Shootings of Asian-Americans in Atlanta

161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

It was reported that he believed they were causing him to sin.


Sexual addiction is a problem that causes problems in people's lives. That he referred to it as "sin" is just his background influencing his terminology.

It is telling that this happened the day after he got kicked out of his home.

The sex was just as sinful last week, when he had a place to sleep. But he went on his rampage THIS week. When his life blew up.

That's some bullshit, it is just a weak ass cop out for this coward. Give us another coward who loved having sex with women that went out and killed women because he loved having sex.


How is it a cop out? I want him dead within the year. Discussing his motives is not saying that they are good reasons.


Are you pretending to be retarded again, or is this the real you? SOmetimes I can't tell.
No you don't . No one here believes that for a minute.


He committed mass murder. Of course I want him dead. I think we should generally use the death penalty for most murders if they can be proven without a shadow of a doubt.

I have been consistent on this point for many years.
Sure....;) ;)


Plenty of people on this site, who have been here as long or longer than I, that would be happy to call me out on it, if I was lying.


Default with me, is that murderers should be put to death, if their guilt is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.


Barring mitigating circumstances,

We have murdered tens of thousands with our bombs. People every bit as innocent as those killed here.
 
You said black folks commit the most crime.

FBI — Table 43
Of course they do. Black thugs commit the majority the majority of violent crimes especially. We're talking about 4% of the population and 50% of murders.

Shit head do you know how to read? This white thug just murdered 8 folks, but that is alright to you racist ass clowns as long as it wasn't someone black or hispanic.
Murders of 8 people is a daily event in Chicago alone. We don't need to get into St Louis, Baltimore and the hundreds of other shitholes where blacks murder on a daily basis.
All at once by the same person?
 



Raise fucked up kids for the last 2 or 3 generations, what do you expect?

You tell us.

You can expect to see more of this shit. People are being deliberately conditioned and trained by our society and media to be dysfunctional and fucking miserable as a result.
Some of them are going to lose their shit and start fucking shit up.






(Did you really need someone to explain this to you? Are you that simple?)
 
Biden is flying the flag at half mast to honor the eight victims. That's fine, but there are almost that many black on black murders every day in this country and not one peep.
 
Owning a gun sure as hell didn't cause him to go on a killing spree.
True. He didn't own a gun and then when he decided he went out and bought one and started murdering.

I knew a psychiatrist in Cincinnati who did that back when Ohio laws allowed you to walk into a store and carry the gun out the same day. He bought a gun, shot his wife to death, and they only put him away for three years. A lot of people were pretty indignant, including me ------- she was popular and well-liked. (Him, not so much!)


Yeah...when you plan on murdering someone that 3 day waiting period really makes you stop.........

What a dumb idea............mass public shooters, on average, plan their shootings 6 months to two years in advance......so getting the gun isn't going to be stopped by waiting periods or gun rationing...
 
Georgia officer condemned for saying Atlanta shooter was 'having a bad day'

Capt Jay Baker also reportedly posted images on Facebook of T-shirts with racist slogan on China and coronavirus

Georgia officer condemned for saying Atlanta shooter was 'having a bad day'

If true I don't see how he keeps his job. He could no longer be a valid trusted witness against a single Asian and a lawyer will likely use it to defend any minority.
 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.

 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.


Of course it applies. The laws of Moses predicted the coming of Jesus and Jesus was there to fulfill those words.

Prostitution was a stoning offense under the old law but what did Jesus say?
 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.


Of course it applies. The laws of Moses predicted the coming of Jesus and Jesus was there to fulfill those words.

Prostitution was a stoning offense under the old law but what did Jesus say?


Did he abolish that law? No, he said those without sin cast the first stone....
 
Sex workers should carry firearms.
After an appropriate training course and licensing, naturally.


No reason for a license. Get as much training as you can afford in time and money...no mandate.
I have seen too many idiots with guns.


And yet with 600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people able to carry guns in public for self defense........accidental gun deaths have been going down, not up......and before the democrats decided to destroy the police, violent crime was going down, not up....
I have no problem with people carrying guns. I carry mine, of course I am trained, qualified and licensed. I am just not in favor of every idiot in America carrying one with no training, no knowledge of applicable law, and no certification. If your were ever on a unregulated shooting range, you wouldn't either. I've seen military people that didn't need to be carrying one for their own good and the good of everybody in the chow hall or near the sand barrel.


I agree....but......any licensing, will become a ban by other means.....the requirements will become impossible to meet for anyone who isn't rich or well connected...this is how they do it in Britain for the few hunting shotguns they allow people to own....as well as on the continent...

Sorry.....not supporting a restriction on a Right like that...
Got no problem with "right to keep and bear arms" and not debating what a "well regulated militia" is, but gun nuts do not believe in any intelligent regulation at all and that is wrong, makes no sense, gives responsible gun owners a bad name and does away with "well regulated" in any way shape form or fashion. Yesterday some sex addict shot up 3 different whorehouses in Georgia. Today some depressed nut ball from Texas brought all his guns to Washington and got arrested outside what he thought was the home of the Vice President. His mother said he had been depress and phoned to say he was in Washington and going to solve his problems. Would proper licensing solve all that? No. It might help the idiot factor though, having to at least sit a professionally instructed class, take tests of safety and operation before a certified instructor. I say, in your home for personal defense keep anything you want. I do and always have, but some people are a danger to themselves and everybody around them, and should not have them on the street. Everybody free to carry anything they want, just about anywhere they want is in no way well regulated, and your position is poor people may not be able to pay for training and getting a license doesn't make sense. These weapons today are not flint locks or even 6 shooter and this ain't the old west. Wait til you see the hill billy militia guys swaggering around on a range (if you can call it that) with mac 10s dangling with full clips until they line up and start shooting at sticks of dynamite on a berm 40 feet away and walking around drinking beer between rounds. People like them, with no respect for their fire power or safety and you who will indulge any carry anytime by anyone as some sacred right make us all look bad.


600 million guns in private hands......over 19.4 million people legally carry guns in public...

One guy broke the law.....all the laws regarding guns, and murdered people......

Meanwhile, the other 600 million guns were not used to murder anyone, and the 19.4 million people who carry their guns legally did not murder anyone.


You have no rational argument for what you want......we have a history of governments using massive regulations to prevent people who have the legal Right to own and carry guns from being able to own and carry guns...

You are wrong......that is just a fact.

And before the democrats decided to make war on our police.....27 years of more people owning and carrying guns and what was the impact on those things you fear?

49% reduction in gun murder.

75% reduction in gun crime.

72% reduction in violent crime in general.

You have no rational argument for the policies that we know will result in the government barring people from owning and carrying guns.

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

New Concealed Carry Report For 2020: 19.48 Million Permit Holders, 820,000 More Than Last Year despite many states shutting down issuing permits because of the Coronavirus - Crime Prevention Research Center


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.


From the CDC.....

Accidental Gun deaths...

1999.....824
2000.....776
2001.....802
2002.....762
2003.....730
2004.....649
2005.....789
2006.....642
2007.....613
2008.....592
2009.....554
2010.....606
2011.....591
2012.....548
2013.....505
2014.....461
2015.....489
2016.....495
2017.....486
2018.....458
2019.....486
I am just not as paranoid as you over the 2nd amendment. The key statement was in your first line "people legally carry guns in public...". We just disagree about what should be considered legal and whether there should be any regulations regarding weapons at all. Your number 19.4 legally carrying in public sounds dubius and I could not locate a sources for it. Equilly or more dubius is the Washington Post number, I saw of 3 million. I suspect the number is in between those two. Here is an interesting number for you. In the year 1800 there were 5,308,483 counted in the census of the United State. Here is a fact to go along with it. As numbers climbed to the 330,000,000 plus of today it has become necessary for the common good to increase regulation in just about everything to avoid chaos and create a society that works for the whole population. In my opinion, rolling gun regulation back to 1790 standards is ludicrous, beyond rational thought.
If looking for how many weapons injuries, it seems everybody is more interested in weapons deaths annually. Available numbers are large, unless compared to the number legally carrying. I am confident the number of accidental shootings, including accidental deaths could be reduced with proper training. Unlike you, I feel it is worth the inconvenience to reduce weapons accidents, and training would (not might) reduce that number.
For all your, numbers, bits of info you try to string together to support your cause, I suspect you went to the trouble of getting your own carry permit and are (like myself) a licensed carry permit holder. It is not the people like you and I that concern me. We are unlikely to be involve in an accidental or illegal shooting situation, as all the permit holders, I know are very serious people, as opposed to the people I have personally witnessed. As someone trained not only on weapons, but in the field of safety itself, you will never be able to convince me, proper training does not make any complex operation safer for all concerned, and therefore unnecessary and certainly not regarding weapons. Trying to wrap the flag around your concept only works on the simple minded.

There are already regulations on gun ownership and it isn't doing any good. Putting more regulations on gun ownership doesn't seem like the answer.
The answer is to get the criminals off the street and use the death penalty more. Defunding the police forces certainly isn't a solution. That's just plain moronic.
I only spoke in favor of carry permits, issued by states after training, certification and background check as a safety issue, as safety is often enhanced by training. I have mine and have had for years. Nobody spoke about de-funding cop. Certainly not in my town.
 
The guy who did this was obviously mentally ill, and because solely of his skin color he was a white supremacist. Yeah getting tired of this shit.

What folks are getting tired of is because he is white "oh he is mentally ill", but had he been black that is just what we do.


No....the majority of black shooters in this country are members of criminal gangs...shooting each other over drug turf, girlfriends, and social media insults......

The white guys who commit mass public shootings actually are typically mentally ill...

That is the truth, fucking deal with it.

No that is some bullshit that you are hoping folks will believe.


Nope....that is the fact, you dumb ass.....from actual FBI data.....

Post that data shit for brains.


Blacks killing other blacks...

 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.


Of course it applies. The laws of Moses predicted the coming of Jesus and Jesus was there to fulfill those words.

Prostitution was a stoning offense under the old law but what did Jesus say?


Did he abolish that law? No, he said those without sin cast the first stone....

Right, which was counter to the law.
 
Sex workers should carry firearms.
After an appropriate training course and licensing, naturally.


No reason for a license. Get as much training as you can afford in time and money...no mandate.
I have seen too many idiots with guns.


And yet with 600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people able to carry guns in public for self defense........accidental gun deaths have been going down, not up......and before the democrats decided to destroy the police, violent crime was going down, not up....
I have no problem with people carrying guns. I carry mine, of course I am trained, qualified and licensed. I am just not in favor of every idiot in America carrying one with no training, no knowledge of applicable law, and no certification. If your were ever on a unregulated shooting range, you wouldn't either. I've seen military people that didn't need to be carrying one for their own good and the good of everybody in the chow hall or near the sand barrel.


I agree....but......any licensing, will become a ban by other means.....the requirements will become impossible to meet for anyone who isn't rich or well connected...this is how they do it in Britain for the few hunting shotguns they allow people to own....as well as on the continent...

Sorry.....not supporting a restriction on a Right like that...
Got no problem with "right to keep and bear arms" and not debating what a "well regulated militia" is, but gun nuts do not believe in any intelligent regulation at all and that is wrong, makes no sense, gives responsible gun owners a bad name and does away with "well regulated" in any way shape form or fashion. Yesterday some sex addict shot up 3 different whorehouses in Georgia. Today some depressed nut ball from Texas brought all his guns to Washington and got arrested outside what he thought was the home of the Vice President. His mother said he had been depress and phoned to say he was in Washington and going to solve his problems. Would proper licensing solve all that? No. It might help the idiot factor though, having to at least sit a professionally instructed class, take tests of safety and operation before a certified instructor. I say, in your home for personal defense keep anything you want. I do and always have, but some people are a danger to themselves and everybody around them, and should not have them on the street. Everybody free to carry anything they want, just about anywhere they want is in no way well regulated, and your position is poor people may not be able to pay for training and getting a license doesn't make sense. These weapons today are not flint locks or even 6 shooter and this ain't the old west. Wait til you see the hill billy militia guys swaggering around on a range (if you can call it that) with mac 10s dangling with full clips until they line up and start shooting at sticks of dynamite on a berm 40 feet away and walking around drinking beer between rounds. People like them, with no respect for their fire power or safety and you who will indulge any carry anytime by anyone as some sacred right make us all look bad.


600 million guns in private hands......over 19.4 million people legally carry guns in public...

One guy broke the law.....all the laws regarding guns, and murdered people......

Meanwhile, the other 600 million guns were not used to murder anyone, and the 19.4 million people who carry their guns legally did not murder anyone.


You have no rational argument for what you want......we have a history of governments using massive regulations to prevent people who have the legal Right to own and carry guns from being able to own and carry guns...

You are wrong......that is just a fact.

And before the democrats decided to make war on our police.....27 years of more people owning and carrying guns and what was the impact on those things you fear?

49% reduction in gun murder.

75% reduction in gun crime.

72% reduction in violent crime in general.

You have no rational argument for the policies that we know will result in the government barring people from owning and carrying guns.

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

New Concealed Carry Report For 2020: 19.48 Million Permit Holders, 820,000 More Than Last Year despite many states shutting down issuing permits because of the Coronavirus - Crime Prevention Research Center


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.


From the CDC.....

Accidental Gun deaths...

1999.....824
2000.....776
2001.....802
2002.....762
2003.....730
2004.....649
2005.....789
2006.....642
2007.....613
2008.....592
2009.....554
2010.....606
2011.....591
2012.....548
2013.....505
2014.....461
2015.....489
2016.....495
2017.....486
2018.....458
2019.....486
I am just not as paranoid as you over the 2nd amendment. The key statement was in your first line "people legally carry guns in public...". We just disagree about what should be considered legal and whether there should be any regulations regarding weapons at all. Your number 19.4 legally carrying in public sounds dubius and I could not locate a sources for it. Equilly or more dubius is the Washington Post number, I saw of 3 million. I suspect the number is in between those two. Here is an interesting number for you. In the year 1800 there were 5,308,483 counted in the census of the United State. Here is a fact to go along with it. As numbers climbed to the 330,000,000 plus of today it has become necessary for the common good to increase regulation in just about everything to avoid chaos and create a society that works for the whole population. In my opinion, rolling gun regulation back to 1790 standards is ludicrous, beyond rational thought.
If looking for how many weapons injuries, it seems everybody is more interested in weapons deaths annually. Available numbers are large, unless compared to the number legally carrying. I am confident the number of accidental shootings, including accidental deaths could be reduced with proper training. Unlike you, I feel it is worth the inconvenience to reduce weapons accidents, and training would (not might) reduce that number.
For all your, numbers, bits of info you try to string together to support your cause, I suspect you went to the trouble of getting your own carry permit and are (like myself) a licensed carry permit holder. It is not the people like you and I that concern me. We are unlikely to be involve in an accidental or illegal shooting situation, as all the permit holders, I know are very serious people, as opposed to the people I have personally witnessed. As someone trained not only on weapons, but in the field of safety itself, you will never be able to convince me, proper training does not make any complex operation safer for all concerned, and therefore unnecessary and certainly not regarding weapons. Trying to wrap the flag around your concept only works on the simple minded.

There are already regulations on gun ownership and it isn't doing any good. Putting more regulations on gun ownership doesn't seem like the answer.
The answer is to get the criminals off the street and use the death penalty more. Defunding the police forces certainly isn't a solution. That's just plain moronic.
I only spoke in favor of carry permits, issued by states after training, certification and background check as a safety issue, as safety is often enhanced by training. I have mine and have had for years. Nobody spoke about de-funding cop. Certainly not in my town.


There should be no carry permits......as we have seen in democrat party controlled states and cities, they refuse to give permits to people simply because they have the power to refuse......
 
Owning a gun sure as hell didn't cause him to go on a killing spree.
True. He didn't own a gun and then when he decided he went out and bought one and started murdering.

I knew a psychiatrist in Cincinnati who did that back when Ohio laws allowed you to walk into a store and carry the gun out the same day. He bought a gun, shot his wife to death, and they only put him away for three years. A lot of people were pretty indignant, including me ------- she was popular and well-liked. (Him, not so much!)


Yeah...when you plan on murdering someone that 3 day waiting period really makes you stop.........

What a dumb idea............mass public shooters, on average, plan their shootings 6 months to two years in advance......so getting the gun isn't going to be stopped by waiting periods or gun rationing...

That's right and if he couldn't buy one, he'd steal it, like the Sandyhook shooter did.
 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.


Of course it applies. The laws of Moses predicted the coming of Jesus and Jesus was there to fulfill those words.

Prostitution was a stoning offense under the old law but what did Jesus say?


Did he abolish that law? No, he said those without sin cast the first stone....

Right, which was counter to the law.


Did he abolish the law?
 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.


Of course it applies. The laws of Moses predicted the coming of Jesus and Jesus was there to fulfill those words.

Prostitution was a stoning offense under the old law but what did Jesus say?


Did he abolish that law? No, he said those without sin cast the first stone....

Right, which was counter to the law.


Did he abolish the law?

Yes, his words abolished the law. Was she stoned?

Did he bring the legislature together to hold a vote to overturn the laws? No.

Was she stoned as the law commanded?
 
Owning a gun sure as hell didn't cause him to go on a killing spree.
True. He didn't own a gun and then when he decided he went out and bought one and started murdering.

I knew a psychiatrist in Cincinnati who did that back when Ohio laws allowed you to walk into a store and carry the gun out the same day. He bought a gun, shot his wife to death, and they only put him away for three years. A lot of people were pretty indignant, including me ------- she was popular and well-liked. (Him, not so much!)


Yeah...when you plan on murdering someone that 3 day waiting period really makes you stop.........

What a dumb idea............mass public shooters, on average, plan their shootings 6 months to two years in advance......so getting the gun isn't going to be stopped by waiting periods or gun rationing...

That's right and if he couldn't buy one, he'd steal it, like the Sandyhook shooter did.


The anti-gun extremists always lie and say they will allow us to keep pump action shotguns and deer hunting rifles..........after they take the rest....

This is a lie...

Polytechnic shooting in Russia, 5 shot, pump action shotgun....20 killed, 70 wounded....


they will take all the guns if given the power..
 
Sex workers should carry firearms.
After an appropriate training course and licensing, naturally.


No reason for a license. Get as much training as you can afford in time and money...no mandate.
I have seen too many idiots with guns.


And yet with 600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people able to carry guns in public for self defense........accidental gun deaths have been going down, not up......and before the democrats decided to destroy the police, violent crime was going down, not up....
I have no problem with people carrying guns. I carry mine, of course I am trained, qualified and licensed. I am just not in favor of every idiot in America carrying one with no training, no knowledge of applicable law, and no certification. If your were ever on a unregulated shooting range, you wouldn't either. I've seen military people that didn't need to be carrying one for their own good and the good of everybody in the chow hall or near the sand barrel.


I agree....but......any licensing, will become a ban by other means.....the requirements will become impossible to meet for anyone who isn't rich or well connected...this is how they do it in Britain for the few hunting shotguns they allow people to own....as well as on the continent...

Sorry.....not supporting a restriction on a Right like that...
Got no problem with "right to keep and bear arms" and not debating what a "well regulated militia" is, but gun nuts do not believe in any intelligent regulation at all and that is wrong, makes no sense, gives responsible gun owners a bad name and does away with "well regulated" in any way shape form or fashion. Yesterday some sex addict shot up 3 different whorehouses in Georgia. Today some depressed nut ball from Texas brought all his guns to Washington and got arrested outside what he thought was the home of the Vice President. His mother said he had been depress and phoned to say he was in Washington and going to solve his problems. Would proper licensing solve all that? No. It might help the idiot factor though, having to at least sit a professionally instructed class, take tests of safety and operation before a certified instructor. I say, in your home for personal defense keep anything you want. I do and always have, but some people are a danger to themselves and everybody around them, and should not have them on the street. Everybody free to carry anything they want, just about anywhere they want is in no way well regulated, and your position is poor people may not be able to pay for training and getting a license doesn't make sense. These weapons today are not flint locks or even 6 shooter and this ain't the old west. Wait til you see the hill billy militia guys swaggering around on a range (if you can call it that) with mac 10s dangling with full clips until they line up and start shooting at sticks of dynamite on a berm 40 feet away and walking around drinking beer between rounds. People like them, with no respect for their fire power or safety and you who will indulge any carry anytime by anyone as some sacred right make us all look bad.


600 million guns in private hands......over 19.4 million people legally carry guns in public...

One guy broke the law.....all the laws regarding guns, and murdered people......

Meanwhile, the other 600 million guns were not used to murder anyone, and the 19.4 million people who carry their guns legally did not murder anyone.


You have no rational argument for what you want......we have a history of governments using massive regulations to prevent people who have the legal Right to own and carry guns from being able to own and carry guns...

You are wrong......that is just a fact.

And before the democrats decided to make war on our police.....27 years of more people owning and carrying guns and what was the impact on those things you fear?

49% reduction in gun murder.

75% reduction in gun crime.

72% reduction in violent crime in general.

You have no rational argument for the policies that we know will result in the government barring people from owning and carrying guns.

Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

New Concealed Carry Report For 2020: 19.48 Million Permit Holders, 820,000 More Than Last Year despite many states shutting down issuing permits because of the Coronavirus - Crime Prevention Research Center


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.


From the CDC.....

Accidental Gun deaths...

1999.....824
2000.....776
2001.....802
2002.....762
2003.....730
2004.....649
2005.....789
2006.....642
2007.....613
2008.....592
2009.....554
2010.....606
2011.....591
2012.....548
2013.....505
2014.....461
2015.....489
2016.....495
2017.....486
2018.....458
2019.....486
I am just not as paranoid as you over the 2nd amendment. The key statement was in your first line "people legally carry guns in public...". We just disagree about what should be considered legal and whether there should be any regulations regarding weapons at all. Your number 19.4 legally carrying in public sounds dubius and I could not locate a sources for it. Equilly or more dubius is the Washington Post number, I saw of 3 million. I suspect the number is in between those two. Here is an interesting number for you. In the year 1800 there were 5,308,483 counted in the census of the United State. Here is a fact to go along with it. As numbers climbed to the 330,000,000 plus of today it has become necessary for the common good to increase regulation in just about everything to avoid chaos and create a society that works for the whole population. In my opinion, rolling gun regulation back to 1790 standards is ludicrous, beyond rational thought.
If looking for how many weapons injuries, it seems everybody is more interested in weapons deaths annually. Available numbers are large, unless compared to the number legally carrying. I am confident the number of accidental shootings, including accidental deaths could be reduced with proper training. Unlike you, I feel it is worth the inconvenience to reduce weapons accidents, and training would (not might) reduce that number.
For all your, numbers, bits of info you try to string together to support your cause, I suspect you went to the trouble of getting your own carry permit and are (like myself) a licensed carry permit holder. It is not the people like you and I that concern me. We are unlikely to be involve in an accidental or illegal shooting situation, as all the permit holders, I know are very serious people, as opposed to the people I have personally witnessed. As someone trained not only on weapons, but in the field of safety itself, you will never be able to convince me, proper training does not make any complex operation safer for all concerned, and therefore unnecessary and certainly not regarding weapons. Trying to wrap the flag around your concept only works on the simple minded.

There are already regulations on gun ownership and it isn't doing any good. Putting more regulations on gun ownership doesn't seem like the answer.
The answer is to get the criminals off the street and use the death penalty more. Defunding the police forces certainly isn't a solution. That's just plain moronic.
I only spoke in favor of carry permits, issued by states after training, certification and background check as a safety issue, as safety is often enhanced by training. I have mine and have had for years. Nobody spoke about de-funding cop. Certainly not in my town.

Im all for training, as long as it's free. I'm opposed to permits.
 
161828912_471831960838802_1069463962306031342_n.jpg


A white male?

Shooting spree?!

You don't say.

RIP to the victims but let's be clear. The Asian community banded together and protested nationally so Chinese American NYPD officer Peter Liang would not get jail time for shooting an unarmed black man (Akai Gurley) in a project stairwell in 2016 and he didn't serve any jail time for the murder.

stairwell_shooting_protest-jpeg-03f64_4aba8e5a8b173080b81e87e824003bcb.jpg


liang-page-1.jpg


2TNUIZWRNJHG3OEAASGWGAD3AY.jpg


They felt that because white officers don't serve jail time for shooting unarmed black people neither should Peter.

These are same people on Reddit during the George Floyd protests bragging about being "Rooftop Koreans" with White supremacists.

7ad.jpg



Now in the wake of this Asians are all over insta talking about the black and Asian coming together.

161706975_471831970838801_1086315916216177185_n.jpg

This idea that we're suppose to just jump up and get in formation because they've now finally come to a place of understanding is backwards thinking. This really just shows how weak and docile people think we as black people are. Shit on us for many years and then turn around asking for friendship after all the shit.

Trust me they will ignore this white shooting and show some mentally ill black homeless teen knocking over an old Asian man's grocery bag and shout hate crime!

I remember that Korean male who shot up Virginia Tech college campus in 2007. The Asian community did a press conference apologizing on the shooter's behalf. They were apologizing to white people since the victims were overwhelmingly white.

Do you see white people doing press conferences apologizing for random white men shooting up people?

Happen. Not. Gonna

Would those Asian folks have apologized if the shooter shot up Black people ?

Happen. Not. Gonna.

Look at him (Robert Long - 21)

EwqDVB4VEAM4Jmh


He looks like his entire ancestral line is inbred to the max.

Irony is he was driving a Hyundai while committing a hate crime against Asian people?

White dudes truly are and always have been the top terrorists, public enemy # fucking 1, of this country and the fact that it has been pussyfooted around for all these decades is the reason that their foolery continues to fester.

Bu Bu Bu, But, The Blacks

Last time I checked, Black people didn’t give a enough of a shit to randomly shoot Asians

Let's see the likes of Rocko Foreigner Looking In. Quasar44 Deplorable Yankee spin this

Because, welp, bitches, while you were busy scapegoating the black community for the uptick in anti-Asian incidents, your own people came through to prove your lying, bigoted asses wrong. And whitey provided plenty of ugly receipts in the form of spent bullets, and several dead bodies of Asian people.

The shooter's father was a youth pastor and Robert was known to be religious. Perhaps he was getting even for Trump's "China virus".

...


HOw does being religious support your conclusion of "trump's china virus"?


Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry.

A start of the "Civil War"?

Trump Pastor Urges Christians To Prepare For Civil War...Again


Against oriental massage girls?

Got it. It is just anti-Christian bigotry from you.
"Oriental"? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:


I'm not sure from the article exactly which Asian country they victims are from. So, "oriental" is fitting.


You inability to defend your anti-CHristian bigotry is noted.

"Oriental" does not describe people.


Sure it does, as much as Asian does.

You are being a snowflake.

It doesn't. I had this pointed out to me once and simply accepted it. I didn't try and continue to use the wrong word.

Oriental describes a rug.


So you want to ignore the fact that you assumed his being Christian was a supporting factor for this being a wace related shooting, thus revealing you to be an anti-Christian bigot,

to instead focus on semantics.


Denied.


What made you hate Christians?

I did no such thing but this seems to be your thing.


You cited that his father was a pastor and speculated in the next sentence that perhaps this was thus connectected to "Trumps China virsus" as though his father being Christian was evidence of wacism.


That was you exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry.

I posted a link noting who he was. As it turns out it would seem his beliefs did cause him to do what he did.


You posted a link noting who he was, suggested that it was his beliefs that led him to be wacist and thus kill people.


That was anti-Christian bigotry on you.


His motive was sex addiction. Your argument linking Christianity and Wacism was wrong.


Yet, you express no regret about smearing a whole religion, wrongly...


Because, you accomplished your goal, which was to smear and marginalize your enemies.


That is was based on false premises, is irrelevant to a liberal.

It seems it IS his beliefs that caused him to do what he did.


Nope. It seems it is his sexual addition that caused it.


You want it to be his faith, so that you can use this to attack Christians.

Long was deeply religious and had been kicked out of his parents home the night before or watching porn on line.




And? Are you thinking that just saying "deeply religious" in this thread proves something?

Here's the link again.


Excerpt:

Tyler Bayless said he shared a housing unit with Long at Maverick Recovery, a rehab facility in Roswell, Georgia, between August 2019 and January or February 2020. He said that most residents were suffering from drug or alcohol addiction, but Long was being treated for sex addiction.
"It was something that absolutely would torture him," Bayless said. He said Long was a "deeply religious person -- he would often go on tangents about his interpretation of the Bible," and was distraught about his addiction to sex.
Bayless said that on multiple occasions during his stay at the facility, Long told him that he had "relapsed" and "gone to massage parlors explicitly to engage in sex acts."
After hearing Long was the suspect in the shootings, Bayless said he was shocked that his former roommate would do such a thing.
Mason Clements, who is listed as the registered agent at Maverick Recovery in business filings, said in a text message that "I am unable to comment on any client past, present or future due to confidentiality agreements."
Another former roommate of Long's also told CNN that Long had been in rehabilitation for sex addiction, and that in summer 2020 he had lived with Long at a transition house for people leaving rehab, though he declined to name the facility or divulge the state where it's located. He said he had not spoken to Long "in a long time."



Yes, got it. You aren't making a point other than mentioning "religious" in a context where it could be spun to look bad.


If I was in a thread about a crime by some black guy and all I did was keep referencing that he was black, as though it meant something, what would you say?

It's hardly a stretch to say his religious beliefs inspired what he did. I am a Christian BUT that does not mean you have to defend anything anyone ever does because of whatever beliefs they have been taught.

So many people (you) have this idea that you have to defend and deflect anything you see as harming your beliefs.

This is no way affects my beliefs.


It kind of is. Lots of people are Christians and don't kill prostitutes.

Christianity, that I was taught, never talked about "removing temptations" by murder.

These crimes do not harm my beliefs.


What does is, the attempt to link Christianity to a mass murder, on weak grounds.


Genesis 38:24 - And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she [is] with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Jesus did away with the laws of the OT.


Technically, no, he didn't.....he stated he wasn't there to change any of the laws...

Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, a justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses.

Act 13:39


Yeah...doesn't apply...this, however....

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.


Of course it applies. The laws of Moses predicted the coming of Jesus and Jesus was there to fulfill those words.

Prostitution was a stoning offense under the old law but what did Jesus say?


Did he abolish that law? No, he said those without sin cast the first stone....

Right, which was counter to the law.


Did he abolish the law?

Yes, his words abolished the law. Was she stoned?

Did he bring the legislature together to hold a vote to overturn the laws? No.

Was she stoned as the law commanded?


You said he got rid of the laws...he didn't.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top