Sex, Love, and the between

[crazyme]

Sex is physical. Love is emotional.

A person can fulfill their physical desires just as easily as they can fulfill their thirst.
Emotional desires being fulfilled are a bit more difficult to get fulfilled.

But what about the person who doesn't care to have their emotional parts fulfilled? Why is it seen as wrong for them to actively and contently live fulfilling their physical desires until an emotional fulfillment might come around?

The lack in this idea might be this.

Although physical desires are only physical and any persons desiring to fulfill physical desires, if they are fine and content with it, could be absolutely fine with it, it has a tendency to become more than just a passing fulfilling, or temperance. Moderation is a balance. Temperance is a balance.

When a person seeks to eat or drink or sleep whenever they desire and is allowed to, this form of living forms a 'need', an addiction. And when a person becomes 'addicted', their whole life is thrown off balance.

So it isn't in fulfilling physical needs or desires. It's in the formations of addictions that is the concern.

 

[rightwinger]

So you want to fuk for fun

Nothing wrong with that

 

[Moonglow]

My emotional needs are rescued by having casual sex...

 

[JoeMoma]

If you want true love, get a dog. If you want sex, get a pussy.

 

[Unkotare]

Sex is physical. Love is emotional. .....

Your fabricated distinctions diminish both.

 

[crazyme]

and don't forget... yes, we all at one point become the elderly.. The ones who lived righteous lives to a good elderly experience. The ones who lived unrighteously, to not so good elderly experiences. You may not believe in the here after with its set of 'rewards', but Nature has a way for providing for the 'rewards' here on Earth.