Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mostly it's just a bunch of bots and funded shills talking to each other.
Mostly it's just a bunch of bots and funded shills talking to each other.
No, dude, that is not what artificial intelligence is.
Good Gawd.
If that were the case it would show Hilly winningMostly it's just a bunch of bots and funded shills talking to each other.
No, dude, that is not what artificial intelligence is.
Good Gawd.
I'm aware.
But that is what the AI is actually measuring.
Yeah, watch this and tell me he is a partisan GOPer.Comey is a partisan GOPer...
But that is what the AI is actually measuring.
so you have looked at the code?
If that were the case it would show Hilly winningMostly it's just a bunch of bots and funded shills talking to each other.
No, dude, that is not what artificial intelligence is.
Good Gawd.
I'm aware.
But that is what the AI is actually measuring.
It amazes me that so few people have any actual concept of how AI works.If that were the case it would show Hilly winning
But that is what the AI is actually measuring.
AI system finds Trump will win the White House and is more popular than Obama in 2008
MogIA was developed by Sanjiv Rai, founder of Indian start-up Genic.ai. It takes in 20 million data points from public platforms including Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube in the U.S. and then analyzes the information to create predictions.
The AI system was created in 2004, so it has been getting smarter all the time. It had already correctly predicted the results of the Democratic and Republican Primaries.
Data such as engagement with tweets or Facebook Live videos have been taken into account. The result is that Trump has overtaken the engagement numbers of Barack Obama's peak in 2008 — the year he was elected president — by 25 percent.
You obviously dont know what the hell you are talking about, once again.
The AI has been adjusting for such things since 2004, learning from every election what indicators are more important and which are not.Not necessarily. The article even stated that the AI could not parse out sentiment.
Thus, controlled agitation on digital means could be bringing up Trump topics, only b/c there is interest, only to have folks collectively bitch about him.
I apologize for being too direct. My Aspergers causes me to over react at times.You know Jim, I like you, but you are becoming as nasty as the zombie Hillary supporters.
Okay, I'll trust you on that. Data aggregation, metadata analysis, and the SoA in Comp. Processing is not my expertise.The AI has been adjusting for such things since 2004, learning from every election what indicators are more important and which are not.Not necessarily. The article even stated that the AI could not parse out sentiment.
Thus, controlled agitation on digital means could be bringing up Trump topics, only b/c there is interest, only to have folks collectively bitch about him.
It is not simply counting posts on FB and the like.
OK, you show you know the buzzwords at least, so why are you being.....difficult?Okay, I'll trust you on that. Data aggregation, metadata analysis, and the SoA in Comp. Processing is not my expertise.
I am, by nature, skeptical of anything printed in corporate media.OK, you show you know the buzzwords at least, so why are you being.....difficult?Okay, I'll trust you on that. Data aggregation, metadata analysis, and the SoA in Comp. Processing is not my expertise.
Except it hasnt missed yetAI is usually not so. Humans are generally better. That's why I'd rather go with the guy with a track record.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus
