Should the U.S. Constitution be superseded by the religion of Modern Liberalism?

[candycorn]

Perhaps the OP would do us the favor of pointing out any religion that doesn't have a unifying text, a deity, or

Liberalism isn't a religion as there is no deity, unifying text, or sacraments. You continue to surpass your own records for most inept poster ever.

WOW, a new definition of "religion"!

When you can't win an argument, make up new "facts", eh candycorn?

Sad. But typical. What else can you expect from someone who goes completely against the Supreme Law of the Land?

Perhaps the OP would do us the favor of pointing out any religion that doesn't have a unifying text, a deity, or
sacraments recognized by the Church???

Those are the basics of a religion. Liberalism is not a religion since it has none of those

PS: I won the argument already. You should get used to being my bitch.

 

[candycorn]

Nothing supercedes the Constitution in the United States,

oooh really ? so you would have no problem with impeaching the muslime mulatto scumbag in the W.H. who has violated so much of the Constitution it would take months to read the articles of impeachment.

I would love to see it to. Bring it on.

OH wait; the republicans are too much of a pussy to back up their tough talk.

 

[Syriusly]

Nothing supercedes the Constitution in the United States,

oooh really ? so you would have no problem with impeaching the muslime mulatto scumbag in the W.H. who has violated so much of the Constitution it would take months to read the articles of impeachment.

I would love for every single one of the Republican candidates for President to use your exact words.

Nothing would help solidify the image of the RNC as the party of Racists more.

 

[Bfgrn]

Several people have complained about those who try to use government to implement their own religion as law, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

How about people who believe that the religion of Modern Liberalism should supersede the Constitution? They support taxation to transfer funds directly to various special interest groups (forbidden by the Const), and govt getting involved in workplace conditions, land zoning, local environmental conditions, medical insurance, retirement funding, unemployment compensation in various forms, and even the size of our toilets and the kinds of light bulbs we can buy - all functions forbidden to the Fed govt by the Constitution, and reserved instead to the States and the People.

Modern liberalism is a religion, of course: There is no proof that it works (and plenty of evidence to show it doesn't), it is perceived as different things by different people in different places, it requires absolute faith and devotion to its ideals without question, and seeks to destroy anyone who doesn't unquestioningly obey and proselytize it requirements. Its devotees dare not mention its name, and regularly castigate anyone who applied ANY spoken name to it ("We're NOT socialists! We're NOT communists! Don't you DARE call us that! We're NOT....", etc.). And they can tolerate no other religion except Modern Liberalism. They regard anyone who disagrees, as not only wrong but evil.

Does your view that "there is no religion that supersedes the Constitution", include the religion of Modern Liberalism? What do you propose we should to with the people already in office, who are clearly fanatical devotees to that religion and regularly violate the Constitution to make laws implementing their religion in its place?

Victim-hood...the right wing mantra...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Several people have complained about those who try to use government to implement their own religion as law, in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

How about people who believe that the religion of Modern Liberalism should supersede the Constitution? They support taxation to transfer funds directly to various special interest groups (forbidden by the Const), and govt getting involved in workplace conditions, land zoning, local environmental conditions, medical insurance, retirement funding, unemployment compensation in various forms, and even the size of our toilets and the kinds of light bulbs we can buy - all functions forbidden to the Fed govt by the Constitution, and reserved instead to the States and the People.

Modern liberalism is a religion, of course: There is no proof that it works (and plenty of evidence to show it doesn't), it is perceived as different things by different people in different places, it requires absolute faith and devotion to its ideals without question, and seeks to destroy anyone who doesn't unquestioningly obey and proselytize it requirements. Its devotees dare not mention its name, and regularly castigate anyone who applied ANY spoken name to it ("We're NOT socialists! We're NOT communists! Don't you DARE call us that! We're NOT....", etc.). And they can tolerate no other religion except Modern Liberalism. They regard anyone who disagrees, as not only wrong but evil.

Does your view that "there is no religion that supersedes the Constitution", include the religion of Modern Liberalism? What do you propose we should to with the people already in office, who are clearly fanatical devotees to that religion and regularly violate the Constitution to make laws implementing their religion in its place?

In case you missed it,

The Constitution in its current form supports what you call modern Liberalism.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Again, there is no 'liberal religion,' 'modern' or otherwise.

Liberal fanatics believe completely in the supremacy of Government over the individual. Their faith is all-consuming, which is necessary since there is little actual evidence to back it up. These conditions are common to many religions.

They basically regard Government the way savages regard idols. It can do anything, provide anything, and it will be free (or at least, paid for by Someone Else).

The fact that nearly everything Government tries to do fails, does little to dissuade the faithful leftists from their belief that more and more programs should be assigned to Government. When liberals (from either party) are in charge, Government grows continuously, and sometimes spectacularly. Great edifices are built to it, from which The Word is handed down from afar to regulate and control everyone. And The Word is not to be questioned, or disobeyed. Except by the liberal fanatics who hand it down, of course, when it proves too inconvenient.

People who disagree, or who dispute Government's omniscience, are regarded as not just wrong, but Evil. Strenuous efforts are made to convert them to total obeisance to Government with no remaining sign of their former disagreement. Or, failing that, to completely destroy them.

Liberalism has more of the characteristics of a religion, than many religions do.

So, what should we do about the many people currently in elected office, who keep trying to make laws to impose their religion of Liberalism on the rest of us, in defiance of the U.S. Constitution?

 

[candycorn]

Again, there is no 'liberal religion,' 'modern' or otherwise.

Liberal fanatics believe completely in the supremacy of Government over the individual. Their faith is all-consuming, which is necessary since there is little actual evidence to back it up. These conditions are common to many religions.

Total bullshit.

Wanting equal pay for women isn't government supremacy; it's logical equality.
Wanting a woman to have the right to privacy isn't government supremacy, it's logical equality.
Wanting equal rights for gays and lesbians isn't government supremacy, it's logical equality.

The avenues to attain these goals did go through the government. As provided by the Constitution in the First Amendment:

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

What you're seeing is the Constitution at work.

What you're feeling is that tenants of bigotry, favoritism, and plain old hate and prejudice are no longer popular. And that hurts morons like you.

Good.

They basically regard Government the way savages regard idols. It can do anything, provide anything, and it will be free (or at least, paid for by Someone Else).

Now this is particularly hilarious. Government does defend the rights of individuals who are being wronged. Do you think it shouldn't? Of course you do. For the rest of us with brains....we've evolved. As for "being paid by someone else", liberals have paid more in taxes than you have ever made in your miserable "life" schumuck.

The fact that nearly everything Government tries to do fails,

Schools are integrated.
Man has walked on the moon.
We've conquered every other native person on this landmass.
We've harnessed the powers of the rivers
We have the highest standard of living in the history of mankind
We have the greatest colleges and universities of any nation (for how much longer is an open question)
We have an abundance of safe food, safe water, and safe medicines.
We have the greatest (or at least one of the greatest) collections of protected lands of any nation on Earth.

All ensured by the Government and the people that it represents; over the shrill objections of losers like you.

So, what should we do about the many people currently in elected office, who keep trying to make laws to impose their religion of Liberalism on the rest of us, in defiance of the U.S. Constitution?

Find out the definition of religion before you embarrass yourself further.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Apparently the liberals can only shout over and over that modern Liberalism "isn't a religion"...

...while carefully ignoring the many similarities it has to established religions.

If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck..... Liberals will always claim it's not a duck!

 

[candycorn]

Apparently the liberals can only shout over and over that modern Liberalism "isn't a religion"...

...while carefully ignoring the many similarities it has to established religions.

If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck..... Liberals will always claim it's not a duck!

Not always

You sound like a dumbass.
You make dumbass correlations.
The correlations could only be seen by other dumbasses.

If it looks like a dumbass, sounds like a dumbass, and draws conclusions like a dumbass, then it must be Little-Acorn ; a true dumbass

 

[Jantje_Smit]

So, what should we do about the many people currently in elected office, who keep trying to make laws to impose their religion of Liberalism on the rest of us, in defiance of the U.S. Constitution?

Seems there's nothing you can do about it, except buy some more guns, bibles and duct tape and prepare to resist the liberal stormtroopers when they want to put you in one of the FEMA concentration camps.