So after the two Sheriff officers are shot, Joe Biden wants to ban Assault Rifles and large cap magazines.

[Mac-7]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Scalia in Heller made clear that Felons and the Mentally ill should never own, possess or have in their custody and control a firearm. Common sense gun control works to lessen the carnage in other nation states, that is civilized nation-states. People like Pete are not civilized.

Scalia removed, "shall not be infringed" from the 2nd A. and was supported by four other conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Moron........you don't know what you are talking about....he never said never he just said that some laws are allowed but you completely ignore everything else he said.....as in the fact that AR-15 rifles are protected by the 2nd Amendment....you don't want to admit that.....or that all bearable arms are protected by the 2nd Amendment...you don't want to admit that....

What he actually said...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

What you want to pretend doesn't exist...

Scalia ....on which arms are protected...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

And so, since you are quoting Scalia...how about you also quote this......

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

I didn't mention the types of "Arms" bearable, I responded to common sense gun controls.

Q. How do we control keeping bearable arms from the hands of Felons and the Mentally ill?

Do you believe that among these 5 million owners of AR-style Semis, there are not felons, not seriously mentally ill or have not converted their semi into fully auto?

View attachment 389371

There are now over 18 million of them in private hands, after Scalia wrote that opinion........

And do you acknowledge that the AR-15 rifle is protected by the 2nd Amendment?

Not many AR-15 owners will be able go keep them if biden wins in november

 

[easyt65]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Joe Biden wants to go after legally owned weapons while police are arresting law-abiding citizens for holding legally-owned weapons on their own property in defense of their lives, families' lives, and their property from trespassing criminals and domestic terrorists threatening them. their homes are then raided, and all of their legally owned weapons are confiscated while they are charged with FELONIES (and anyone convicted of a Felony can no longer own a gun).

YES, they ARE coming for your 2nd Amendment Rights and your guns!

 

[bendog]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Scalia in Heller made clear that Felons and the Mentally ill should never own, possess or have in their custody and control a firearm. Common sense gun control works to lessen the carnage in other nation states, that is civilized nation-states. People like Pete are not civilized.

Scalia removed, "shall not be infringed" from the 2nd A. and was supported by four other conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Moron........you don't know what you are talking about....he never said never he just said that some laws are allowed but you completely ignore everything else he said.....as in the fact that AR-15 rifles are protected by the 2nd Amendment....you don't want to admit that.....or that all bearable arms are protected by the 2nd Amendment...you don't want to admit that....

What he actually said...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

What you want to pretend doesn't exist...

Scalia ....on which arms are protected...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

And so, since you are quoting Scalia...how about you also quote this......

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

I didn't mention the types of "Arms" bearable, I responded to common sense gun controls.

Q. How do we control keeping bearable arms from the hands of Felons and the Mentally ill?

Do you believe that among these 5 million owners of AR-style Semis, there are not felons, not seriously mentally ill or have not converted their semi into fully auto?

View attachment 389371

There are now over 18 million of them in private hands, after Scalia wrote that opinion........

And do you acknowledge that the AR-15 rifle is protected by the 2nd Amendment?

Not many AR-15 owners will be able go keep them if biden wins in november

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Personally I think it's way too late to cap capacities at 10 for pistols too.

Localities will continue to have the power to enact some regulations just as they do now.

It's just Biden reaching out to part of the dem base.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Scalia in Heller made clear that Felons and the Mentally ill should never own, possess or have in their custody and control a firearm. Common sense gun control works to lessen the carnage in other nation states, that is civilized nation-states. People like Pete are not civilized.

Scalia removed, "shall not be infringed" from the 2nd A. and was supported by four other conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Moron........you don't know what you are talking about....he never said never he just said that some laws are allowed but you completely ignore everything else he said.....as in the fact that AR-15 rifles are protected by the 2nd Amendment....you don't want to admit that.....or that all bearable arms are protected by the 2nd Amendment...you don't want to admit that....

What he actually said...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

What you want to pretend doesn't exist...

Scalia ....on which arms are protected...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

And so, since you are quoting Scalia...how about you also quote this......

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

I didn't mention the types of "Arms" bearable, I responded to common sense gun controls.

Q. How do we control keeping bearable arms from the hands of Felons and the Mentally ill?

Do you believe that among these 5 million owners of AR-style Semis, there are not felons, not seriously mentally ill or have not converted their semi into fully auto?

View attachment 389371

You really can't keep them from felons whether we have a law just against them, or the government confiscates guns from all people. Criminals will always get guns if they want them, just like illegal narcotics.

If a lowlife is going to rob a convenience store, chance he may have to shoot and kill somebody to get the money he wants, the last thing he's worried about is if his gun is legal.

You have to understand that since liberal judges turned our prisons into playgrounds, prison is not a real deterrent for people who think that way. Make prisons like in the movie Cool Hand Luke, and you'll see how much of a deterrent prisons become.

 

[2aguy]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Scalia in Heller made clear that Felons and the Mentally ill should never own, possess or have in their custody and control a firearm. Common sense gun control works to lessen the carnage in other nation states, that is civilized nation-states. People like Pete are not civilized.

Scalia removed, "shall not be infringed" from the 2nd A. and was supported by four other conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Moron........you don't know what you are talking about....he never said never he just said that some laws are allowed but you completely ignore everything else he said.....as in the fact that AR-15 rifles are protected by the 2nd Amendment....you don't want to admit that.....or that all bearable arms are protected by the 2nd Amendment...you don't want to admit that....

What he actually said...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

What you want to pretend doesn't exist...

Scalia ....on which arms are protected...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

And so, since you are quoting Scalia...how about you also quote this......

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

I didn't mention the types of "Arms" bearable, I responded to common sense gun controls.

Q. How do we control keeping bearable arms from the hands of Felons and the Mentally ill?

Do you believe that among these 5 million owners of AR-style Semis, there are not felons, not seriously mentally ill or have not converted their semi into fully auto?

View attachment 389371

There are now over 18 million of them in private hands, after Scalia wrote that opinion........

And do you acknowledge that the AR-15 rifle is protected by the 2nd Amendment?

Not many AR-15 owners will be able go keep them if biden wins in november

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Personally I think it's way too late to cap capacities at 10 for pistols too.

Localities will continue to have the power to enact some regulations just as they do now.

It's just Biden reaching out to part of the dem base.

Sorry....you don't understand what they plan to do...

1) stack the courts, likely including the Supreme Court, with anti-gun judges, then, they will use local and state democrat party controlled governments to pass anti-gun laws...which will then be declared constitutional by the left wing judges.

2) The will end the lawful commerce in arms act.....which will turn loose every democrat party lawyer to sue gun stores and gun makers....putting them out of business.

3) They will use the Department of Justice to sue gun makers into adopting federally mandated gun control regulations......

It will be an all out offensive against the 2nd Amendment...and those are just off the top of my head.....

The taxes, fees, and regulations they will put on the ownership of currently owned guns will do the work for them......they will use the ATF to get a lot of that done.

 

[2aguy]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Scalia in Heller made clear that Felons and the Mentally ill should never own, possess or have in their custody and control a firearm. Common sense gun control works to lessen the carnage in other nation states, that is civilized nation-states. People like Pete are not civilized.

Scalia removed, "shall not be infringed" from the 2nd A. and was supported by four other conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Moron........you don't know what you are talking about....he never said never he just said that some laws are allowed but you completely ignore everything else he said.....as in the fact that AR-15 rifles are protected by the 2nd Amendment....you don't want to admit that.....or that all bearable arms are protected by the 2nd Amendment...you don't want to admit that....

What he actually said...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

What you want to pretend doesn't exist...

Scalia ....on which arms are protected...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

And so, since you are quoting Scalia...how about you also quote this......

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

I didn't mention the types of "Arms" bearable, I responded to common sense gun controls.

Q. How do we control keeping bearable arms from the hands of Felons and the Mentally ill?

Do you believe that among these 5 million owners of AR-style Semis, there are not felons, not seriously mentally ill or have not converted their semi into fully auto?

View attachment 389371

You really can't keep them from felons whether we have a law just against them, or the government confiscates guns from all people. Criminals will always get guns if they want them, just like illegal narcotics.

If a lowlife is going to rob a convenience store, chance he may have to shoot and kill somebody to get the money he wants, the last thing he's worried about is if his gun is legal.

You have to understand that since liberal judges turned our prisons into playgrounds, prison is not a real deterrent for people who think that way. Make prisons like in the movie Cool Hand Luke, and you'll see how much of a deterrent prisons become.

And more important....the revolving door the democrat party has put in place for violent gun offenders........they keep releasing violent gun offenders, the ones doing over 90% of the gun crime in this country.

 

[Mac-7]

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Nonsense

if dems control the congress and white house they can ban firearms with just a snap of their fingers

 

[bendog]

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Nonsense

if dems control the congress and white house they can ban firearms with just a snap of their fingers

The dems can't do anything of the kind if they want to elect 50 senators. And even that assumes some natl confisication of arms would be const., and it wouldn't be. Worry about something real …. like hordes of blacks overrunning your suburb.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

Scalia in Heller made clear that Felons and the Mentally ill should never own, possess or have in their custody and control a firearm. Common sense gun control works to lessen the carnage in other nation states, that is civilized nation-states. People like Pete are not civilized.

Scalia removed, "shall not be infringed" from the 2nd A. and was supported by four other conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Moron........you don't know what you are talking about....he never said never he just said that some laws are allowed but you completely ignore everything else he said.....as in the fact that AR-15 rifles are protected by the 2nd Amendment....you don't want to admit that.....or that all bearable arms are protected by the 2nd Amendment...you don't want to admit that....

What he actually said...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

What you want to pretend doesn't exist...

Scalia ....on which arms are protected...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

And so, since you are quoting Scalia...how about you also quote this......

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.


Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

I didn't mention the types of "Arms" bearable, I responded to common sense gun controls.

Q. How do we control keeping bearable arms from the hands of Felons and the Mentally ill?

Do you believe that among these 5 million owners of AR-style Semis, there are not felons, not seriously mentally ill or have not converted their semi into fully auto?

View attachment 389371

There are now over 18 million of them in private hands, after Scalia wrote that opinion........

And do you acknowledge that the AR-15 rifle is protected by the 2nd Amendment?

No, I don't believe that shall not be infringed of arms (not exclusively firearms) is how you see it. Gravity, push button and stiletto knives are illegal in many states; Nunchucks are illegal though can be had with a license. I once arrested bookie for having a walking stick with spring loaded stilletto blade operated by a trigger on the curve of the walking stick. It's still on display in the Inspectors Office along with other Arms taken for felons and/or used in violent crimes.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Nonsense

if dems control the congress and white house they can ban firearms with just a snap of their fingers

Idiot-gram ^^^; variety an absurd and impossible claim.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Nonsense

if dems control the congress and white house they can ban firearms with just a snap of their fingers

Idiot-gram ^^^; variety an absurd and impossible claim.

Sorry your Kamala has stated she will use executive orders.

 

[bendog]

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Nonsense

if dems control the congress and white house they can ban firearms with just a snap of their fingers

Idiot-gram ^^^; variety an absurd and impossible claim.

Well, they're Trumpanzees, so they think potuses can do a lot of imaginary things.

 

[Mac-7]

variety an absurd and impossible claim.

I see you and bendog will be the last to know

 

[Mac-7]

Well, they're Trumpanzees

You sure are filled with hate - and childish insults

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Biden pushes gun control less than 24 hours after attempted assassination on deputies

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Sunday called for gun control less than 24 hours after two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded after a gunman open fire on their squad car in an apparent ambush.

www.foxnews.com

It can not be more obvious than ever, from the race riots in the late 60's when the democrook party once again did their best to disarm blacks specifically, the decades of senseless murders in inner cities, and now bed wetters murdering innocent Americans and attacking people at restaurants. Leftists deliberately create chaos and violence, and then demand government disarm everyone who follows the law.

We can not let these pieces of shit win.

.

The Shooting was done with a semi-auto handgun which are legal. The only reason both cops are alive is that it wasn't done by an AR. Of course, the AR would have been harder to conceal so it probably wouldn't have been so easy to get that close. But the shooter wouldn't need to get that close. I agree that the AR is a weapon of war but that has nothing to do with this shooting. You filthy rumpers will use anything to try and make points for your orange deity.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the two cops and their families and I thank God that they are going to be okay.

Gun-grabbing assholes like Biden will use anything to forward their gun grabbing agenda. That is the point of this thread. This had nothing to do with civilian, non-military semi automatic rifles.

And by the way, every firearm is a weapon of war.Firearms were created for war by the Chinese. The purpose of the Second Amendment is war.

I will not rest until it is legal for a felon to carry a fully loaded, ready to fire, belt fed machine gun through a grammar school.

Zero restrictions. If government has it, I get it.

 

[bendog]

Well, they're Trumpanzees

You sure are filled with hate - and childish insults

ur either an idiot or paranoid. As we speak, McConnell has desperately cobbled together anything he could pass with 50Plus to prove ANY stimulus to his vulnerable members in places like Maine Ariz NC and Co .. have you any ability to imagine how it would benefit the gop in places like this if the dems were ever to try national legislation such as your imaginary friend suggests they will do? I doubt it.

 

[DustyInfinity]

I just hope that the rational majority floods the polling stations in Nov and replays the 2010 sweep of democrook filth from our government. I hope the bed wetting lunatics commit suicide or finally keep their promises and leave the country. These pieces of shit have not been "people we just disagree with" in years. They have become the domestic enemies of the COTUS and the Republic. Anyone who seeks to disarm you is not a neighbor, a fellow citizen or an ally of any sort. They're your enemy. They aren't interested in anyone else's safety, they're interests are all about having power over you.

the problem is - trump won the last election and this is what they chose to do about it. whine like little bitches who's pacifier fell out demanding someone else pick it up and make their booboo's better.

that will not change is trump wins again. they will get worse. a lot worse.

My 80 year old mother is cleaning her guns and checking on her ammo because she thinks the democrats will do something stupid after the election. My dad was army, so she has options.

 

[Papageorgio]

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and Regulate them Well!

WTF? You are sputtering pure nonsense. Learn how to write coherently.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Ease your paranoia. Even assuming a national confiscation of previous legal arms was const, and it won't be with this Court, No senator in PA or VA or needing upstate NY votes will vote for it, and the bill would never get to the floor.

Nonsense

if dems control the congress and white house they can ban firearms with just a snap of their fingers

The dems can't do anything of the kind if they want to elect 50 senators. And even that assumes some natl confisication of arms would be const., and it wouldn't be. Worry about something real …. like hordes of blacks overrunning your suburb.

Yeah, you tell him. Worry about something real:

Joe Biden’s Plan to Come After the Firearms Industry | National Review

His political attacks on the industry are why we have a law barring attempts to hold arms manufacturers legally responsible for shootings.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Brain357]

Law enforcement is rarely shot in countries with strong gun control.