So, if sea levels are rising....why is this happening?

westwall

WHEN GUNS ARE BANNED ONLY THE RICH WILL HAVE GUNS
Gold Supporting Member
Apr 21, 2010
99,226
60,544
2,605
Nevada
An ancient forest gobbled up by sea level rise 5,000 years ago has reemerged from the ocean for the first time in a long time!

How is that possible when see level is "inexorably" rising?



“We used to think of this as just as an impenetrable forest — actually this was a complex human environment,” said Martin Bates, a geoarchaeologist at the University of Wales Trinity St. David, who oversees the excavation work in Borth on a beach he played on as a toddler. “The floods have opened our eyes as to what’s really out there.”

Scanning the army of ghostly spikes protruding from the sand here one recent morning, Dr. Bates said it was as if nature were making a point: The recent torrential rains, linked by a growing number of climatologists to human-induced climate change, have provided an ancient laboratory to study how humans coped with catastrophic climate change in the past.

Indeed, across Britain, two consecutive years of exceptional winter weather have left in their wake some equally exceptional discoveries: from unexploded wartime bombs and Victorian shipwrecks to archaeological finds that are nearly a million years old. Scientists have barely kept up. Last winter was the wettest on record, according to the Met Office, the national weather service.






http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/24/science/a-sunken-kingdom-re-emerges.html?_r=1
 
That area flooded 5000 years ago, and has been in the tidal zone ever since. And it's still in the tidal zone. Thus I'm wondering why you thought it was a confirmation of your kooky conspiracy theory that says the whole planet is lying about sea level rise.
 
That area flooded 5000 years ago, and has been in the tidal zone ever since. And it's still in the tidal zone. Thus I'm wondering why you thought it was a confirmation of your kooky conspiracy theory that says the whole planet is lying about sea level rise.

Clearly, one has to wonder.

On the other hand, there are endless stories like this one:

Why the City of Miami Is Doomed to Drown | Politics News | Rolling Stone

20130620-miami-x600-1371747734.jpg
 
Frank, those are natural rock formations. Get a clue. Or maybe tell us about the magical sunken city near Cuba. If you're going to get crazy, go all out.
 
That area flooded 5000 years ago, and has been in the tidal zone ever since. And it's still in the tidal zone. Thus I'm wondering why you thought it was a confirmation of your kooky conspiracy theory that says the whole planet is lying about sea level rise.





And is now being exposed. Logically if sea levels were rising as fast as you claim then this tidal flat should be under at least a foot of water......only it isn't....:eusa_whistle:
 
It was a real eye opener for us to see how much higher the Caribbean Sea was this last visit. The last time we were there was 2010. In just 4 years, we could actually see where the islands were losing land.

If you want to see some of the most beautiful islands in the world, don't wait because, they ARE disappearing.
 
It was a real eye opener for us to see how much higher the Caribbean Sea was this last visit. The last time we were there was 2010. In just 4 years, we could actually see where the islands were losing land.

If you want to see some of the most beautiful islands in the world, don't wait because, they ARE disappearing.

oh, please share these photos that show this change! I bet you don't have any. LOL
 
It was a real eye opener for us to see how much higher the Caribbean Sea was this last visit. The last time we were there was 2010. In just 4 years, we could actually see where the islands were losing land.

If you want to see some of the most beautiful islands in the world, don't wait because, they ARE disappearing.





That's funny. We go to Hawaii every year and there is no difference. I have a friend in St. Lucia and they say all is normal there too.
 
That area flooded 5000 years ago, and has been in the tidal zone ever since. And it's still in the tidal zone. Thus I'm wondering why you thought it was a confirmation of your kooky conspiracy theory that says the whole planet is lying about sea level rise.
And is now being exposed. Logically if sea levels were rising as fast as you claim then this tidal flat should be under at least a foot of water......only it isn't....

And once again the walleyedretard reveals that he has a third grade reading comprehension level.

The article you cited plainly said that these ancient stumps were further exposed by the erosion caused by the record setting rains and flooding England has gone through in the last few years.

When the sea swallowed part of Britain’s western coastline this year and then spat it out again, leaving homes and livelihoods destroyed but also a dense forest of prehistoric tree stumps more exposed than ever, it was as if one had caught a faint glimpse of that Welsh Atlantis.

The submerged forest of Borth is not new. First flooded some 5,000 years ago by rising sea levels after the last ice age, it has been there as long as locals remember, coming and going with the tides and occasionally disappearing under the sand for years on end. But the floods and storms that battered Britain earlier this year radically changed the way archaeologists interpret the landscape: A quarter-mile-long saltwater channel cutting through the trees, revealed by erosion for the first time, provided a trove of clues to where human life may have been concentrated and where its traces may yet be found.
 
Last edited:
That area flooded 5000 years ago, and has been in the tidal zone ever since. And it's still in the tidal zone. Thus I'm wondering why you thought it was a confirmation of your kooky conspiracy theory that says the whole planet is lying about sea level rise.
And is now being exposed. Logically if sea levels were rising as fast as you claim then this tidal flat should be under at least a foot of water......only it isn't....

And once again the walleyedretard reveals that he has a third grade reading comprehension level.

The article you cited plainly said that these ancient stumps were further exposed by the erosion caused by the record setting rains and flooding England has gone through in the last few years.

When the sea swallowed part of Britain’s western coastline this year and then spat it out again, leaving homes and livelihoods destroyed but also a dense forest of prehistoric tree stumps more exposed than ever, it was as if one had caught a faint glimpse of that Welsh Atlantis.

The submerged forest of Borth is not new. First flooded some 5,000 years ago by rising sea levels after the last ice age, it has been there as long as locals remember, coming and going with the tides and occasionally disappearing under the sand for years on end. But the floods and storms that battered Britain earlier this year radically changed the way archaeologists interpret the landscape: A quarter-mile-long saltwater channel cutting through the trees, revealed by erosion for the first time, provided a trove of clues to where human life may have been concentrated and where its traces may yet be found.







Yes, we understand you can't understand basic logic. You didn't address what I said, you merely posted that which I already have. Care to make a statement or are you too stupid to be able to string more than curses together?:eusa_whistle:
 
It was a real eye opener for us to see how much higher the Caribbean Sea was this last visit. The last time we were there was 2010. In just 4 years, we could actually see where the islands were losing land.

If you want to see some of the most beautiful islands in the world, don't wait because, they ARE disappearing.

Hmmmm....The wife and I have been going to Negril for twenty years and the water levels are still the same.
 
You guys are just being silly. Why should 3 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, which is increasing at the fastest level in history, have any impact on climate change? Everyone knows that climate change is just a conspiracy hatched by Gore. Burning more of our finite natural resource is GOOD for you. If you don't believe me, ask anyone at Exxon...
 
You guys are just being silly. Why should 3 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, which is increasing at the fastest level in history, have any impact on climate change? Everyone knows that climate change is just a conspiracy hatched by Gore. Burning more of our finite natural resource is GOOD for you. If you don't believe me, ask anyone at Exxon...







Three trillion tons? Wow. How'd you come up with that number sport? Better sell your Harley. It's a gross polluter so you shouldn't be allowed to have one.
 
You guys are just being silly. Why should 3 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, which is increasing at the fastest level in history, have any impact on climate change? Everyone knows that climate change is just a conspiracy hatched by Gore. Burning more of our finite natural resource is GOOD for you. If you don't believe me, ask anyone at Exxon...
so it should be a piece of cake for you to show us in a lab how an instantaneous 100ppm increase in CO2 will raise temperatures by 2 to 6 degrees

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
 
The Earth is in constant change no matter if it is climate or tectonic shifts. They have found remnants of sea life in the Rocky mountains.

The Earth is always in constant change and no amount of money or the amount of feel good laws will stop it.
 
You guys are just being silly. Why should 3 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, which is increasing at the fastest level in history, have any impact on climate change? Everyone knows that climate change is just a conspiracy hatched by Gore. Burning more of our finite natural resource is GOOD for you. If you don't believe me, ask anyone at Exxon...







Three trillion tons? Wow. How'd you come up with that number sport? Better sell your Harley. It's a gross polluter so you shouldn't be allowed to have one.

3 trillion tons is the total amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. I lost the link, and I know that you can not get your head around that number anyway, so I will simply post the link for the ANNUAL emissions per year, which is 31,000,000 tones, which, by the way, if constant and not absorbed back into the planet at all, would have taken only 10,000 years to accumulate to 31 trillion tons, smartass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions
 
You guys are just being silly. Why should 3 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, which is increasing at the fastest level in history, have any impact on climate change? Everyone knows that climate change is just a conspiracy hatched by Gore. Burning more of our finite natural resource is GOOD for you. If you don't believe me, ask anyone at Exxon...
so it should be a piece of cake for you to show us in a lab how an instantaneous 100ppm increase in CO2 will raise temperatures by 2 to 6 degrees

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Oh, I would not dare dispute you on this. How could 31,000,000 tons of greenhouse emmissions per year possibly have any effect on climate?
 
The Earth is in constant change no matter if it is climate or tectonic shifts. They have found remnants of sea life in the Rocky mountains.

The Earth is always in constant change and no amount of money or the amount of feel good laws will stop it.

That being said, then we should just accept our fate gracefully, knowing that the ultimate outcome of the flooding of the oceans will put billions of people at risk of famine, and death due to changes in the environment that we are orchestrating. What the hell, nobody lives forever anyway.
 

Forum List

Back
Top