Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 14,519
- 6,180
- 208
At least $8M less than Trump^^^ total gaslighting
How much money do you think the biden's got from the ccp?
At least 30 fewer patents
But who's counting?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At least $8M less than Trump^^^ total gaslighting
How much money do you think the biden's got from the ccp?
Hunter's sugar daddy appears to be protected by the Deep State.
The CIA blocked federal investigators from interviewing Hunter Biden’s “sugar brother” Kevin Morris during a five-year probe into the first son’s alleged tax crimes, a whistleblower has told House impeachment leaders.
House Oversight and Judiciary Committee chairmen say the whistleblower informed them the intelligence agency stopped IRS and Justice Department investigators from interviewing Morris in August 2021, a Hollywood lawyer and patron of the first son, according to a Thursday letter addressed to CIA Director William Burns.
The whistleblower informed Oversight chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that two DOJ officials were summoned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Va. — and told Morris “could not be a witness” for their investigation into Hunter Biden.
CIA blocked feds from interviewing Hunter Bidenâs âsugar brotherâ Kevin Morris during five-year tax probe
The CIA blocked federal investigators from interviewing Hunter Biden’s “sugar brother” Kevin Morris during a five-year probe into the first son’s alleged tax crimes, a whistleblower has told House …nypost.com
And it gets even better:
Whistleblower Reveals CIA Stonewalled Interview with Hunter Biden Business Associate
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY)judiciary.house.gov
No. Not at all what I mean. Not even close.You mean like "Christian white nationalists"?
Chasing the Hunter story is irrelevant. The Committee failed to find a connection to any dirt, not dug in Moscow and no financial link to Joe. It is over. Joe will not be impeached. Might as well dump the Hunter BS, (though he is a shit in his own right) and fight it out on the election.
At least $8M less than Trump
At least 30 fewer patents
But who's counting?
Why did the gov't come out with a fluff video on it recently trying to justify it's existence?It is important to the cult to have an imaginary boogeyman like "the deep state" to blame for the fact that their day is done and they won't be winning elections anymore.
Guess it was cool on your block when they were investigating Kushner.House Oversight committee?????
You are, of course, deluded.Here is evidence of a deep state and you need to realize that the media is part of the deep state too. In 2008 Trump said Pelosi should have impeached Bush for lying us into Iraq. If you're being honest, you know he did. Stop with all the comebacks and excuses like Hillary signed on too. Fuck that. We all know Bush lied us into Iraq.
But not one liberal media station ever reported that. Trump himself said it in 2008 and then repeated it in 2016 when he ran for the GOP nomination. And he won. So Republicans deep down must on some level know Bush lied us into Iraq.
But the liberal media never said this. So how liberal is the media? It's not. Only on social wedge issues. Fiscally, they are corporations run by Rich fiscal conservatives.
Anyways, so yes there is a deep state. All the Republicans who wouldn't dare admit Bush lied us into Iraq belong. MSNBC who won't report it belongs.
Only Trump admits Bush lied us into Iraq. He is not part of the deep state, globalist, RINOS and DINO's.
Please explain where in the Constitution...Joe could be impeached for failing to uphold The Constitution, but I agree, don't pull the impeachment stuff right now.
After the election, maybe.
Why did the gov't come out with a fluff video on it recently trying to justify it's existence?
Bush invaded a country using false intel... They told lie after lie to have a multi Trillion dollar war...You are, of course, deluded.
The "liberal" media as far back as 2003 was calling for Bush' impeachment.
Do an actual web search and you'll get some 6M entries.
View attachment 923619
You release the 'hard proof' at the investigations end.Your sources say "Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) revealed", can we just call bullsjhit now... To say the least, they are not reliable, they need to show hard proof... Then if true, CIA needs to explain why?
Jared?Why did the gov't come out with a fluff video on it recently trying to justify it's existence?
Guess it was cool on your block when they were investigating Kushner.
Are you agreeing with me? Seems to me the liberals didn't impeach Bush. MSNBC didn't talk about it. If they did, how many news cycles? It's not enough to report on it one day. When they want to get something in our skulls they report on it over and overYou are, of course, deluded.
The "liberal" media as far back as 2003 was calling for Bush' impeachment.
Do an actual web search and you'll get some 6M entries.
View attachment 923619
You are, of course, deluded.
The "liberal" media as far back as 2003 was calling for Bush' impeachment.
Do an actual web search and you'll get some 6M entries.
View attachment 923619
But they did.Bush invaded a country using false intel... They told lie after lie to have a multi Trillion dollar war...
Yes, some people were asking was this impeachable...
But they didn't... Mainly because it couldn't be proven that Bush knew what he was saying was false.
Aren't you the guy who recently said, in this very thread, that you read and follow many many news sources across all divides, and basically, nothing gets by you.
"Liberal" and I suppose you mean by that Democrats did not control the House till January 2007.Are you agreeing with me? Seems to me the liberals didn't impeach Bush. MSNBC didn't talk about it. If they did, how many news cycles? It's not enough to report on it one day. When they want to get something in our skulls they report on it over and over
Trump said it in 2008 and repeated it in 2016 while running for the GOP nominee and Republicans voted for him
“When she first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I’m very impressed by her. I think she’s a very impressive person. I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn’t do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush. It was almost – it just seemed like she was going to really look to impeach Bush and get him out of office, which personally I think would’ve been a wonderful thing,” Trump told Blitzer in the interview.