Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
You are - apparently - wrong.Major Excuse-Making Attempt No. 3 - ( "Attack the source, regardless of whether the veracity of the report" )It's my opinion, everyone has their own unique outrage button. If you want to act all shocked and offended by this then you go right ahead. As for me there have been plentiful sex scandals over the years that make this look pretty lame as well as lonely and sad.Major Excuse-Making Attempt No. 1.
Major Excuse-Making Attempt No. 2 - ( "It's no big deal" )
Is it?
A fictional ramble about psychology misrepresented and demagogued 43 years later by Glenn Beck is supposed to be a "big deal"?
Ever watched Glenn Beck?
Actually the OP itself puts the lie to her own headlie (spelling intentional) by running the image of the 1972 piece, where anyone and everyone can see it doesn't say what she says it says.
--- A headlie she copied directly, verbatim, from the Glenn Beck site.
So the source had already attacked itself.
The OP and its supporting imagery agree, in both substance and specifics.
The source is immaterial.
Do you dispute the authenticity of the article, as presented in the OP?
If so, then you will have an uphill battle, to effectively argue your case, methinks.
If you cannot dispute the authenticity of the article, then it may prove wisest to toss-in the towell on this one.
Otherwise, you may get caught-out, trying to defend the indefensible.
There are, indeed, times when it is best to walk away.
I respectfully suggest that this may be one of those times.
Last edited: