... after being in high office for decades she couldn't tell what was classified.

Now suddenly, because "the information was destroyed" is grounds to claim he was guilty? What information are we talking about? What document proving collusion did he destroy?

Hypocrites all of you.

a small 'c' within chainmails is not the standard 'classified' markings on materials. & ummmm... panty waist jared has been outed for using 'what's app' , & couldn't get a security clearance if his life depended on it - yet donny granted one to him whilst lying that he did just that.

lol... next?

I'm confused...... what does this have to do with Hillary professionally wiping data, to prevent an investigation of it?

Nothing. So what point do you have? None. So.... lol.... next?

That didn't happen.
 
you are the one defending him... so follow the bouncing orange ball..............
MAGA, thank God the old coot isn't our president
MAGA? Does that mean Donald resigned?
That means you lost, Jill. Move on, darling

not with everything else delving into donny's shenanigans.... besides - the inevitable multiple public hearing will shed much light on the cockroaches you got in twittler's orbit.
Whutchya got, Playtime?
Sounds like you have something that Mueller needed.

Face reality Trump lover. Your boy f-d up and Muellers report shows it.
 
MAGA? Does that mean Donald resigned?
That means you lost, Jill. Move on, darling

not with everything else delving into donny's shenanigans.... besides - the inevitable multiple public hearing will shed much light on the cockroaches you got in twittler's orbit.
Whutchya got, Playtime?
Sounds like you have something that Mueller needed.

not me... but the grand jury, SDNY & the NY AG. one guess as to who you think helped give them leads that he couldn't investigate himself due to the mandated scope of his appointment as special counsel?

Mueller referred 14 potential crimes for investigation
by Caitlin Yilek
| April 18, 2019 06:18 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office made 14 referrals of “potential criminal activity” that were outside the scope of its jurisdiction over the course of the 22-month Russia investigation.

A redacted version of Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump obstructed justice was released by the Justice Department on Thursday. It included a list of the 14 referrals, a majority of which were redacted, citing “harm to ongoing matter.”

Those that were not redacted included Trump’s former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen and Gregory Craig, a former Obama White House counsel.


“Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s Office uncovered evidence of potential wire fraud and [Federal Election Campaign Act] violations pertaining to Michael Cohen,” the report said. “That evidence was referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI’s New York Field Office.”

Grand jury investigation started by Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 10:05 PM ET, Wed March 27, 2019
Grand jury investigation started by Robert Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says - CNNPolitics

Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.
We don’t yet know what Mueller found, but here’s an overview of the president’s other legal jeopardy.

By Andrew Prokop Updated Mar 23, 2019, 9:47am EDT

No matter what special counsel Robert Mueller found, it won’t be the end of the president’s legal woes — because he, his business, and his family are in jeopardy from many other investigationS and lawsuits.

The Justice Department is digging into the Trump Organization’s role in hush money payments and the Trump inaugural committee’s finances. Congressional committees are probing everything from how Trump’s son-in-law and daughter got security clearances to Trump’s taxes. State investigators are looking into Trump’s foundation and business.
Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.

New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects
State investigators are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank on Trump projects as a result of Michael Cohen's congressional testimony.
New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects

:popcorn:
So got it....you got nuttin'
That's what I thought. Maybe's, might have's, potential's, could have's :auiqs.jpg:

He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
 
That means you lost, Jill. Move on, darling

not with everything else delving into donny's shenanigans.... besides - the inevitable multiple public hearing will shed much light on the cockroaches you got in twittler's orbit.
Whutchya got, Playtime?
Sounds like you have something that Mueller needed.

not me... but the grand jury, SDNY & the NY AG. one guess as to who you think helped give them leads that he couldn't investigate himself due to the mandated scope of his appointment as special counsel?

Mueller referred 14 potential crimes for investigation
by Caitlin Yilek
| April 18, 2019 06:18 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office made 14 referrals of “potential criminal activity” that were outside the scope of its jurisdiction over the course of the 22-month Russia investigation.

A redacted version of Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump obstructed justice was released by the Justice Department on Thursday. It included a list of the 14 referrals, a majority of which were redacted, citing “harm to ongoing matter.”

Those that were not redacted included Trump’s former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen and Gregory Craig, a former Obama White House counsel.


“Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s Office uncovered evidence of potential wire fraud and [Federal Election Campaign Act] violations pertaining to Michael Cohen,” the report said. “That evidence was referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI’s New York Field Office.”

Grand jury investigation started by Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 10:05 PM ET, Wed March 27, 2019
Grand jury investigation started by Robert Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says - CNNPolitics

Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.
We don’t yet know what Mueller found, but here’s an overview of the president’s other legal jeopardy.

By Andrew Prokop Updated Mar 23, 2019, 9:47am EDT

No matter what special counsel Robert Mueller found, it won’t be the end of the president’s legal woes — because he, his business, and his family are in jeopardy from many other investigationS and lawsuits.

The Justice Department is digging into the Trump Organization’s role in hush money payments and the Trump inaugural committee’s finances. Congressional committees are probing everything from how Trump’s son-in-law and daughter got security clearances to Trump’s taxes. State investigators are looking into Trump’s foundation and business.
Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.

New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects
State investigators are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank on Trump projects as a result of Michael Cohen's congressional testimony.
New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects

:popcorn:
So got it....you got nuttin'
That's what I thought. Maybe's, might have's, potential's, could have's :auiqs.jpg:

He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
Wow! No it doesn't.
 
Mueller wrote that his office “cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.”
This has to be the stupidest statement ever uttered by an investigator.

"We don't have any evidence, but if we did we'd have more."

:290968001256257790-final:

 
not with everything else delving into donny's shenanigans.... besides - the inevitable multiple public hearing will shed much light on the cockroaches you got in twittler's orbit.
Whutchya got, Playtime?
Sounds like you have something that Mueller needed.

not me... but the grand jury, SDNY & the NY AG. one guess as to who you think helped give them leads that he couldn't investigate himself due to the mandated scope of his appointment as special counsel?

Mueller referred 14 potential crimes for investigation
by Caitlin Yilek
| April 18, 2019 06:18 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office made 14 referrals of “potential criminal activity” that were outside the scope of its jurisdiction over the course of the 22-month Russia investigation.

A redacted version of Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump obstructed justice was released by the Justice Department on Thursday. It included a list of the 14 referrals, a majority of which were redacted, citing “harm to ongoing matter.”

Those that were not redacted included Trump’s former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen and Gregory Craig, a former Obama White House counsel.


“Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s Office uncovered evidence of potential wire fraud and [Federal Election Campaign Act] violations pertaining to Michael Cohen,” the report said. “That evidence was referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI’s New York Field Office.”

Grand jury investigation started by Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 10:05 PM ET, Wed March 27, 2019
Grand jury investigation started by Robert Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says - CNNPolitics

Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.
We don’t yet know what Mueller found, but here’s an overview of the president’s other legal jeopardy.

By Andrew Prokop Updated Mar 23, 2019, 9:47am EDT

No matter what special counsel Robert Mueller found, it won’t be the end of the president’s legal woes — because he, his business, and his family are in jeopardy from many other investigationS and lawsuits.

The Justice Department is digging into the Trump Organization’s role in hush money payments and the Trump inaugural committee’s finances. Congressional committees are probing everything from how Trump’s son-in-law and daughter got security clearances to Trump’s taxes. State investigators are looking into Trump’s foundation and business.
Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.

New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects
State investigators are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank on Trump projects as a result of Michael Cohen's congressional testimony.
New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects

:popcorn:
So got it....you got nuttin'
That's what I thought. Maybe's, might have's, potential's, could have's :auiqs.jpg:

He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
Wow! No it doesn't.

Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
 
Whutchya got, Playtime?
Sounds like you have something that Mueller needed.

not me... but the grand jury, SDNY & the NY AG. one guess as to who you think helped give them leads that he couldn't investigate himself due to the mandated scope of his appointment as special counsel?

Mueller referred 14 potential crimes for investigation
by Caitlin Yilek
| April 18, 2019 06:18 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office made 14 referrals of “potential criminal activity” that were outside the scope of its jurisdiction over the course of the 22-month Russia investigation.

A redacted version of Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump obstructed justice was released by the Justice Department on Thursday. It included a list of the 14 referrals, a majority of which were redacted, citing “harm to ongoing matter.”

Those that were not redacted included Trump’s former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen and Gregory Craig, a former Obama White House counsel.


“Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s Office uncovered evidence of potential wire fraud and [Federal Election Campaign Act] violations pertaining to Michael Cohen,” the report said. “That evidence was referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI’s New York Field Office.”

Grand jury investigation started by Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 10:05 PM ET, Wed March 27, 2019
Grand jury investigation started by Robert Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says - CNNPolitics

Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.
We don’t yet know what Mueller found, but here’s an overview of the president’s other legal jeopardy.

By Andrew Prokop Updated Mar 23, 2019, 9:47am EDT

No matter what special counsel Robert Mueller found, it won’t be the end of the president’s legal woes — because he, his business, and his family are in jeopardy from many other investigationS and lawsuits.

The Justice Department is digging into the Trump Organization’s role in hush money payments and the Trump inaugural committee’s finances. Congressional committees are probing everything from how Trump’s son-in-law and daughter got security clearances to Trump’s taxes. State investigators are looking into Trump’s foundation and business.
Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.

New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects
State investigators are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank on Trump projects as a result of Michael Cohen's congressional testimony.
New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects

:popcorn:
So got it....you got nuttin'
That's what I thought. Maybe's, might have's, potential's, could have's :auiqs.jpg:

He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
Wow! No it doesn't.

Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
You going down those rabbit trails do nothing to further the conversation and you're entirely wrong on the one item that was part of this conversation.
 
WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???
Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump
You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump
BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...
READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......
READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.
Mueller:
The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.

According to Mueller, the evidence isn't there to prosecute the average someone for Obstruction, much less a sitting President.
 
not me... but the grand jury, SDNY & the NY AG. one guess as to who you think helped give them leads that he couldn't investigate himself due to the mandated scope of his appointment as special counsel?

Mueller referred 14 potential crimes for investigation
by Caitlin Yilek
| April 18, 2019 06:18 PM

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office made 14 referrals of “potential criminal activity” that were outside the scope of its jurisdiction over the course of the 22-month Russia investigation.

A redacted version of Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump obstructed justice was released by the Justice Department on Thursday. It included a list of the 14 referrals, a majority of which were redacted, citing “harm to ongoing matter.”

Those that were not redacted included Trump’s former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen and Gregory Craig, a former Obama White House counsel.


“Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s Office uncovered evidence of potential wire fraud and [Federal Election Campaign Act] violations pertaining to Michael Cohen,” the report said. “That evidence was referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI’s New York Field Office.”

Grand jury investigation started by Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 10:05 PM ET, Wed March 27, 2019
Grand jury investigation started by Robert Mueller 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says - CNNPolitics

Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.
We don’t yet know what Mueller found, but here’s an overview of the president’s other legal jeopardy.

By Andrew Prokop Updated Mar 23, 2019, 9:47am EDT

No matter what special counsel Robert Mueller found, it won’t be the end of the president’s legal woes — because he, his business, and his family are in jeopardy from many other investigationS and lawsuits.

The Justice Department is digging into the Trump Organization’s role in hush money payments and the Trump inaugural committee’s finances. Congressional committees are probing everything from how Trump’s son-in-law and daughter got security clearances to Trump’s taxes. State investigators are looking into Trump’s foundation and business.
Mueller is done. Trump’s legal woes aren’t.

New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects
State investigators are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank on Trump projects as a result of Michael Cohen's congressional testimony.
New York attorney general subpoenas banks about Trump projects

:popcorn:
So got it....you got nuttin'
That's what I thought. Maybe's, might have's, potential's, could have's :auiqs.jpg:

He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
Wow! No it doesn't.

Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
You going down those rabbit trails do nothing to further the conversation and you're entirely wrong on the one item that was part of this conversation.

I am the one who is right. Try reading the report. For you're the one going down trails trying to pretend the report says what you want to believe.
 
WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???
Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump
You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump
BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...
READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......
READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.
Mueller:
The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.

According to Mueller, the evidence isn't there to prosecute the average someone for Obstruction, much less a sitting President.

That is incorrect.
 
So got it....you got nuttin'
That's what I thought. Maybe's, might have's, potential's, could have's :auiqs.jpg:

He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
Wow! No it doesn't.

Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
You going down those rabbit trails do nothing to further the conversation and you're entirely wrong on the one item that was part of this conversation.

I am the one who is right. Try reading the report. For you're the one going down trails trying to pretend the report says what you want to believe.
I have no question you think your right, IM2.
That does not make it right.
 
He's got 14 crimes committed by Trump. We are going to treat this like you conservatives do. The mention of a crime means a crime was committed. That's how your side does it and you don't get to play by different rules than everyone else.
Wow! No it doesn't.

Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
You going down those rabbit trails do nothing to further the conversation and you're entirely wrong on the one item that was part of this conversation.

I am the one who is right. Try reading the report. For you're the one going down trails trying to pretend the report says what you want to believe.
I have no question you think your right, IM2.
That does not make it right.

It does when I am reading the report.
 
Wow! No it doesn't.

Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
You going down those rabbit trails do nothing to further the conversation and you're entirely wrong on the one item that was part of this conversation.

I am the one who is right. Try reading the report. For you're the one going down trails trying to pretend the report says what you want to believe.
I have no question you think your right, IM2.
That does not make it right.

It does when I am reading the report.
Of course it does...I would never question that you don't think that.
 
Yes it does. Because there is no evidence that was shown the first time it was investigated that Obama spied on Trump but you cult members actually believe Obama spied on Trump. It was shown that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium 1 but you cult members claim she did based only on a suggestion. He Mueller has described 14 different incidents with testimonies.
You going down those rabbit trails do nothing to further the conversation and you're entirely wrong on the one item that was part of this conversation.

I am the one who is right. Try reading the report. For you're the one going down trails trying to pretend the report says what you want to believe.
I have no question you think your right, IM2.
That does not make it right.

It does when I am reading the report.
Of course it does...I would never question that you don't think that.

Gaslighting doesn't work here Meister and that's all you got.

Read the report.
 

Forum List

Back
Top