So this SCOTUS is supposedly corrupt and needs to be changed, but agree 9-0 to DEFEND sales of ABORTION DRUG

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
53,358
53,999
3,615

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Abortion Drug Mifepristone​



I thought this SCOTUS hated women and women’s health….YET THIS VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS TO NOT BLOCK THE SALE OF THE ABORTION PILL.

Lefties, You cannot explain this because you lie about SCOTUS being corrupt.
 
Typical liberals. They bitch and moan about SCOTUS if a ruling goes against their beliefs but are dead silent when one goes in their favor.

Liberals suck.
 

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Abortion Drug Mifepristone​



I thought this SCOTUS hated women and women’s health….YET THIS VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS TO NOT BLOCK THE SALE OF THE ABORTION PILL.

Lefties, You cannot explain this because you lie about SCOTUS being corrupt.

The ruling on standing wasn't just for this case. But all cases. Judge Matt in Texas fucked up that badly.
 
Like the children they are, lib loons rant when they don’t get what they want and flip flop when they do
It’s why they remain So mentally and emotionally undeveloped
 
Like the children they are, lib loons rant when they don’t get what they want and flip flop when they do
It’s why they remain So mentally and emotionally undeveloped

Or....Judge Matt from Texas was so comically and ineptly incompetent that he granted standing to folks who had no skin the game. They'd never taken the drug, they'd never been harmed by the drug, they'd never prescribed the drug, they'd never been required to prescribe the drug.

They claimed standing so that they could restrict OTHER people's access to the drug. That's not how standing works.

That's why it was 9-0 bitchslap of Judge Matt.....because he made a blunder that any 1st year law students would have known to avoid.
 
Or....Judge Matt from Texas was so comically and ineptly incompetent that he granted standing to folks who had no skin the game. They'd never taken the drug, they'd never been harmed by the drug, they'd never prescribed the drug, they'd never been required to prescribe the drug.

They claimed standing so that they could restrict OTHER people's access to the drug. That's not how standing works.

That's why it was 9-0 bitchslap of Judge Matt.....because he made a blunder that any 1st year law students would have known to avoid.
No “Or” available
 
No “Or” available

Says you. The Supreme Court unanimously said otherwise.

1718402868459.png
 

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Abortion Drug Mifepristone​



I thought this SCOTUS hated women and women’s health….YET THIS VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS TO NOT BLOCK THE SALE OF THE ABORTION PILL.

Lefties, You cannot explain this because you lie about SCOTUS being corrupt.
There's an election in less than five months, they're not idiots.
 
It looks like 2 of the 3 liberal justices are spending more time raking in millions on book deals vs doing the job. Also not recusing themselves when cases come before the court involving the companies paying them. :eusa_think:
 
It looks like 2 of the 3 liberal justices are spending more time raking in millions on book deals vs doing the job. Also not recusing themselves when cases come before the court involving the companies paying them. :eusa_think:

So they are missing cases because they're promoting books instead?

If so, which case did 2 of the 3 liberal judges miss promoting their books?
 

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Abortion Drug Mifepristone​



I thought this SCOTUS hated women and women’s health….YET THIS VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS TO NOT BLOCK THE SALE OF THE ABORTION PILL.

Lefties, You cannot explain this because you lie about SCOTUS being corrupt.
Exept they did no such thing.

They just said the group suing didn't have standing.
 
Nope, the justices that Trump appointed are all CORRUPT AND THE COURT MUST BE STACKED.

You liberals are just always so full of shit.

THE CONSERVATIVE JUDGES WOULD HAVE RULED AGAINST THIS IF THEY HATE WOMEN AND WANT TO DENY THEM HEALTHCARE.

When will you get tired of being wrong?

Lefties, you simply cannot reconcile your BULLSHIT with this ruling.
 
No they are using taxpayer funded staffers to handle the book sales, oh wait that's ILLEGAL!

So they're doing their jobs then? They're not missing any cases?

And the two biggest book sellers in the Supreme Court are Kavanaugh and and Jackson.
 

Forum List

Back
Top