Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The treaties only allow asylum seekers from Cuba, Mexico and Canada to come to the USA. Asylum seekers have to seek asylum in the NEAREST safe country to theirs. Also economic difficulties or criminal activities are reasonable causes for asylum. Only immediate threats to life or safety.can't do it the laws and treaties prohibit that, Title 42 was a joke, it is for stopping the spread of diseases and that isn't needed nor can it be used now.. Come on experts, you have all these imaginary ideas that won't ever happen. You have to find your way around these treaties and domestic and international laws.
Then they will go home and spread the word that the Norte gravy train has stopped.What is going to happen when the sick and dying are given a blanket and a spot in the parking lot? When they go to the food bank and it's closed. When the hotels, schools, and prisons are full and they have to fight for a place on the sidewalk. That's what it is coming to.
Some will. Some will just take what they think they were promised.Then they will go home and spread the word that the Norte gravy train has stopped.
None of that is true , The treaties are international treaties signed by every civilized country in the world . So you are trying to tell us that only Cuba Mexico and Canada are allowed to ask for asylum. , They state clearly the opposite of what you are saying about having to be only from a neighbor country , You have to accept people from all countries throughout the world. International law says the same thing, and domestic law does also. People who are threatened by immigrants have been trying to write law for years to stop them , but it won't work because the courts stop them , Because of our law that controls what has to be done as far as Asylum seekers. There is no court that will change this now and as far as I can see into the future. These haters hate Immigrants in a country that is made up of 100% immigrants. Only the haters want this done, Our law supports asylum seekers by two treaties, multiple domestic law and international law. There are lots of haters in this country but nowhere near the number that it will take for the public to support these haters. The law is clear so the courts won't help the haters either and to boot, 90% of what the haters says are lies about these asylum seekers. When push comes to shove and the truth is made clear, there will only be the haters that would push against a massive majority over this hate group they call a party. Population wise, a lot of conservatives won't support the MAGAS hate on this subject.The treaties only allow asylum seekers from Cuba, Mexico and Canada to come to the USA. Asylum seekers have to seek asylum in the NEAREST safe country to theirs. Also economic difficulties or criminal activities are reasonable causes for asylum. Only immediate threats to life or safety.
Goofball there are no invaders , that's just comical. It quite clear to me that you haven't been following this thread. Tell us how you are going to get the laws and treaties changed that protects asylum seekers in every civilized country in the world. Tell me how we can legally stop asylum seekers. You have the laws against you ,the court against you and the majority of this country against you .Open your eyes. The invaders are using the asylum system as a work around from the normal immigration process. We need to stop this end around play
Kill zone, your ass is out of here. No crazies allowed. Your Roosevelt Rule is in only three states, and it is on our side of the border, and it is made up of reservations. You think the Native Americans will help your ugly hate cause. You want to try to share your gun Bubba bulshit about killing people , go someplace else. These termites have to be dumped.Using the Roosevelt rule: US Military colud push the border 50-100 miles south. Make it a kill zone. Case closed//
Kill zone, your ass is out of here. No crazies allowed. Your Roosevelt Rule is in only three states, and it is on our side of the border, and it is made up of reservations. You think the Native Americans will help your ugly hate cause. You want to try to share your gun Bubba bulshit about killing people , go someplace else. These termites have to be dumped.
You're a legend in your own mind.Your ass is out of here.you don't get to try to sell your killing Nazism here ever. Not on my watch.
How would these haters pick who as immigrants would be allowed in this country, We already know that considering the level of their bigotry and hatred of other religions other than theirs. They would be selected by the color of their skin and the religion that they believe in. Every dictator in history has done that. The most obvious of course would be the Nazis'.
I thought you said that you "dumped" EvilCat Breath 's ass?
By "dump his ass," did you mean "allowed him to live rent free" in your head?
What is going to happen when the sick and dying are given a blanket and a spot in the parking lot? When they go to the food bank and it's closed. When the hotels, schools, and prisons are full and they have to fight for a place on the sidewalk. That's what it is coming to.
Unilaterally withdraw from the treaties.Goofball there are no invaders , that's just comical. It quite clear to me that you haven't been following this thread. Tell us how you are going to get the laws and treaties changed that protects asylum seekers in every civilized country in the world. Tell me how we can legally stop asylum seekers. You have the laws against you ,the court against you and the majority of this country against you .
Kill zone, your ass is out of here. No crazies allowed. Your Roosevelt Rule is in only three states, and it is on our side of the border, and it is made up of reservations. You think the Native Americans will help your ugly hate cause. You want to try to share your gun Bubba bulshit about killing people , go someplace else. These termites have to be dumped.
You're a legend in your own mind.You want to promote killing people here, then find some idiot that will allow you , I won't. I just dumped leftwinger because of that, and I will dump anyone else that tries to bring their ugliness and hatred threatening to kill people , into any of my threads.
Show us, then.None of that is true , The treaties are international treaties signed by every civilized country in the world . So you are trying to tell us that only Cuba Mexico and Canada are allowed to ask for asylum. , They state clearly the opposite of what you are saying about having to be only from a neighbor country , You have to accept people from all countries throughout the world. International law says the same thing, and domestic law does also.
Asylum is still a discretionary option. Admitance of any or all refugees is at the discretion of the U.S. Government, using the guidelines set by the executive branch.People who are threatened by immigrants have been trying to write law for years to stop them , but it won't work because the courts stop them , Because of our law that controls what has to be done as far as Asylum seekers. There is no court that will change this now and as far as I can see into the future. These haters hate Immigrants in a country that is made up of 100% immigrants. Only the haters want this done, Our law supports asylum seekers by two treaties, multiple domestic law and international law. There are lots of haters in this country but nowhere near the number that it will take for the public to support these haters. The law is clear so the courts won't help the haters either and to boot, 90% of what the haters says are lies about these asylum seekers.
You must not be keeping up with current events. The lastest "haters," are Black Americans in Chicago, most of whom have voted exclusively (D) all their lives and who are waking up to how the Democrats are attacking them using migrants as shock troops.When push comes to shove and the truth is made clear, there will only be the haters that would push against a massive majority over this hate group they call a party. Population wise, a lot of conservatives won't support the MAGAS hate on this subject.
www.wsj.com
thepostmillennial.com
What do you mean "the next" conversation?Isn't it amusing how they(the MAGA's)build their whole opinion on lies and if you take away their lies they just disappear and move onto the next conversation.
According to the treaties, asylum seekers MUST seek asylum inNone of that is true , The treaties are international treaties signed by every civilized country in the world . So you are trying to tell us that only Cuba Mexico and Canada are allowed to ask for asylum. , They state clearly the opposite of what you are saying about having to be only from a neighbor country , You have to accept people from all countries throughout the world. International law says the same thing, and domestic law does also. People who are threatened by immigrants have been trying to write law for years to stop them , but it won't work because the courts stop them , Because of our law that controls what has to be done as far as Asylum seekers. There is no court that will change this now and as far as I can see into the future. These haters hate Immigrants in a country that is made up of 100% immigrants. Only the haters want this done, Our law supports asylum seekers by two treaties, multiple domestic law and international law. There are lots of haters in this country but nowhere near the number that it will take for the public to support these haters. The law is clear so the courts won't help the haters either and to boot, 90% of what the haters says are lies about these asylum seekers. When push comes to shove and the truth is made clear, there will only be the haters that would push against a massive majority over this hate group they call a party. Population wise, a lot of conservatives won't support the MAGAS hate on this subject.
For the third time you are wrong, The 51 version had some limitations but the 67 Protocol which is the one we signed has no limits at all You are totally wrong, and I've told you that now three times, why is this important to you. 1951 Refugee Convention or the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 , "The 1967 Protocol removed the time limits and applied to refugees "without any geographic limitation" but declarations previously made by parties to the Convention on geographic scope were grandfathered.[7]" Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees - WikipediaAccording to the treaties, asylum seekers MUST seek asylum in
the NEAREST safe country. Which means only Cuba, Canada and Mexico are the only countries without intervening safe countries between them and the USA. Any Central or South American country has at least ONE safe country between it and the USA. These aren’t legitimate asylum seekers, they are economic or social refugees and not covered by the treaties on asylum seekers.
