JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
Good for you, PMH.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conservatives in the lat 1700s were Tories....The conservatives have been bitching about the Court for more than 200 years.
Nothing will change.
Hmmm ... interesting! The Court system in the USA was created by Conservative Christians. The first Supreme Court Justice was John Jay:
John Jay - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaJohn Jay (December 12, 1745 – May 17, 1829) was an American statesman, Patriot, diplomat, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, signer of the Treaty of Paris, and first Chief Justice of the United States (1789–95).
*snip*
As a leader of the new Federalist Party, Jay was the Governor of New York State (1795–1801), where he became the state's leading opponent of slavery. His first two attempts to end slavery in New York in 1777 and 1785 failed, but a third in 1799 succeeded.
*snip*
Jay was a member of the Church of England, and later of the Protestant Episcopal Church in America after the American Revolution. Since 1785, Jay had been a warden of Trinity Church, New York.
So what? What's important is that it's independent, NOT who founded it. Just as FDR was slapped down for wanting to pack the court, today's conservatives need to be smacked down for attempting to destroy its independence.As long as we agree that the Judicial system (one branch of our triune, governmental system) was the brainchild of Christian conservatives then my point is made and I shall move on.
So what? What's important is that it's independent, NOT who founded it. Just as FDR was slapped down for wanting to pack the court, today's conservatives need to be smacked down for attempting to destroy its independence.As long as we agree that the Judicial system (one branch of our triune, governmental system) was the brainchild of Christian conservatives then my point is made and I shall move on.
So what? What's important is that it's independent, NOT who founded it. Just as FDR was slapped down for wanting to pack the court, today's conservatives need to be smacked down for attempting to destroy its independence.As long as we agree that the Judicial system (one branch of our triune, governmental system) was the brainchild of Christian conservatives then my point is made and I shall move on.
You don't seem to realize the US is a republic, NOT a democracy subject to the whims of mob rule.The Court isn't "independent." It's answerable to the Constitution and the People (true government) of the USA. Rogue Judges have no business foisting their personal whims upon the whole of the United States and its citizens. Catering to the demands of a small "special interest group" isn't what they're hired to do.
So what? What's important is that it's independent, NOT who founded it. Just as FDR was slapped down for wanting to pack the court, today's conservatives need to be smacked down for attempting to destroy its independence.As long as we agree that the Judicial system (one branch of our triune, governmental system) was the brainchild of Christian conservatives then my point is made and I shall move on.
The Court isn't "independent." It's answerable to the Constitution and the People (true government) of the USA. Rogue Judges have no business foisting their personal whims upon the whole of the United States and its citizens. Catering to the demands of a small "special interest group" isn't what they're hired to do.
Do you agree with Ben Carson?
Ben Carson Congress Should Remove Judges Who Rule For Gay Marriage"When judges do not carry out their duties in an appropriate way, our Congress actually has the right to reprimand or remove them," Carson said. Any law on marriage should be decided by a popular referendum, and any decisions made by courts are "unconstitutional," justifying dismissal of judges, he added.
Later on in the interview, Carson agreed with Deace that ongoing spread of legalized gay marriage would make it “open season on Christians
So, guys, what do you think about popular referendum? In my opinion it's a good idea because we are proud of American democracy and we can demonstrate our will and consciousness to the whole World. Hm? Is it possible?
Yes! Activist Judges (with poor judgment) should be removed from positions of power when their single word rules over popular vote and the general will of a nation. The Constitution does not give "special rights" to the mentally ill or to sexual deviants so Federal Judges have no business brushing the Constitution aside in favor of the demands of a "special interest group."
All judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
Do you agree with Ben Carson?
Ben Carson Congress Should Remove Judges Who Rule For Gay Marriage"When judges do not carry out their duties in an appropriate way, our Congress actually has the right to reprimand or remove them," Carson said. Any law on marriage should be decided by a popular referendum, and any decisions made by courts are "unconstitutional," justifying dismissal of judges, he added.
Later on in the interview, Carson agreed with Deace that ongoing spread of legalized gay marriage would make it “open season on Christians
So, guys, what do you think about popular referendum? In my opinion it's a good idea because we are proud of American democracy and we can demonstrate our will and consciousness to the whole World. Hm? Is it possible?
I'll start you off: 5 Types of Law in the US Legal System Notes flashcards QuizletAll judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
This perception is as ignorant as it is bizarre.So what? What's important is that it's independent, NOT who founded it. Just as FDR was slapped down for wanting to pack the court, today's conservatives need to be smacked down for attempting to destroy its independence.As long as we agree that the Judicial system (one branch of our triune, governmental system) was the brainchild of Christian conservatives then my point is made and I shall move on.
The Court isn't "independent." It's answerable to the Constitution and the People (true government) of the USA. Rogue Judges have no business foisting their personal whims upon the whole of the United States and its citizens. Catering to the demands of a small "special interest group" isn't what they're hired to do.
Learn how laws are created in this country. The local fire codes aren't written by Congress dummy, and neither was the Miranda warning.I'll start you off: 5 Types of Law in the US Legal System Notes flashcards QuizletAll judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states." So only congress can write federal laws. Presidents, judges, and bureaucrats cannot, though they do it all the time. THINK
Name any laws "written" by a judge. Any will do.All judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
Name any law written by a President, judge or bureaucrat. Any will do.I'll start you off: 5 Types of Law in the US Legal System Notes flashcards QuizletAll judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states." So only congress can write federal laws. Presidents, judges, and bureaucrats cannot, though they do it all the time. THINK
Yeah, because what we really want are a bunch of uneducated kids running around with nothing to do all day, but steal your guns while you are at work. Morons here, total fucking morons.Name any laws "written" by a judge. Any will do.All judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
I could give a million but i'll give you the worst of all - Plyler vs doe 1982. In that case the scotus wrote a law forcing states to provide free k-12 for illegal aliens.
They did not write a law, they struck down an unConstitutional law. Getting rid of a law is NOT writing a law. Try again.Name any laws "written" by a judge. Any will do.All judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
I could give a million but i'll give you the worst of all - Plyler vs doe 1982. In that case the scotus wrote a law forcing states to provide free k-12 for illegal aliens.
All judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
He's clueless, even with with the links I gave him, and wants to remain so apparently.All judges who write laws should be removed. The constitution says only congress can write laws.
You have no idea what a law is.