SHARE THIS: CNN Debate Poll: 58% Hillary Supporters

Now you know why the CNN poll shows Hillary to be the winner. Gosh, are we ever shocked!

CNN Debate Poll: 58% Were Hillary Clinton Supporters

CNN's own ORC opinion poll immediately following the second presidential debate on October 9 stunned pundits and viewers, who almost unanimously declared either a draw or Trump the winner, when it showed 57% of respondents declaring Hillary Clinton the winner. However, the problem with the poll was blatantly declared live on CNN and on their news pages along with the stunning results.

Out of the poll's 537 participants, 311 declared themselves supporters of Hillary Clinton.

That figures. Standard Dem MO.
 
That makes the case in and of itself. Of course Clinton supporters are in the majority.
You really are a pathetic douche

Don't worry more polls will come out next in couple of days.......... The result will the same in favor of Hillary......

As in this poll, not influenced by her big money?

mBC014.jpg
 
That makes the case in and of itself. Of course Clinton supporters are in the majority.
You really are a pathetic douche

Don't worry more polls will come out next in couple of days.......... The result will the same in favor of Hillary......

If they over sample likely to vote Hillary supporters that's why polls say Hillary is in the lead.

To get an accurate poll they must sample equal amounts of likely to vote Hillary and likely to vote Trump, if a poll oversamples the Hillary side by 5% or 6% etc then logic dictates that Hillary will lead the poll.
 
Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork

"Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork"

borrel-cnn-ocbs-clinton-broadcasting-clinton-news-network-network-aoc-3446969.png

Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

No wonder they side with Clinton, she pours millions and millions into them. They are one of her biggest donors too, no surprise.

If she wins, your lives will be handed to them... her corporate masters.
 
Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork

"Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork"

borrel-cnn-ocbs-clinton-broadcasting-clinton-news-network-network-aoc-3446969.png

Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

Also it says that the highest political office in America can just be bought, that the media is bought and the Oval Office can be bought and that cannot be a good thing, it also shows that they essentially hold the voting public in disrespect and contempt.
 
Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork

"Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork"

borrel-cnn-ocbs-clinton-broadcasting-clinton-news-network-network-aoc-3446969.png

Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

Also it says that the highest political office in America can just be bought, that the media is bought and the Oval Office can be bought and that cannot be a good thing, it also shows that they essentially hold the voting public in disrespect and contempt.

Exactly. Due to our long national exercise in commodity fetishism, we don't elect a candidate ---- we buy a product.
 
Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork

"Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork"

borrel-cnn-ocbs-clinton-broadcasting-clinton-news-network-network-aoc-3446969.png

Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

No wonder they side with Clinton, she pours millions and millions into them. They are one of her biggest donors too, no surprise.

If she wins, your lives will be handed to them... her corporate masters.

They don't "side with" anyone -- they "side with" making money. That's what commercial enterprise EXISTS for.
Nobody makes a dime by taking an ideological stance. They make them by ensnaring your attention so they can sell you shit you don't need.
 
Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork

"Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork"

borrel-cnn-ocbs-clinton-broadcasting-clinton-news-network-network-aoc-3446969.png

Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

No wonder they side with Clinton, she pours millions and millions into them. They are one of her biggest donors too, no surprise.

If she wins, your lives will be handed to them... her corporate masters.

They don't "side with" anyone -- they "side with" making money. That's what commercial enterprise EXISTS for.
Nobody makes a dime by taking an ideological stance. They make them by ensnaring your attention so they can sell you shit you don't need.

And yet you are a drone repeating their opinions... for their profit. Funny how that works.
 
Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

Well, given the fact that Fox is number one in cable news, wouldn't all news agencies be right-wing (as you might call them) to try and gain Fox news market share?

Seems to me that if media takes "commercial sides" then Fox would be one of many instead of being alone.
 
If they over sample likely to vote Hillary supporters that's why polls say Hillary is in the lead.

To get an accurate poll they must sample equal amounts of likely to vote Hillary and likely to vote Trump, if a poll oversamples the Hillary side by 5% or 6% etc then logic dictates that Hillary will lead the poll.

Polls don't mean a thing unless those who were polled actually go out and vote.

The enthusiasm right now rides with Trump. This is evident by the crowds he draws compared to Hillary.
 
If they over sample likely to vote Hillary supporters that's why polls say Hillary is in the lead.

To get an accurate poll they must sample equal amounts of likely to vote Hillary and likely to vote Trump, if a poll oversamples the Hillary side by 5% or 6% etc then logic dictates that Hillary will lead the poll.

Polls don't mean a thing unless those who were polled actually go out and vote.

The enthusiasm right now rides with Trump. This is evident by the crowds he draws compared to Hillary.

This is the only poll that hasn't consistently over sampled likely to vote Hillary, the samples are equal between Hillary and Trump and Trump has now lead this poll for exactly one month. The poll samples 3,000 people and not a few hundred.

With polls the larger the sample of people, equal amounts sampled, the more accurate the poll.

la-times-usc-poll-oct-10.jpg


The USC Dornsife / LA Times Presidential Election "Daybreak" Poll | Understanding America Study

"The enthusiasm right now rides with Trump. This is evident by the crowds he draws compared to Hillary."

We agree.
 
Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

Well, given the fact that Fox is number one in cable news, wouldn't all news agencies be right-wing (as you might call them) to try and gain Fox news market share?

Seems to me that if media takes "commercial sides" then Fox would be one of many instead of being alone.

Once again -- Fox Noise doesn't make its ratings by taking a side. Nobody does. Fox does it by selling Fear and Loathing. A continuous colostomy bag of scary-black-man and paranoid conspiracy stories trumpeted from garishly colored studios with sleazy suggestive chyrons running across the screen like a kid on Ritalin, delivered by angry old white guys pounding on the desk sandwiched in between models in short skirts while the graphics go wwwhhhoooosh. That's what sells. The medium is the message.
 
Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork

"Fair and Balanced!

The Clinton News Netowork"

borrel-cnn-ocbs-clinton-broadcasting-clinton-news-network-network-aoc-3446969.png

Haha, that's funny. Unfortunately this isn't Germany and we don't have media that takes political sides. We have media that takes commercial sides. It sucks.

No wonder they side with Clinton, she pours millions and millions into them. They are one of her biggest donors too, no surprise.

If she wins, your lives will be handed to them... her corporate masters.

They don't "side with" anyone -- they "side with" making money. That's what commercial enterprise EXISTS for.
Nobody makes a dime by taking an ideological stance. They make them by ensnaring your attention so they can sell you shit you don't need.

And yet you are a drone repeating their opinions... for their profit. Funny how that works.

I'm describing how they work, and yes it is exactly for profit. Completely.
"Opinion" doesn't even enter into it. Their only "opinion" is --- "you (the viewer) have money, and we want it".
 

Forum List

Back
Top