She Laughed Lied And Demeaned The Victim

[Statistikhengst]

lawyers have to do their jobs and they must do them to the best of their ability, it's the law.

so this is a petty dig up

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

 

[Oldstyle]

Did she find it amusing that she got a man who raped a 12 year old off with a 2 month sentence, Winger? If you listen to that recording...it sure seems that way.

It seemed to me that she was proud of the successful job she did for her client.

No question about that, Tipsy...the problem is...her client raped a 12 year old. Would you be proud getting someone like that off with time served? Between you and me...if I had done such a thing...I wouldn't be proud of it and I certainly wouldn't brag about it to others.

 

[Oldstyle]

lawyers have to do their jobs and they must do them to the best of their ability, it's the law.

so this is a petty dig up

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

 

[Statistikhengst]

lawyers have to do their jobs and they must do them to the best of their ability, it's the law.

so this is a petty dig up

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

 

[Oldstyle]

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

I don't know what's sadder, Stats...that you never heard the tape recording in the first place...or that you need someone to link it for you now because you seem to be to lazy to do so yourself?


Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

I don't know what's sadder, Stats...that you never heard the tape recording in the first place...or that you need someone to link it for you now because you seem to be to lazy to do so yourself?


Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

Hmmmm, looks like you drew a blank, there...

 

[DarkFury]

lawyers have to do their jobs and they must do them to the best of their ability, it's the law.

so this is a petty dig up

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

Check the video IN the OP.
It's there. AND you can track it back to Youtube.
OR....
The Audio...


She was in 1980 still quite PROUD of getting a child molester off.
She destroyed the 12 year old to boot.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Listen to Hillary Clinton Laugh While Talking About Getting a Suspected Child Rapist Off the Hook TheBlaze.com

there ya go.

 

[Oldstyle]

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

I don't know what's sadder, Stats...that you never heard the tape recording in the first place...or that you need someone to link it for you now because you seem to be to lazy to do so yourself?


Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

Hmmmm, looks like you drew a blank, there...

Quite frankly, Stats...I'm not sure what's more embarrassing...you never hearing the recording in the first place...or you not having the ability to find it without a link now?

 

[Care4all]

Doesn't sound like Hillary to me??? I couldn't hear what was being said, the tape kept going in and out...but the words that were recognized...this woman speaking is a southerner....was Hillary born in the South?

Can you discern what is being asked and answered? I am on my Kindle and maybe my internet connection isn't good?

 

[Statistikhengst]

lawyers have to do their jobs and they must do them to the best of their ability, it's the law.

so this is a petty dig up

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

Check the video IN the OP.
It's there. AND you can track it back to Youtube.
OR....
The Audio...


She was in 1980 still quite PROUD of getting a child molester off.
She destroyed the 12 year old to boot.

So, I listened to it. TWICE.

Clinton laughs right before the 2 minute mark (1:54 or so) when she mentions that she made her client take a polygraph test and he passed it and then she laughed because she meant that that moment destroyed her faith in polygraphs. In other words, she did not believe that her client was telling the truth. This is very, very common. She wasn't laughing at the assumed victim in this case: the 12 year old girl.

She laughs slightly at 2:49 because she was absolutely right that she, as a defense attorney, had a right to see evidence from the bloodied underwear that had undergone a forensics investigation. It's a short laugh, the kind that people make when they know that what they are about to have to relate is so ridiculous, they cannot believe they even have to relate it. But alas, in the adversarial system of Justice, this kind of stuff happens.

The CRUX of the argument as to why her client got off is clearly about this piece of evidence and she explains it at the 3 minute mark, but here she is not laughing. In other words, she was doing EXACTLY what one would expect a good defense attorney to do.

She laughs again at 4:58 about the fact that because since the forensics lab fucked-up and got rid of the hole in the underwear that they cut out and analyzed, a guilty verdict would be a miscarriage of justice. And actually, it would have been.

So, Clinton laughs exactly 3 times on this recording of an interview where she is recounting some details from this case. Each laugh was less than 1/2 second in length. So, we are talking about 1.5 seconds out of 6 minutes.

I want to THANK you for providing me with the video, because it shows you to be just the stupid, moronic fuck I figured you were.

You have to go 35 years back in history to find a 6 minute audio of a recording of a woman talking "shop" with an interviewer and you think she is laughing at the victim of the rape? You are really that stupid? Or just a fucked-up partisan blowhard? I go with both possibilitiey.

Look, buddy, the adversarial system of Justice breeds exactly this type of lawyers, and it needs them.

Did this guy rape that poor little (then) 12 year old girl? I dunno. Probably, he did. But the prosecution fucked up more than once, quite obviously, and Clinton did her job. In other words, in your attempt to smear her, you just proved that she knows how to get the job done.

I bet you thought I would not listen to the recording. But I did, as I wrote, TWICE.

Thanks for your support of Hillary Clinton.


So, that point is now destroyed. She never ridiculed the victim, never laughed at the victim, and once a case is over, making an interview about the general details is absolutely allowed, because those are the same details that would be in the court records, anyway.

You also claim in your OP title that she lied, and yet, you have no evidence to prove it. You also claim that she destroyed the 12 year old girl, and yet, you have not evidence to prove that, also.


But it's ok, yer a Rightie and live in Unicornland, I expect no real level of excellence here from you. With Righties, I have learned to set the bar

very,








very









low.


I graciously accept your concession. Thanks for playing.


Derideo_Te Mertex LoneLaugher Luddly Neddite Grandma - here is some good entertainment for y'all!

 

[DarkFury]

Doesn't sound like Hillary to me??? I couldn't hear what was being said, the tape kept going in and out...but the words that were recognized...this woman speaking is a southerner....was Hillary born in the South?

Can you discern what is being asked and answered? I am on my Kindle and maybe my internet connection isn't good?

It was an interview WITH Hillary so yes it's Hillary.
And the "southern" accent? Just her again like the PHONY black accent she used while running.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I don't know what's sadder, Stats...that you never heard the tape recording in the first place...or that you need someone to link it for you now because you seem to be to lazy to do so yourself?


Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

Hmmmm, looks like you drew a blank, there...

Quite frankly, Stats...I'm not sure what's more embarrassing...you never hearing the recording in the first place...or you not having the ability to find it without a link now?

Just to get this cleared up: I am no one's secretary. If someone wants to make a point, then it is incumbent up that person to bring facts to the table. I don't excuse Rightie laziness.

 

[Oldstyle]

Doesn't sound like Hillary to me??? I couldn't hear what was being said, the tape kept going in and out...but the words that were recognized...this woman speaking is a southerner....was Hillary born in the South?

Can you discern what is being asked and answered? I am on my Kindle and maybe my internet connection isn't good?

Hillary spent a lot of time in Arkansas and she was obviously picking up the accent so they wouldn't think she was an "northerner". It's her all right. She's never denied that it was...

 

[Care4all]

I don't know what's sadder, Stats...that you never heard the tape recording in the first place...or that you need someone to link it for you now because you seem to be to lazy to do so yourself?


Well, then, point me to the recording.

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

Hmmmm, looks like you drew a blank, there...

Quite frankly, Stats...I'm not sure what's more embarrassing...you never hearing the recording in the first place...or you not having the ability to find it without a link now?

Was this brought up by the right wing media in 2008?

Why are you surprised we haven't heard it? Is it making the rounds in your right wing rags?

What did you hear on the tape that is damming? I couldn't make out a thing? Other than the woman on this tape is a southerner... in no way can I tell this is Hillary? At least not the Hillary's voice that is so distinctive that we have known since the 90s.????

Maybe we haven't heard this tape or anything about it because the whole Thu g is simply a LIE, being perpetrated by the right wing?

 

[Oldstyle]

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

Hmmmm, looks like you drew a blank, there...

Quite frankly, Stats...I'm not sure what's more embarrassing...you never hearing the recording in the first place...or you not having the ability to find it without a link now?

Just to get this cleared up: I am no one's secretary. If someone wants to make a point, then it is incumbent up that person to bring facts to the table. I don't excuse Rightie laziness.

LOL...you accuse others of "laziness" when you're the idiot that slept through press coverage of the tape when it came out and is now too inept to do a five second Google on it?

 

[Oldstyle]

Wow, you actually didn't hear it...did you? That begs the question, Stats...what news outlets do you frequent?

Ok, I will try once more.

If you will guide me to a link, I will listen.

I get a lot of news from the Interplanetary High Command. Where do you get yours? From Uranus?

Hmmmm, looks like you drew a blank, there...

Quite frankly, Stats...I'm not sure what's more embarrassing...you never hearing the recording in the first place...or you not having the ability to find it without a link now?

Was this brought up by the right wing media in 2008?

Why are you surprised we haven't heard it? Is it making the rounds in your right wing rags?

What did you hear on the tape that is damming? I couldn't make out a thing? Other than the woman on this tape is a southerner... in no way can I tell this is Hillary? At least not the Hillary's voice that is so distinctive that we have known since the 90s.????

Maybe we haven't heard this tape or anything about it because the whole Thu g is simply a LIE, being perpetrated by the right wing?

You're embarrassing yourself here, Care! The recording was part of an interview that Hillary Clinton gave to someone for a story. There is no question who's who on that tape.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

Check the video IN the OP.
It's there. AND you can track it back to Youtube.
OR....
The Audio...


She was in 1980 still quite PROUD of getting a child molester off.
She destroyed the 12 year old to boot.

So, I listened to it. TWICE.

Clinton laughs right before the 2 minute mark (1:54 or so) when she mentions that she made her client take a polygraph test and he passed it and then she laughed because she meant that that moment destroyed her faith in polygraphs. In other words, she did not believe that her client was telling the truth. This is very, very common. She wasn't laughing at the assumed victim in this case: the 12 year old girl.

She laughs slightly at 2:49 because she was absolutely right that she, as a defense attorney, had a right to see evidence from the bloodied underwear that had undergone a forensics investigation. It's a short laugh, the kind that people make when they know that what they are about to have to relate is so ridiculous, they cannot believe they even have to related it. But alas, in the adversarial system of Justice, this kind of stuff happens.

The CRUX of the argument as to why her client got off is clearly about this piece of evidence and she explains it at the 3 minute mark, but here she is not laughing. In other words, she was doing EXACTLY what one would expect a good defense attorney to do.

She laughs again at 4:58 about the fact that because the forensics lab fucked up and got rid of the hole in the underwear that they cut out and analyzed, a guilty verdict would be a miscarriage of justice. And actually, it would have been.

So, Clinton laughs exactly 3 times on this recording of an interview where she is recounting some details from this case.

I want to THANK you for providing me with the video, because it shows you to be just the stupid, moronic fuck I figured you were.

You have to go 35 years back in history to find a 6 minute audio of a recording of a woman talking "shop" with an interviewer and you think she is laughing at the victim of the rape? You are really that stupid? Or just a fucked-up partisan blowhard.

Look, buddy, the adversarial system of Justice breeds exactly this type of lawyers, and it needs them.

Did this guy rape that poor little (then) 12 year old girl. I dunno. Probably, he did. But the prosecution fucked up more than once, quite obviously, and Clinton did her job. In other words, in your attempt to smear her, you just proved that she knows how to get the job done.

I bet you thought I would not listen to the recording. But I did, as I wrote, TWICE.

Thanks for your support of Hillary Clinton.


So, that point is now destroyed. She never ridiculed the victim, and once a case is over, making an interview about the general details is absolutely allowed, because those are the same details that would be in the court records, anyway.

You also claim in your OP title that she lied, and yet, you have no evidence to prove it. You also claim that she destroyed the 12 year old girl, and yet, you have not evidence to prove that, also.


But it's ok, yer a Rightie and live in Unicornland, I expect no real level of excellence here from you. With Righties, I have learned to set the bar

very,








very









low.


I graciously accept your concession. Thanks for playing.


Derideo_Te Mertex LoneLaugher Luddly Neddite Grandma - here is some good entertainment for y'all!

So were you born a urine sniffing shit stripe or did you have to take classes?

You can write anything you want. I completely destroyed your entire argument across the entire line, with exactly the audio that YOU provided proves the point.

This is what happens when fools like you let your emotions get away with you instead of sticking to the facts. There is not one thing that Hillary said in that audio that is wrong or inappropriate. She talked "shop" with an interviewer as any attorney would, she stuck to the facts of the case and proved that her tenacity got the job done. Had the prosecution actually done it's job, then I bet that her client would have lost. But she knew how to fight for her client, completely within the constraints of the law. That's what great lawyers do.

Must really suck to be you. You confirm my belief that most Conservatives really are lacking in the brains department.

Better luck next time.

 

[Oldstyle]

And just for the record? Hillary Clinton was in violation of attorney-client privilege when she told that reporter that her client had passed the polygraph and that result forever changed her opinion of the validity of that test.

 

[Rocko]

They have to follow rules and offer the best defense possible. Ridiculing the victim behind closed doors is not part of that. Hillary made snide comments and indicated that she thought the whole thing was humorous.

Proof of this? Evidence? Video? Audio? Testimony?

Have you really not heard the recording, Stats?

I agree totally that lawyers do have to offer the best defense possible but when you find it "amusing" that you got a rapist off with time served...two months...and joke about it to someone else...that makes you a scumbag in my eyes.

Well, then, point me to the recording.

Check the video IN the OP.
It's there. AND you can track it back to Youtube.
OR....
The Audio...


She was in 1980 still quite PROUD of getting a child molester off.
She destroyed the 12 year old to boot.

So, I listened to it. TWICE.

Clinton laughs right before the 2 minute mark (1:54 or so) when she mentions that she made her client take a polygraph test and he passed it and then she laughed because she meant that that moment destroyed her faith in polygraphs. In other words, she did not believe that her client was telling the truth. This is very, very common. She wasn't laughing at the assumed victim in this case: the 12 year old girl.

She laughs slightly at 2:49 because she was absolutely right that she, as a defense attorney, had a right to see evidence from the bloodied underwear that had undergone a forensics investigation. It's a short laugh, the kind that people make when they know that what they are about to have to relate is so ridiculous, they cannot believe they even have to related it. But alas, in the adversarial system of Justice, this kind of stuff happens.

The CRUX of the argument as to why her client got off is clearly about this piece of evidence and she explains it at the 3 minute mark, but here she is not laughing. In other words, she was doing EXACTLY what one would expect a good defense attorney to do.

She laughs again at 4:58 about the fact that because since the forensics lab fucked-up and got rid of the hole in the underwear that they cut out and analyzed, a guilty verdict would be a miscarriage of justice. And actually, it would have been.

So, Clinton laughs exactly 3 times on this recording of an interview where she is recounting some details from this case. Each laugh was less than 1/2 second in length. So, we are talking about 1.5 seconds out of 6 minutes.

I want to THANK you for providing me with the video, because it shows you to be just the stupid, moronic fuck I figured you were.

You have to go 35 years back in history to find a 6 minute audio of a recording of a woman talking "shop" with an interviewer and you think she is laughing at the victim of the rape? You are really that stupid? Or just a fucked-up partisan blowhard? I go with both possibilitiey.

Look, buddy, the adversarial system of Justice breeds exactly this type of lawyers, and it needs them.

Did this guy rape that poor little (then) 12 year old girl? I dunno. Probably, he did. But the prosecution fucked up more than once, quite obviously, and Clinton did her job. In other words, in your attempt to smear her, you just proved that she knows how to get the job done.

I bet you thought I would not listen to the recording. But I did, as I wrote, TWICE.

Thanks for your support of Hillary Clinton.


So, that point is now destroyed. She never ridiculed the victim, never laughed at the victim, and once a case is over, making an interview about the general details is absolutely allowed, because those are the same details that would be in the court records, anyway.

You also claim in your OP title that she lied, and yet, you have no evidence to prove it. You also claim that she destroyed the 12 year old girl, and yet, you have not evidence to prove that, also.


But it's ok, yer a Rightie and live in Unicornland, I expect no real level of excellence here from you. With Righties, I have learned to set the bar

very,








very









low.


I graciously accept your concession. Thanks for playing.


Derideo_Te Mertex LoneLaugher Luddly Neddite Grandma - here is some good entertainment for y'all!

Calling your lolberal dork friends for backup huh. You're a bitch!