So Much For 'Every Woman Must Be Believed': Abrams Says '$crew Women' In Sucking Up To Joe For VP Chance

[Canon Shooter]

Now we come to Joe Biden...and a legit case that even potential 2020 VP Kamala Harris said she believes is valid

If she believed the accusations she wouldn't be endorsing Biden, and she wouldn't want to be his running mate...

 

[Rye Catcher]

Stacey Abrams on Tara Reade sexual assault allegation:
'I believe Joe Biden'

During his Presidential Campaign so far Joe demonstrated:

1. He could not remember what political office he is running for:
-- "I'm Joe Biden, and I am running for the US SENATE..."

2. He could not remember what STATE he was in
-- That's still better than Barry, who thought there were 57 states

3. He could not tell the difference between / did not know his SISTER from his own WIFE

....and yet Stacey Abrams claims, 'I BELIEVE JOE BIDEN'.

Bwuhahahahaha

Abrams is so pathetic, so desperate to get the not to be Biden's VP selection that she is demonstrating she is willing to kiss Joe Biden's old, white, wrinkled, pedophile, hair-sniffing, women-groping ass, throwing women under the proverbial bus if that's what it takes.

Alyssa Milano, the liberal Hollywood self-proclaimed Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrat Party's #MeToo / All-Women-Must-Be-Believed Conservative/GOP-Targeting Attack Dog, completely abandoned the Democrats' / Hillary mantra of 'Every Woman Must Be Believed', as well, but at least she made an attempt to make it seem she gives a damn about women who have been sexually assaulted ... by anyone except a Democrat..

For Milano, It's no longer '#MeToo' or 'Every Woman Must Be Believed' - It's 'I See and Hear You'...something Joe Biden himself refuses to acknowledge.

At least Milano and others now are coming out and insisting it must be investigated. They are at least smart enough to know a FAUX investigation must at least be attempted to create the PERCEPTION that their hypocrisy does not exist and Biden is being treated at least 1/10th as badly as Kavanaugh and his family were.

Abrams, however, just publicly declared, 'Screw Reade, Screw Women, no investigation needed, nothing to see here - I BELIEVE JOE....NEXT!'


You would think every woman being considered as Joe's VP would want this settled...for Joe Biden himself to at least acknowledge this accusation, which he refuses to do. so far Abrams is the only one who is publicly come out to say 'I don't care if this old white guy felt up some white intern years ago - I want to be the next VP!'

Stacey Abrams on Tara Reade sexual assault allegation: ‘I believe Joe Biden’

Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams (D) on Tuesday night defended presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden when asked about sexual assault allegations from T…

thehill.com

.

Your racism is showing again.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Liberals are only political beasts. They are hypocrites all day every day.

Well Joe Biden doesn't have a history of assautling females like Tramp does.

Trump has no such history, moron.

He has a history of adulteries and of assaulting women and that doesn't take in effect his NDAs.

You trampers are dumber than a box of rocks.

Who did he assault?

Females.

It is clear that YOU made a false allegation against President Trump, you a sister of Dr. Ford?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I haven't heard anyone mention one stark difference between the Biden and Kavanaugh accusations.

Kavanaugh's accuser was a virulent Trump hater who scrubbed all of her social media (to conceal her obvious bias) before going public with her accusation. Biden's accuser was a loyal democrat since way before the incident in question until the present day.

Doesn't that count for something?

Not if she has an allegiance to another high profile Democrat who wants the nomination...

WTF are you babbling about? Does she possess time travel technology to get her Mom to call in to Larry King in 1993?

 

[iceberg]

I haven't heard anyone mention one stark difference between the Biden and Kavanaugh accusations.

Kavanaugh's accuser was a virulent Trump hater who scrubbed all of her social media (to conceal her obvious bias) before going public with her accusation. Biden's accuser was a loyal democrat since way before the incident in question until the present day.

Doesn't that count for something?

after 20 years? no.

 

[iceberg]

Any Democrat who believed Trump's accusers and Kavanaugh's accuser, without the benefit of actual evidence, now finds themselves in a ridiculously difficult position. They can try to obfuscate all they want but, at the end of the day, every single one of them will have to explain why they believe Tara Reade isn't credible but believed Blasey-Ford was...

It's far worse for the democrats. With Biden, you now have credible evidence as to Biden's guilt as where Ford had none.

What credible evidence is that? We certainly haven't seen any.

I actually don't believe there's any credible evidence.

But that doesn't mean that those who supported Blasey-Ford don't find themselves in an almost untenable position...

Maybe you're watching the wrong news channels. Unlike Ford, she actually filed a police report. Unlike Ford, several people came forward to claim she told them at the time of the attack. Unlike Ford, Reade's mother called into the Larry King show asking him about what can be done about a "very well known Senator" that attacked her daughter while working for him. We have that video.

fair enough - i'll dig through the day but man, working from home simply means many more meetings.

so - what happened then that prevented it from being followed through and how did it end back then?

 

[easyt65]

He has a history of adulteries and of assaulting women and that doesn't take in effect his NDAs.
You trampers are dumber than a box of rocks.

1. Please provide a link to the evidence that CIVILIAN (or PRESIDENT) Trump sexually assaulted a woman.

2. In defense of Bill Clinton and his infamous adultery IN THE WH as PRESIDENT, snowflakes argued that 'WHATEVER HAPPENS IN A PRESIDENT'S PERSONAL SEXUAL LIFE IS NO ONE'S BUSINESS'. It is just AMAZING how they go to such extremes to prove they believe that only applies to DEMOCRATS.
** Sidenote: Trump was a CITIZEN, no shoving cigars upo inside Interns in the WH....

3. Why do snowflakes have such a problem with 2 consenting adults entering into agreements?

4. This thread is about Joe Biden and the sexual assault allegation he refuses to acknowledge, Kamala Harris believes, and the media is trying hard to downplay....and snowflakes like you are 100% committing to ''But...but...but WHAT ABOUT...." in an attempt to DISTRACT', not DEFEND.

 

[easyt65]

Those on the right vehemently defended Kavanaugh against what was widely considered to be a political hit job. Those same conservatives are now feigning shock at the fact that the left is defending Biden...

No one is DEFENDING Biden.

BIDEN refuses to acknowledge it.
The media is attempting to PROTECT / SHIELD him from it.
Harris said she BELIEVES READE.
Abrams said 'I don't give a damn, I want to be VP'
Snowflakes are saying, "B...b...but WHAT ABOUT TRUMP'....

 

[easyt65]

If she believed the accusations she wouldn't be endorsing Biden, and she wouldn't want to be his running mate...

Bullshit - Harris f*ed her way to where she got politically, and - like Abrams - she doesn't give a damn as long as she can become VP...

 

[easyt65]

Your racism is showing again.

DEMOCRAT 101:

WHEN SOMEONE POINTS OUT AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH, JUST CALL THEM A 'RACIST'.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Any Democrat who believed Trump's accusers and Kavanaugh's accuser, without the benefit of actual evidence, now finds themselves in a ridiculously difficult position. They can try to obfuscate all they want but, at the end of the day, every single one of them will have to explain why they believe Tara Reade isn't credible but believed Blasey-Ford was...

It's far worse for the democrats. With Biden, you now have credible evidence as to Biden's guilt as where Ford had none.

What credible evidence is that? We certainly haven't seen any.

I actually don't believe there's any credible evidence.

But that doesn't mean that those who supported Blasey-Ford don't find themselves in an almost untenable position...

Maybe you're watching the wrong news channels. Unlike Ford, she actually filed a police report. Unlike Ford, several people came forward to claim she told them at the time of the attack. Unlike Ford, Reade's mother called into the Larry King show asking him about what can be done about a "very well known Senator" that attacked her daughter while working for him. We have that video.

fair enough - i'll dig through the day but man, working from home simply means many more meetings.

so - what happened then that prevented it from being followed through and how did it end back then?

That I'm not sure of. All the stories I dig up seem to say the same thing, and that is about the current events.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Tara Reade has not testified under oath to this episode in front of millions of viewers as did Dr. Ford, nor has she been subjected to the type of cross examination that the Republican Senators put her under in the Kavanaugh hearing; Kavanaugh supporters lambasted Dr. Ford, Biden's supporters simply denied the allegation without attacking the alleged victim.

That's the point. Why is she not testifying in front of millions of viewers? Why are the Democrats not insisting on an FBI investigation like they did Ford? Why are they not insisting on a Senate hearing of the matter? Why are they barely covering the story on the MSM?

 

[bripat9643]

Any Democrat who believed Trump's accusers and Kavanaugh's accuser, without the benefit of actual evidence, now finds themselves in a ridiculously difficult position. They can try to obfuscate all they want but, at the end of the day, every single one of them will have to explain why they believe Tara Reade isn't credible but believed Blasey-Ford was...

It's far worse for the democrats. With Biden, you now have credible evidence as to Biden's guilt as where Ford had none.

What credible evidence is that? We certainly haven't seen any.

I actually don't believe there's any credible evidence.

But that doesn't mean that those who supported Blasey-Ford don't find themselves in an almost untenable position...

You supported Blasey-Ford.

Who do you think you're kidding?

 

[bripat9643]

No, you're going to stop talking/responding to me because I'm done with you, and I have no further use for you.

Of course you have no more use for me because I pointed out the fact that you are uninformed, you have no desire to educate yourself, and when someone does back up their comments by spoon-feeding you information that hurts yoiur argument (or attempt to deny reality) you get pissed.

Your refusal to engage in informed conversation / discussion when you have proven you are ill-prepared to do so is no loss.

This is less about who is to be believed or not. It's more an issue of the blatant hypocrisy on the left. They all said they supported Blazy with not one ounce of supporting evidence, and now are giving their nod to Biden when this has been in the media for couple of weeks now.

Oh, there's no question about the hypocrisy from the left.

But that hypocrisy lives on the right, as well...

Wrong, turd, there is no hypocrisy on the right. They are only holding the left to its own standards.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Any Democrat who believed Trump's accusers and Kavanaugh's accuser, without the benefit of actual evidence, now finds themselves in a ridiculously difficult position. They can try to obfuscate all they want but, at the end of the day, every single one of them will have to explain why they believe Tara Reade isn't credible but believed Blasey-Ford was...

It's far worse for the democrats. With Biden, you now have credible evidence as to Biden's guilt as where Ford had none.

What credible evidence is that? We certainly haven't seen any.

I actually don't believe there's any credible evidence.

But that doesn't mean that those who supported Blasey-Ford don't find themselves in an almost untenable position...

You supported Blasey-Ford.

Who do you think you're kidding?

Is that how you debate? Someone says something that doesn't fit your narrative?

Fuck you, you little douchebag. I didn't support Ford an iota, just as I'm not supporting Reade an iota. I need to have more of a reason than party affiliation to believe or distrust someone...

 

[Canon Shooter]

If she believed the accusations she wouldn't be endorsing Biden, and she wouldn't want to be his running mate...

Bullshit - Harris f*ed her way to where she got politically, and - like Abrams - she doesn't give a damn as long as she can become VP...

I disagree, conditionally.

Biden has to confront these accusations head on. If he doesn't, then everything he said about Blasey-Ford and Kavanaugh becomes suspect. Furthermore, anyone who associates themselves with him, say a candidate for VP, would be committing career suicide if they do so without Biden addressing them.

Harris doesn't want to be Vice President. She wants the White House...

 

[Canon Shooter]

Any Democrat who believed Trump's accusers and Kavanaugh's accuser, without the benefit of actual evidence, now finds themselves in a ridiculously difficult position. They can try to obfuscate all they want but, at the end of the day, every single one of them will have to explain why they believe Tara Reade isn't credible but believed Blasey-Ford was...

It's far worse for the democrats. With Biden, you now have credible evidence as to Biden's guilt as where Ford had none.

What credible evidence is that? We certainly haven't seen any.

I actually don't believe there's any credible evidence.

But that doesn't mean that those who supported Blasey-Ford don't find themselves in an almost untenable position...

Maybe you're watching the wrong news channels. Unlike Ford, she actually filed a police report. Unlike Ford, several people came forward to claim she told them at the time of the attack. Unlike Ford, Reade's mother called into the Larry King show asking him about what can be done about a "very well known Senator" that attacked her daughter while working for him. We have that video.

fair enough - i'll dig through the day but man, working from home simply means many more meetings.

so - what happened then that prevented it from being followed through and how did it end back then?

If a police report was filed when it happened, it should've been investigated. Unfortunately, she only filed that report about two weeks ago.

Legally, it's absolutely meaningless...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If she believed the accusations she wouldn't be endorsing Biden, and she wouldn't want to be his running mate...

Bullshit - Harris f*ed her way to where she got politically, and - like Abrams - she doesn't give a damn as long as she can become VP...

I disagree, conditionally.

Biden has to confront these accusations head on. If he doesn't, then everything he said about Blasey-Ford and Kavanaugh becomes suspect. Furthermore, anyone who associates themselves with him, say a candidate for VP, would be committing career suicide if they do so without Biden addressing them.

Harris doesn't want to be Vice President. She wants the White House...

I think you're wrong about that. It all depends on the media coverage this gets. From what I've seen, it's been very scant outside of Fox News. I'd be willing to bet that if somebody went out into the streets, and asked people if they knew about this accusation, most people would say no they didn't.

The mainstream media is nothing more than an extension of the Democrat party.

 

[Canon Shooter]

If she believed the accusations she wouldn't be endorsing Biden, and she wouldn't want to be his running mate...

Bullshit - Harris f*ed her way to where she got politically, and - like Abrams - she doesn't give a damn as long as she can become VP...

I disagree, conditionally.

Biden has to confront these accusations head on. If he doesn't, then everything he said about Blasey-Ford and Kavanaugh becomes suspect. Furthermore, anyone who associates themselves with him, say a candidate for VP, would be committing career suicide if they do so without Biden addressing them.

Harris doesn't want to be Vice President. She wants the White House...

I think you're wrong about that. It all depends on the media coverage this gets. From what I've seen, it's been very scant outside of Fox News. I'd be willing to bet that if somebody went out into the streets, and asked people if they knew about this accusation, most people would say no they didn't.

The mainstream media is nothing more than an extension of the Democrat party.

Well, I think you're wrong about that. It's all over CNN:

Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - CNN

Biden needs to get in front of this and, if he doesn't, Republicans will use it as a jackhammer to put the nails in his coffin. I'd even be willing to lay a bet that you see Reade speak at the convention in August...

 

[ColonelAngus]

Do you even know how to work 'Google'?
Do you even try to keep up with the news?

Spoon-feeding reality-avoiding/denying snowflakes gets so tiresome.....


In addition to Reade's family / mother, one woman who supports Reade's claim and has come forward with information is Lynda LaCasse. Then you have just about anyone who has seen the Larry King tape footage...and there's more...much more than Dems had with which to accuse kavanaugh.

First of all, fuck off. If you make an argument, be prepared to back it up. Don't expect me to research out and prove or disprove what you say. That would be monumentally stupid of you.

Second, who has identified the Larry King caller as Reade's mother? Reade? If the show's producers and/or call screener identify her, that'd be one thing. Has that happened? I honestly don't know.

According to you, though, "just about anyone" who heard the tape should be able to do it. That's stupid. I've heard it, and nothing in that call suggests that Reade is the woman being discussed, and I sure as Hell can't identify the voice of Tara Reade's mother.

Can you?

Read(e) did identify that voice as her own mothers. Or do you really believe some woman called in, who's daughter was also attacked by a "prominent Senator" during that same period?

I know Reade identified the caller as her mother.

Unfortunately, she didn't identify her as the caller until all of this bullshit. Think about how differently politics in this country would've gone if Biden was held accountable when, you know, it actually happened.

Here's my problem with it: Reade is making this a really big deal and, if it's true. It is a big deal. But here's the thing, if it's true, it's been a big deal for the last 27 years, and it's just too coincidental that she brings it up now, just as it was too coincidental for Blasey-Ford to make her accusations when she did...

Reade is more credible than Ford, however, neither of them should have affected their accused of being in office.

Kavanaugh should be on SCOTUS and Joe should run for President.