Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Communists don't exist, because Communism is impossible to implement, and has never been practiced in the history of the world. It's a meaningless title. A far more appropriate term is "Socialist", since that's the direction the Democratic party has been heading since Obama was elected. Take your flummery back to the Flame Zone.All of that mounting evidence that doesn't exist. The FBI said there is no evidence, the voting machines are offline, and the CIA has no components for investigating cyber crimes.After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
All it did was confirm what we knew.The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
We already knew that the MSM was sharing their questions with the Democrat candidates, so it didn't matter that the emails were hacked. The problem here is the MSM being a propaganda arm of the DNC. If they weren't, they either wouldn't have been hacked, or wouldn't have cared, because they'd have nothing to hide.It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
Didn't bother you when it was Hillary. Is it because she had a D next to her name?Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
I notice no one is calling liberals communists anymore. Why is that? What a bunch of fuck ups you deplorables are.
Brazille was a party official at that time?
I believe so. When all of the DNC racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic e-mails were exposed, she was in the heart of it...and was quietly 'let go' / moved.
When it was exposed, yes.
But NOT when she passed debate questions to Hillary/
What debate questions? Please provide "credible" proof of exactly what questions Brazile shared with Hillary. My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water. You mean you actually think Hillary didn't think she would be asked a question about Flint water in Flint? Really? Oh, and how does that compare with Russia hacking the DNC to help Trump win the election - and then making that information public?
The president-elect suggested the Kremlin did the U.S. a favor if it meddled in our election.
After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
More: SHAMELESS: TRUMP NOW GLOATING ABOUT ELECTION HACK
Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
Brazille was a party official at that time?
I believe so. When all of the DNC racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic e-mails were exposed, she was in the heart of it...and was quietly 'let go' / moved.
When it was exposed, yes.
But NOT when she passed debate questions to Hillary/
What debate questions? Please provide "credible" proof of exactly what questions Brazile shared with Hillary. My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water. You mean you actually think Hillary didn't think she would be asked a question about Flint water in Flint? Really? Oh, and how does that compare with Russia hacking the DNC to help Trump win the election - and then making that information public?
Doesn't matter if it was one, or one hundred, does it?My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water.
Communists don't exist, because Communism is impossible to implement, and has never been practiced in the history of the world. It's a meaningless title. A far more appropriate term is "Socialist", since that's the direction the Democratic party has been heading since Obama was elected. Take your flummery back to the Flame Zone.All of that mounting evidence that doesn't exist. The FBI said there is no evidence, the voting machines are offline, and the CIA has no components for investigating cyber crimes.After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
All it did was confirm what we knew.The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
We already knew that the MSM was sharing their questions with the Democrat candidates, so it didn't matter that the emails were hacked. The problem here is the MSM being a propaganda arm of the DNC. If they weren't, they either wouldn't have been hacked, or wouldn't have cared, because they'd have nothing to hide.It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
Didn't bother you when it was Hillary. Is it because she had a D next to her name?Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
I notice no one is calling liberals communists anymore. Why is that? What a bunch of fuck ups you deplorables are.
Both candidates were pretty much hated by the entire world.Brazille was a party official at that time?
I believe so. When all of the DNC racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic e-mails were exposed, she was in the heart of it...and was quietly 'let go' / moved.
When it was exposed, yes.
But NOT when she passed debate questions to Hillary/
What debate questions? Please provide "credible" proof of exactly what questions Brazile shared with Hillary. My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water. You mean you actually think Hillary didn't think she would be asked a question about Flint water in Flint? Really? Oh, and how does that compare with Russia hacking the DNC to help Trump win the election - and then making that information public?
They are comparing her to a cocksocket who is hated by the entire world except themselves.
I guess we should not care about what Donna Brazile did...right ?
I mean....it's not O.K. to find that out....right ?
Donna Brazile coached some questions for a debate. This asshole you are sucking up to has the nuclear code, you dumb fuck. Right?
All of that mounting evidence that doesn't exist. The FBI said there is no evidence, the voting machines are offline, and the CIA has no components for investigating cyber crimes.After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
All it did was confirm what we knew.The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
We already knew that the MSM was sharing their questions with the Democrat candidates, so it didn't matter that the emails were hacked. The problem here is the MSM being a propaganda arm of the DNC. If they weren't, they either wouldn't have been hacked, or wouldn't have cared, because they'd have nothing to hide.It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
Didn't bother you when it was Hillary. Is it because she had a D next to her name?Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
I notice no one is calling liberals communists anymore. Why is that? What a bunch of fuck ups you deplorables are.
As Don Rickles would say, "get the jew."The president-elect suggested the Kremlin did the U.S. a favor if it meddled in our election.
After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
More: SHAMELESS: TRUMP NOW GLOATING ABOUT ELECTION HACK
Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.Brazille was a party official at that time?But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
didnt Brazile take over the interime chair of the DNC when the redhead was forced to resign?
Brazille was a party official at that time?
I believe so. When all of the DNC racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic e-mails were exposed, she was in the heart of it...and was quietly 'let go' / moved.
When it was exposed, yes.
But NOT when she passed debate questions to Hillary/
What debate questions? Please provide "credible" proof of exactly what questions Brazile shared with Hillary. My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water. You mean you actually think Hillary didn't think she would be asked a question about Flint water in Flint? Really? Oh, and how does that compare with Russia hacking the DNC to help Trump win the election - and then making that information public?
They are comparing her to a cocksocket who is hated by the entire world except themselves.
LWNJ';s - Please provide some of the "mounting evidence" you speak of.
Keep in mind - "Evidence" is not "unnamed sources" and non corroborated stories.
I'll wait.
Yeah, what happened to them? They've been very very quiet. Maybe, just maybe, their allegations were false?I'm sure the Groper Elect thinks he was doing those women he groped a favor too.
Brazille was a party official at that time?
I believe so. When all of the DNC racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic e-mails were exposed, she was in the heart of it...and was quietly 'let go' / moved.
When it was exposed, yes.
But NOT when she passed debate questions to Hillary/
What debate questions? Please provide "credible" proof of exactly what questions Brazile shared with Hillary. My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water. You mean you actually think Hillary didn't think she would be asked a question about Flint water in Flint? Really? Oh, and how does that compare with Russia hacking the DNC to help Trump win the election - and then making that information public?Doesn't matter if it was one, or one hundred, does it?My understanding is that it was ONE question about Flint water before Hillary gave a speech in Flint on Flint water.
Doesn't matter if it was an obvious question or not, does it?
It happened, and it can't be reversed.
So, do you have access to national security data from 17 national security agencies? Damn, I'm impressed. You must be very special.
So, do you have access to national security data from 17 national security agencies? Damn, I'm impressed. You must be very special.
There's no data confirming the Ivans hacked Podesta or the DNC to help Trump, fool. I'll add that I've run into more CIA personnel than you have,(zero) I was briefly deployed to Langley in 1969. I know they don't get involved in domestic anything because they are specifically chartered not to. And that if they had something to say about russia, it would be told to the president's DNI and specific Congressional committees, not the NYTimes. You deserve none of this reply seeing as you're a partisan hysteric who couldn't care less what the truth is.
I'm sure the Groper Elect thinks he was doing those women he groped a favor too.
In order for a system to be Communist, it must have no government, no currency, and no Social classes, according to the Communist Manifesto. No Nation has ever fit the definition. Russia was Socialist.Communists don't exist, because Communism is impossible to implement, and has never been practiced in the history of the world. It's a meaningless title. A far more appropriate term is "Socialist", since that's the direction the Democratic party has been heading since Obama was elected. Take your flummery back to the Flame Zone.All of that mounting evidence that doesn't exist. The FBI said there is no evidence, the voting machines are offline, and the CIA has no components for investigating cyber crimes.After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
All it did was confirm what we knew.The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
We already knew that the MSM was sharing their questions with the Democrat candidates, so it didn't matter that the emails were hacked. The problem here is the MSM being a propaganda arm of the DNC. If they weren't, they either wouldn't have been hacked, or wouldn't have cared, because they'd have nothing to hide.It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
Didn't bother you when it was Hillary. Is it because she had a D next to her name?Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
I notice no one is calling liberals communists anymore. Why is that? What a bunch of fuck ups you deplorables are.
Ahahahahaaaaa....So you've been to Russia and China and know this? Or more garbage from fake news?
Take your juvenile anime cartoons and put 'em up your flummery.
The president-elect suggested the Kremlin did the U.S. a favor if it meddled in our election.
After spending weeks denying the mounting evidence that Russia played a role in cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, Donald Trump employed a new tactic Friday.
The president-elect suggested that whoever stole tens of thousands of emails from top Democratic officials and leaked them online was actually doing America a favor.
It’s unclear what prompted Trump to pose this question to his 17 million Twitter followers at six o’clock in the morning. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
What is clear is that the hacking to which Trump was referring was the same Russian state-sponsored attack that he’s repeatedly downplayed and dismissed. It showed that Donna Brazile, then interim chair of the DNC, shared a primary debate question with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, ahead of a March debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Trump’s tweet was worrisome for several reasons, least of which is that Brazile did not do anything “illegal” by sharing the question with Clinton. It was certainly unethical. But there is no law governing what a party official can do with questions if they receive them ahead of a primary debate.
The bigger problem with Trump’s tweet, however, is that he’s asking Americans to view this massive cyber-espionage campaign ― in which Russian hackers also targeted Republican political committees, candidates and campaign staff ― as some kind of public service to America, because it “revealed” that Brazile had shared a debate question.
More: SHAMELESS: TRUMP NOW GLOATING ABOUT ELECTION HACK
Trump has no shame - or honor, integrity, or any other redeeming qualities. The man-baby is an empty suit. The future of America clearly hinges on how the electors vote on Monday.
