OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
First of all, I doubt you would be getting much revenue from that 70% tax bracket, cuz most rich guys won't be paying it, just like they didn't in the 1950s and 60s. They'll be putting their money in assets or investments that aren't subject to that ridiculous rate. Those rich people in the fortune 500 that make more than $10 mil? Gone. They'll be moving to Canada or somewhere else, or at least their money will be going offshore, you can bet on that. Corp HQs won't be in the US, they'll move to Ireland or somewhere.
My question is, what are the lower tax brackets? What would the rate be for the guy making only $1 mil? $2 mil? $5 mil? Where is the breakdown?
Consider this:
. Super-wealthy families often keep their wealth in the form of investments and other assets that can be converted into taxable income on their own schedule. Jeff Bezos may be worth $160 billion, but in 2017 he reportedly paid himself an annual salary of just $81,840, with total compensation (including deductible expenses) of $1.6 million. Taxing 70 percent of all salary and wages above $10 million (or even $1 million) would not even touch the Amazon founder.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s 70 Percent Tax Cannot Finance Socialism | National Review
BTW, I'm a retiree on a fixed income south of $40k/yr, if anyone cares.
Right, and Lebron James who is due to make 35 Mil a year would take a big hit, Which would be kind of interesting in the sports world. Suddenly all those guys making the super max contracts would be just taking home the same as the run of the mill guys.
My guess is that you don't understand that all of these "super max contracts" are corporations or corporate trusts that currently PAY 1.5% of revenue under tRump.