🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

so whats the solution?

kim-jong-un_650_050914125448_101414084524.jpg


=

article-0-1D189DBC00000578-981_634x446.jpg
 
You don't want war with n Korea. Neither do I.

So how do we solve the n Korea problem?

I'm all ears

How about " Not feeding a bloated Military Industrial Complex by pretending an impoverished country is a real threat."

There's a solution.

so North Korea can make a couple of missiles with low-yeild warheads that might be able to hit a target, even though half their controlled missile tests are failures.

I guess that is a good thing for the Orange Shitgibbon, it allows him to look "presidential". But we can't attack N. Korea without getting hundreds of thousands of people killed, and the country is practically immune to economic sanctions because the world has been economically punishing it for the last 70 years.
 
How about " Not feeding a bloated Military Industrial Complex by pretending an impoverished country is a real threat."

There's a solution.

so North Korea can make a couple of missiles with low-yeild warheads that might be able to hit a target, even though half their controlled missile tests are failures.

I guess that is a good thing for the Orange Shitgibbon, it allows him to look "presidential". But we can't attack N. Korea without getting hundreds of thousands of people killed, and the country is practically immune to economic sanctions because the world has been economically punishing it for the last 70 years.

So, your “solution” is to let them lob a few nukes at us, according to their limited ability to produce them, to pretend that the thousands of American lives and the destruction lost in these attacks is no big deal, and to do little or nothing to prevent or respond to these attacks?

LIbEralism truly is a mental disease. Thank you for once again proving this point.
 
So, your “solution” is to let them lob a few nukes at us, according to their limited ability to produce them, to pretend that the thousands of American lives and the destruction lost in these attacks is no big deal, and to do little or nothing to prevent or respond to these attacks?

LIbEralism truly is a mental disease. Thank you for once again proving this point.

First, it's debatable if they have nukes they can actually lob at us.

Second, if they did, they'd be wiped off the map.

Third, the history of North Korea is they act beligerent, get a little of the world's attention, and then make concessions to get more aide.

The real threat of North Korea is that it will economically collapse and millions of people will be wandering around looking for food.

If Japan and South Korea, both very rich countries that are within range of their weapons aren't treating this like a big deal, why should we, exactly?
 
Make no mistake, there are lots of republicans who want to have a war on Korea, too many for comfort. They are not looking for alternative solutions nor are they thinking about the aftermath. I feel it is almost inevitable now. Who knows? It might finally be the thing that distracts attention from the Russia investigation.
 
Second, if they did, they'd be wiped off the map.


Yeah... because the progressive leftards are suddenly gonna grow a fucking spine and have the stomach for that.... right!

I call bullshit on this.

The radioactive dust wouldn't settle from the mushroom cloud before you chicken shits would be finding ways to capitulate and call for "civility" and "understanding" with NK. You're not fooling anybody.
 
Yeah... because the progressive leftards are suddenly gonna grow a fucking spine and have the stomach for that.... right!

I call bullshit on this.

The radioactive dust wouldn't settle from the mushroom cloud before you chicken shits would be finding ways to capitulate and call for "civility" and "understanding" with NK. You're not fooling anybody.

What are you basing that on?

Shit the last time something like this happened, which would be 9/11, liberals not only went along with an attack on Afghanistan, they went along with an attack on Iraq, which had NOT A FUCKING THING TO DO with 9/11.

The thing about our foreign policy is that it really doesn't change all that much depending on who is in power. Obama and Clinton did all the same stupid things Bush and Reagan did.

Of course, even a small nuclear war between the US and North Korea would probably trigger a nuclear winter that would kill hundreds of millions around the world when the food supply dries up.

Not that you morons ever think about that.
 
Make no mistake, there are lots of republicans who want to have a war on Korea, too many for comfort. They are not looking for alternative solutions nor are they thinking about the aftermath. I feel it is almost inevitable now. Who knows? It might finally be the thing that distracts attention from the Russia investigation.

So how many alternative solutions did DumBama give to NK? What about Bill Clinton? How about George Bush?

There are no alternatives with this little meatball. The less we push back, the harder he pushes.

Nobody wants a war, but sometimes it's the only reasonable solution. I can't see sending troops into NK, but I can see bombing the shit out of his nukes, his military, and even land one on his crooked head. Plus we need to shoot down any missiles that leave the grounds of NK.
 
I need only one question answered..............Is the little Fat Man mentally unstable to the point that he would actually launch a Nuclear Missile..........

Is the little Fat Man really that demented......................if he is.......then the only option is to either kill him...........or take out his nuclear capabilities in one quick massive strike.

No military solution can be done without first talking to S. Korea and Japan............this is THEIR BACK YARD.........and S. Korea and/or Japan could pay a very high price for these actions.
 
Nobody wants a war, but sometimes it's the only reasonable solution. I can't see sending troops into NK, but I can see bombing the shit out of his nukes, his military, and even land one on his crooked head. Plus we need to shoot down any missiles that leave the grounds of NK.

Okay, besides the fact that anti-Ballistic technology is an expensive fraud, how is dropping bombs on a paranoid regime going to make them less paranoid, exactly?
 
Well there's no way NK will give up nukes altogether. I can't blame them considering the last 100 years . It's like asking Israel to give up theirs .

I don't think Kim is nuts, at least on the dictator scale . China is pissed at them now , sanctions can really hurt if we get them on board. Float NK little food , they should be good .

Dictators all want to be accepted by the other countries.
 
Well there's no way NK will give up nukes altogether. I can't blame them considering the last 100 years . It's like asking Israel to give up theirs .

I don't think Kim is nuts, at least on the dictator scale . China is pissed at them now , sanctions can really hurt if we get them on board. Float NK little food , they should be good .

Dictators all want to be accepted by the other countries.

Sanctions only hurt the citizens of the country-not the leaders.

NK nuclear and missile technology is in the primary state right now. We need to stop that advancement ASAP so they never become an equal threat to the US and our allies. China is not all that pissed, otherwise they would be the solution to our problem.
 
Nobody wants a war, but sometimes it's the only reasonable solution. I can't see sending troops into NK, but I can see bombing the shit out of his nukes, his military, and even land one on his crooked head. Plus we need to shoot down any missiles that leave the grounds of NK.

Okay, besides the fact that anti-Ballistic technology is an expensive fraud, how is dropping bombs on a paranoid regime going to make them less paranoid, exactly?

It's to about making them less paranoid. It's about stopping their advancements.

What do they have to be paranoid about? Nobody is threatening their country outside of their creation of nukes and delivery systems. If they stopped that, there would be no threat to that little country certainly no reason to be paranoid. Nobody would care about them and leave them entirely alone.
 
I need only one question answered..............Is the little Fat Man mentally unstable to the point that he would actually launch a Nuclear Missile..........

Is the little Fat Man really that demented......................if he is.......then the only option is to either kill him...........or take out his nuclear capabilities in one quick massive strike.

No military solution can be done without first talking to S. Korea and Japan............this is THEIR BACK YARD.........and S. Korea and/or Japan could pay a very high price for these actions.

George H Bush created a law that we cannot target leaders of countries. I think the very first step for Trump to show he means business is to rescind that law.

Nobody knows this guy good enough to say what he is or is not capable of doing. That's the problem. We actually evaluated the mentality of Osama Bin Laden at one time, and look what happened.

You just don't know what a nut is going to do next in their struggle for power.
 
It's to about making them less paranoid. It's about stopping their advancements.

What do they have to be paranoid about? Nobody is threatening their country outside of their creation of nukes and delivery systems. If they stopped that, there would be no threat to that little country certainly no reason to be paranoid. Nobody would care about them and leave them entirely alone.

Dude, we've been waging economic warfare on them for 60 years, they probably have every reason to be paranoid.

We were doing that long before they had nuclear capability.

again, i'm not willing to throw away thousands of lives so the Orange Shitgibbon can look tough.
 
George H Bush created a law that we cannot target leaders of countries. I think the very first step for Trump to show he means business is to rescind that law.

Actually, that law long proceeds Bush. It was called the Church Amendment, and it was put into place in the 1970's when we toppled the democratically elected president of Chile because he was too socialist for our tastes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top