Conservative
Type 40
- Jul 1, 2011
- 17,082
- 2,054
I see a lot of jealousy on the left. sad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More noise from the basement!!
Good work if you can get it...
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
Except Romney wasn't a "former" CEO, he was the actual CEO according to documents he signed
Explain that one.
Explain it in a way that doesn't sound like total bullshit to the common man Mittens needs to reach out to in order to win.
Sure, that's easy. Your own words: "If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing."
Your own words.
If it is indeed true, as you said, then it makes sense.
.
So what you're telling me is, while technically and legally the companies CEO - he was actually only a paid spokesman - to the tune of 100k? Well do we have any evidence he actually executed the duties of his job as spokesman?
And tell me this - if Obama had been a paid spokesman for a company that was shipping American jobs overseas - would it look bad?
EDIT - and just out of curiosity, if your company retained such an ex-CEO to talk up the company - and I have no doubt that's done by many other companies, don't get me wrong - would he be paid as a sub-contractor, or would he be an actual payroll employee? I'm just curious - will be good to know when Mittens finally releases his taxes.
Michelle Obama had TWO $100k jobs for doing nothing given to her as soon as her husband was elected Senator....no paybacks there I am sure - right?
So is this the new slogan of the Republican party:
"The Republican Party, not any worse than the Democratic Party!"
Yeah, good luck winning on that one! ...
Oh...so the slogan of the Democrat party is "we are a little worse than the Republican Party"?
Good luck with that also.
Obamaturd got paid how much? He has done nothing but screw this country, so your point is worthless as usual.Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
I see a lot of jealousy on the left. sad.
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
"Despite months of negative advertising from Mr. Obama and his Democratic allies seeking to further define Mr. Romney as out of touch with the middle class and representative of wealthy interests, the poll shows little evidence of any substantial nationwide shift in attitudes about Mr. Romney."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/u...ndercutting-obama-support.html?pagewanted=all
100k to do NOTHING?
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.com
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
"Despite months of negative advertising from Mr. Obama and his Democratic allies seeking to further define Mr. Romney as out of touch with the middle class and representative of wealthy interests, the poll shows little evidence of any substantial nationwide shift in attitudes about Mr. Romney."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/u...ndercutting-obama-support.html?pagewanted=all
Why would the party of "what I know to be true in my heart" be swayed by "facts and evidence" ?
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
100k to do NOTHING?
Translation: "I'm jealous of Mitt Romney's success and therefore hate him and accuse him of being a bad person."
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romneys state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain executive in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romneys state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain executive in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!
Are you accusing him of acting like Michelle Obama. He Built Bain, He had an interest in it. Good try though.
Mitt Romney stayed at Bain 3 years longer than he stated - Boston.comAlso, a Massachusetts financial disclosure form Romney filed in 2003 states that he still owned 100 percent of Bain Capital in 2002. And Romney’s state financial disclosure forms indicate he earned at least $100,000 as a Bain “executive” in 2001 and 2002, separate from investment earnings.
If it is indeed true that Mitt had nothing to do with Bain capital in 2001 and 2002 - that means he was paid 100k salary to do nothing.
100k to do NOTHING?
Sorry but that beats even the most inefficient government employee! Looks like private business can indeed be less efficient than government!