Shooting in LA

[LeftofLeft]

thoughts & prayers.

That's your input, troll?

nothing about the OP?

if it's good enough answer for the CONgress (R)s, then it's good enough for me.

Indeed, this stuff is a daily occurrence in places run by people like you. No biggie.

As if the Republicans play no part in these places.

At this point in time, a Republican in Los Angeles might as well be a Unicorn.

 

[themirrorthief]

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

The AR-15 inspired him to shoot people, merely by being in his home.

Right, irrational gun haters?

I was for the war before I was against the war...liberal logic

 

[xband]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

All I have is one pump action 12 gauge shotgun loaded 00 buckshot for home protection. Biden said everyone should have that and if not, the government will buy you one for free.

 

[HVilleSCGuy]

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

The AR-15 inspired him to shoot people, merely by being in his home.

Right, irrational gun haters?

Wierd. I own 3 and have never had the urge to randomly shoot people. I must be doing this wrong.

 

[JGalt]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

Something spontaneously set him off. If the shooting was pre-meditated, he would have used the AR instead of a pistol.

 

[Auld Phart]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

Something spontaneously set him off. If the shooting was pre-meditated, he would have used the AR instead of a pistol.

Maybe

 

[PatriotJohn888]

Biden's America sure isn't what we were promised.

 

[xband]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

Something spontaneously set him off. If the shooting was pre-meditated, he would have used the AR instead of a pistol.

Maybe

No reason to have an AR-15 that a gunsmith can easily turn into a M-16.

 

[JGalt]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

Something spontaneously set him off. If the shooting was pre-meditated, he would have used the AR instead of a pistol.

Maybe

I retract that. He committed three separate shooting in three different areas, within 25 minutes...

2 killed in downtown Los Angeles shooting spree; suspect dies in OC standoff on 91 Freeway

 

[frigidweirdo]

thoughts & prayers.

That's your input, troll?

nothing about the OP?

if it's good enough answer for the CONgress (R)s, then it's good enough for me.

Indeed, this stuff is a daily occurrence in places run by people like you. No biggie.

As if the Republicans play no part in these places.

At this point in time, a Republican in Los Angeles might as well be a Unicorn.

But they still impact LA. National elections impact LA. National things are seen my many in LA.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

Because... you might want to sit for this... it was literally the topic of the article. It was literally the headline.

 

[Auld Phart]

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

Because... you might want to sit for this... it was literally the topic of the article. It was literally the headline.

it was literally the topic of the article. It was literally the headline.

And the question is "Why?"


Why was the rifle even mentioned in the article.

It wasn't used in the rampage, it wasn't even there.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

Well, they're reporting what the police told them. Why would the police say that?

Wonder if he also owned a legally purchased hair dryer and waffle iron ?

 

[JGalt]

 

[Concerned American]

thoughts & prayers.

That's your input, troll?

nothing about the OP?

if it's good enough answer for the CONgress (R)s, then it's good enough for me.

Indeed, this stuff is a daily occurrence in places run by people like you. No biggie.

As if the Republicans play no part in these places.

In the democrat bastion of Los Angeles--not hardly moron.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why was the rifle even mentioned in the article.

Because it is literally the point of the article. They wrote an article to report the information that he had an arsenal of weapons at home. Says so right in the headline.

 

[frigidweirdo]

thoughts & prayers.

That's your input, troll?

nothing about the OP?

if it's good enough answer for the CONgress (R)s, then it's good enough for me.

Indeed, this stuff is a daily occurrence in places run by people like you. No biggie.

As if the Republicans play no part in these places.

In the democrat bastion of Los Angeles--not hardly moron.

Ah, insults. Bye, forever

 

[Concerned American]

Gunman in deadly L.A. shooting rampage had an arsenal of weapons at home, sources say (yahoo.com)

If he used a handgun, why did they mention in the first paragraph he owned a legally purchased AR-15?

A gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Los Angeles on Tuesday — killing two people and wounding two others — had an arsenal of weapons at his home and possessed a legally purchased AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, law enforcement sources told The Times as more details about the incident emerged."

The AR-15 had nothing to do with his rampage.

Well, they're reporting what the police told them. Why would the police say that?

Wonder if he also owned a legally purchased hair dryer and waffle iron ?

From a video I saw on here the other day--maybe he should have a legally purchased frying pan, CLANG, LOL.

 

[LeftofLeft]

thoughts & prayers.

That's your input, troll?

nothing about the OP?

if it's good enough answer for the CONgress (R)s, then it's good enough for me.

Indeed, this stuff is a daily occurrence in places run by people like you. No biggie.

As if the Republicans play no part in these places.

At this point in time, a Republican in Los Angeles might as well be a Unicorn.

But they still impact LA. National elections impact LA. National things are seen my many in LA.

How did Republicans impact LA? LA should be a utopia being run by Democrats. National things are seen everywhere just as rain is wet.

 

[Concerned American]

thoughts & prayers.

That's your input, troll?

nothing about the OP?

if it's good enough answer for the CONgress (R)s, then it's good enough for me.

Indeed, this stuff is a daily occurrence in places run by people like you. No biggie.

As if the Republicans play no part in these places.

In the democrat bastion of Los Angeles--not hardly moron.

Ah, insults. Bye, forever

Thank you, thank you very much. Elvis has left the building.