So which is it, Donnie? Legal or not legal to appt. Special Counsel???

[Meister]

Names, places and dates are meaningless without corroboration of which there is none.

uh.... ya, there is.

CBS/AP January 9, 2018, 2:14 PM
Top Dem releases testimony from Steele employer

WASHINGTON — The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee has released a transcript from an interview with the co-founder of Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned a dossier of allegations about President Donald Trump's ties to Russia.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein released the transcript from an August closed-door committee interview with Glenn Simpson after the Republican chairman of the committee, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, declined to. Simpson's firm commissioned the dossier, which was initially paid for by a conservative website and later by Democrats.

The dossier was written by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele.

Trump has derided the dossier as politically motivated, and several GOP-led committees are investigating whether it formed the basis for the FBI's initial investigation into Russian election interference.

Democrats says those investigations are a distraction.

Here are the highlights:

• Simpson testified that the author of the Trump dossier, Christopher Steele, first reached out to the FBI in early July 2016 because Steele thought there was "a security issue about whether a presidential candidate was being blackmailed."
• Steele ended up meeting with an FBI legal attache in Rome in September 2016. The FBI appeared to view Steele's information as credible because a "walk-in" whistleblower from the Trump Organization or Trump Campaign had already come to them with similar concerns. Simpson: "They believed Chris's information might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human source from inside the Trump organization."
  
• Simpson says Steele broke off contact with the FBI just before Election Day because he felt that the agency was not taking his information seriously enough and elevating it to the proper levels. "…there was a concern that the FBI was being manipulated for political ends by the Trump people and that we didn't really understand what was going on. So he stopped dealing with them."
  
• Simpson says that Russian organized crime was a big focus of interest from the beginning, but that Fusion GPS didn't collaborate with Steele on what went into the dossier and what didn't. They left that up to him. Simpson believed Steele's information was credible because 1) Simpson had interacted with Steele for 8 or 9 years when Simpson was a WSJ investigative reporter, and Steele had a "Sterling reputation as a person who doesn't exaggerate." 2) Simpson himself had extensively covered Russian organized crime at WSJ and the info Steele gathered tracked with "my own familiarity with foreign meddling in American elections".
  
• Simpson insists the dossier is highly credible. "It's political rhetoric to call the dossier phoney [sic]. The memos are field reports of real interviews that Chris's network conducted and there's nothing phoney [sic] about it. We can argue about what's prudent and what's not, but it's not a fabrication." Simpson says Steele understood the risk of Russian disinformation while he was conducting interviews: "you know, he was the lead Russianist for MI6."
  
• Simpson says he hired Steele to look into rumors about the Trump campaign's Russia ties in late spring/early summer 2016. He says he gave Steele an open-ended assignment, and didn't direct Steele to find specific facts.

CBS News' Nancy Cordes contributed to this report.

Top Dem releases testimony from Steele employer

And - BTW - you forgot to include the little factoid that BEFORE hillary hired fusion GPS.... it was a republican presidential candidate that hired them first to get info on captain crazy pants. AFTER they dropped them, then hillary's team took them on.

Glenn Simpson! Really? Ha Ha

"Simpson helped write the Trump-Russia dossier, the one compiled by a former British intelligence officer that includes unproven, salacious allegations about President Donald Trump and Russian prostitutes. The dossier's claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia helped spark the FBI investigation now supervised by Special Counsel Robert Mueller."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

Simpson saying the dossier is funny......He helped write it!!!

What's really funny though...

"Simpson has worked for several years on a cause dear to the heart of Vladimir Putin — investigating the case of Sergei Magnitsky, a tax accountant whose death in prison helped prompt Congress to pass a set of sanctions in his name."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

oh my. so how does that negate the fact that a human contact corroborated what was in the dossier? oh & there is that little factoid that simpson was under oath when he went b4 congress.

ticky tocky.

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

In the eyes of the law it does equate to "it didn't happen".

 

[Leo123]

Glenn Simpson! Really? Ha Ha

"Simpson helped write the Trump-Russia dossier, the one compiled by a former British intelligence officer that includes unproven, salacious allegations about President Donald Trump and Russian prostitutes. The dossier's claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia helped spark the FBI investigation now supervised by Special Counsel Robert Mueller."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

Simpson saying the dossier is funny......He helped write it!!!

What's really funny though...

"Simpson has worked for several years on a cause dear to the heart of Vladimir Putin — investigating the case of Sergei Magnitsky, a tax accountant whose death in prison helped prompt Congress to pass a set of sanctions in his name."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

oh my. so how does that negate the fact that a human contact corroborated what was in the dossier? oh & there is that little factoid that simpson was under oath when he went b4 congress.

ticky tocky.

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

The only thing that 'happened' was a dossier based on nothing but hearsay and rumor was falsely presented as a viable document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American Presidential candidate.

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

 

[playtime]

uh.... ya, there is.

CBS/AP January 9, 2018, 2:14 PM
Top Dem releases testimony from Steele employer

WASHINGTON — The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee has released a transcript from an interview with the co-founder of Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned a dossier of allegations about President Donald Trump's ties to Russia.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein released the transcript from an August closed-door committee interview with Glenn Simpson after the Republican chairman of the committee, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, declined to. Simpson's firm commissioned the dossier, which was initially paid for by a conservative website and later by Democrats.

The dossier was written by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele.

Trump has derided the dossier as politically motivated, and several GOP-led committees are investigating whether it formed the basis for the FBI's initial investigation into Russian election interference.

Democrats says those investigations are a distraction.

Here are the highlights:

• Simpson testified that the author of the Trump dossier, Christopher Steele, first reached out to the FBI in early July 2016 because Steele thought there was "a security issue about whether a presidential candidate was being blackmailed."
• Steele ended up meeting with an FBI legal attache in Rome in September 2016. The FBI appeared to view Steele's information as credible because a "walk-in" whistleblower from the Trump Organization or Trump Campaign had already come to them with similar concerns. Simpson: "They believed Chris's information might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human source from inside the Trump organization."
  
• Simpson says Steele broke off contact with the FBI just before Election Day because he felt that the agency was not taking his information seriously enough and elevating it to the proper levels. "…there was a concern that the FBI was being manipulated for political ends by the Trump people and that we didn't really understand what was going on. So he stopped dealing with them."
  
• Simpson says that Russian organized crime was a big focus of interest from the beginning, but that Fusion GPS didn't collaborate with Steele on what went into the dossier and what didn't. They left that up to him. Simpson believed Steele's information was credible because 1) Simpson had interacted with Steele for 8 or 9 years when Simpson was a WSJ investigative reporter, and Steele had a "Sterling reputation as a person who doesn't exaggerate." 2) Simpson himself had extensively covered Russian organized crime at WSJ and the info Steele gathered tracked with "my own familiarity with foreign meddling in American elections".
  
• Simpson insists the dossier is highly credible. "It's political rhetoric to call the dossier phoney [sic]. The memos are field reports of real interviews that Chris's network conducted and there's nothing phoney [sic] about it. We can argue about what's prudent and what's not, but it's not a fabrication." Simpson says Steele understood the risk of Russian disinformation while he was conducting interviews: "you know, he was the lead Russianist for MI6."
  
• Simpson says he hired Steele to look into rumors about the Trump campaign's Russia ties in late spring/early summer 2016. He says he gave Steele an open-ended assignment, and didn't direct Steele to find specific facts.

CBS News' Nancy Cordes contributed to this report.

Top Dem releases testimony from Steele employer

And - BTW - you forgot to include the little factoid that BEFORE hillary hired fusion GPS.... it was a republican presidential candidate that hired them first to get info on captain crazy pants. AFTER they dropped them, then hillary's team took them on.

Glenn Simpson! Really? Ha Ha

"Simpson helped write the Trump-Russia dossier, the one compiled by a former British intelligence officer that includes unproven, salacious allegations about President Donald Trump and Russian prostitutes. The dossier's claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia helped spark the FBI investigation now supervised by Special Counsel Robert Mueller."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

Simpson saying the dossier is funny......He helped write it!!!

What's really funny though...

"Simpson has worked for several years on a cause dear to the heart of Vladimir Putin — investigating the case of Sergei Magnitsky, a tax accountant whose death in prison helped prompt Congress to pass a set of sanctions in his name."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

oh my. so how does that negate the fact that a human contact corroborated what was in the dossier? oh & there is that little factoid that simpson was under oath when he went b4 congress.

ticky tocky.

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

In the eyes of the law it does equate to "it didn't happen".

not unless it does get proven by a corroborating witness under oath. mueller won't intro anything without hardcore backup.

 

[playtime]

oh my. so how does that negate the fact that a human contact corroborated what was in the dossier? oh & there is that little factoid that simpson was under oath when he went b4 congress.

ticky tocky.

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

The only thing that 'happened' was a dossier based on nothing but hearsay and rumor was falsely presented as a viable document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American Presidential candidate.

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

 

[Meister]

Glenn Simpson! Really? Ha Ha

"Simpson helped write the Trump-Russia dossier, the one compiled by a former British intelligence officer that includes unproven, salacious allegations about President Donald Trump and Russian prostitutes. The dossier's claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia helped spark the FBI investigation now supervised by Special Counsel Robert Mueller."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

Simpson saying the dossier is funny......He helped write it!!!

What's really funny though...

"Simpson has worked for several years on a cause dear to the heart of Vladimir Putin — investigating the case of Sergei Magnitsky, a tax accountant whose death in prison helped prompt Congress to pass a set of sanctions in his name."

Who is Glenn Simpson, man entangled in two Russia scandals?

oh my. so how does that negate the fact that a human contact corroborated what was in the dossier? oh & there is that little factoid that simpson was under oath when he went b4 congress.

ticky tocky.

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

In the eyes of the law it does equate to "it didn't happen".

not unless it does get proven by a corroborating witness under oath. mueller won't intro anything without hardcore backup.

So unproven does equate to didn't happen under the eyes of the judicial system. I knew we could get you there.

 

[Leo123]

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

The only thing that 'happened' was a dossier based on nothing but hearsay and rumor was falsely presented as a viable document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American Presidential candidate.

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

 

[Meister]

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

The only thing that 'happened' was a dossier based on nothing but hearsay and rumor was falsely presented as a viable document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American Presidential candidate.

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

 

[playtime]

oh my. so how does that negate the fact that a human contact corroborated what was in the dossier? oh & there is that little factoid that simpson was under oath when he went b4 congress.

ticky tocky.

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

In the eyes of the law it does equate to "it didn't happen".

not unless it does get proven by a corroborating witness under oath. mueller won't intro anything without hardcore backup.

So unproven does equate to didn't happen under the eyes of the judicial system. I knew we could get you there.

lol... typical poorly educated deplorable with typical deplorable comprehension skills.

 

[playtime]

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

The only thing that 'happened' was a dossier based on nothing but hearsay and rumor was falsely presented as a viable document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American Presidential candidate.

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

A) trump hasn't even been in office 2 years

B) no evidence has been brought forth one way or the other.... yet.

C) impeachment begins in the house & the (D)s are the minority.

D) go back to school

 

[playtime]

The only thing that 'happened' was a dossier based on nothing but hearsay and rumor was falsely presented as a viable document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American Presidential candidate.

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

nooooo.... mueller said that (at the time) trump wasn't a target. that doesn't mean things won't change.

 

[Meister]

lol... you go with that.....

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

nooooo.... mueller said that (at the time) trump wasn't a target. that doesn't mean things won't change.

It kinda infers that they don't have anything on Trump......doesn't it?

 

[Meister]

Human contact? Are you kidding? You consider rumor to be evidence? What part of unproven do you have trouble understanding?

Unproven does not = didn't happen.

In the eyes of the law it does equate to "it didn't happen".

not unless it does get proven by a corroborating witness under oath. mueller won't intro anything without hardcore backup.

So unproven does equate to didn't happen under the eyes of the judicial system. I knew we could get you there.

lol... typical poorly educated deplorable with typical deplorable comprehension skills.

Attacked the messenger and not the message, THAT speaks volumes. Carry on, sonny.

 

[playtime]

I will always go with the truth 'funny-boy', unlike some others that go with whatever rumor fits their fantasy.

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

nooooo.... mueller said that (at the time) trump wasn't a target. that doesn't mean things won't change.

It kinda infers that they don't have anything on Trump......doesn't it?

uh-huh...sure. 'cept flynn wasn't a target until he was. or manafort. or nader.

or cohen.

 

[Meister]

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

nooooo.... mueller said that (at the time) trump wasn't a target. that doesn't mean things won't change.

It kinda infers that they don't have anything on Trump......doesn't it?

uh-huh...sure. 'cept flynn wasn't a target until he was. or manafort. or nader.

or cohen.

'cept nothing was tied to Russia.
Show me the man and I'll show you the crime mentality

 

[bripat9643]

What does any of that have to do with "collusion?"

uh - ya. i said that was just ONE of several charges against that asswipe. & can YOU possibly be any more a poorly educated trumped up dupe? me thinx not.

happy reading:

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4163372/Paul-Manafort-Rick-Gates-Indictment.pdf

now continue being the bling little deplorable robot that i have come to know you to be...

Can you list the one that has to do with "collusion" with Russia?

not gonna say it again... it's conspiracy. paul manafort was the campaign chairman for trump & in big time debt. it starts there with the connection.

"Conspiricy" to do what? Please quote the charge that has to do with Russian collusion. Conspiracy to evade paying taxes has nothing to do with "collusion," dumbass.

oh for fucks sake. you are too dim witted to follow the bouncing ball anyway. it's multi layered & you can research it or stay as dumb as the rest of the deplorables. & you think it's about taxes??????????? LOL!!!!!!!!!! oh how much fun is it gonna be when he goes to trial.... that is if he doesn't flip first.


Paul Manafort

Russian Oligarch Sues Manafort and Gates

In other words, it has nothing to do with collusion. You could have admitted that using much fewer words.

 

[bripat9643]

nothing has been brought forth one way or the other. you insist it's all rumor, & you don't know that for sure. i'm saying it's all a possibility. i do understand why you wanna go with it's all fake...

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

nooooo.... mueller said that (at the time) trump wasn't a target. that doesn't mean things won't change.

It kinda infers that they don't have anything on Trump......doesn't it?

uh-huh...sure. 'cept flynn wasn't a target until he was. or manafort. or nader.

or cohen.

Everyone who ever spoke to Trump is a target, moron.

 

[playtime]

uh - ya. i said that was just ONE of several charges against that asswipe. & can YOU possibly be any more a poorly educated trumped up dupe? me thinx not.

happy reading:

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4163372/Paul-Manafort-Rick-Gates-Indictment.pdf

now continue being the bling little deplorable robot that i have come to know you to be...

Can you list the one that has to do with "collusion" with Russia?

not gonna say it again... it's conspiracy. paul manafort was the campaign chairman for trump & in big time debt. it starts there with the connection.

"Conspiricy" to do what? Please quote the charge that has to do with Russian collusion. Conspiracy to evade paying taxes has nothing to do with "collusion," dumbass.

oh for fucks sake. you are too dim witted to follow the bouncing ball anyway. it's multi layered & you can research it or stay as dumb as the rest of the deplorables. & you think it's about taxes??????????? LOL!!!!!!!!!! oh how much fun is it gonna be when he goes to trial.... that is if he doesn't flip first.


Paul Manafort

Russian Oligarch Sues Manafort and Gates

In other words, it has nothing to do with collusion. You could have admitted that using much fewer words.

in other words you are still a dumb fuck who can't understand why manafort is now in jail awaiting 2 trials for conspiracy to defraud the united states & witness tampering among other charges. & you think it's about taxes. lol.....

 

[playtime]

If the dossier being true was even a remote possibility, the Democrats would have already impeached Trump. It's been about 2 years now and there is absolutely no viable evidence of its truthfulness. Yet, I understand, there are still a lot of butt-stung TDSers who hang on to the merest shred because of their monolithic hatred of Trump.

Also, Mueller has even stated he has nothing on Trump. I doubt he's lying to the democrats.

nooooo.... mueller said that (at the time) trump wasn't a target. that doesn't mean things won't change.

It kinda infers that they don't have anything on Trump......doesn't it?

uh-huh...sure. 'cept flynn wasn't a target until he was. or manafort. or nader.

or cohen.

Everyone who ever spoke to Trump is a target, moron.

nope. some are merely persons of interest, you dumb fuck.

 

[Meister]

Can you list the one that has to do with "collusion" with Russia?

not gonna say it again... it's conspiracy. paul manafort was the campaign chairman for trump & in big time debt. it starts there with the connection.

"Conspiricy" to do what? Please quote the charge that has to do with Russian collusion. Conspiracy to evade paying taxes has nothing to do with "collusion," dumbass.

oh for fucks sake. you are too dim witted to follow the bouncing ball anyway. it's multi layered & you can research it or stay as dumb as the rest of the deplorables. & you think it's about taxes??????????? LOL!!!!!!!!!! oh how much fun is it gonna be when he goes to trial.... that is if he doesn't flip first.


Paul Manafort

Russian Oligarch Sues Manafort and Gates

In other words, it has nothing to do with collusion. You could have admitted that using much fewer words.

in other words you are still a dumb fuck who can't understand why manafort is now in jail awaiting 2 trials for conspiracy to defraud the united states & witness tampering among other charges. & you think it's about taxes. lol.....

And this has to do with what????? And, you call me a dumb fuck???

 

[bripat9643]

Can you list the one that has to do with "collusion" with Russia?

not gonna say it again... it's conspiracy. paul manafort was the campaign chairman for trump & in big time debt. it starts there with the connection.

"Conspiricy" to do what? Please quote the charge that has to do with Russian collusion. Conspiracy to evade paying taxes has nothing to do with "collusion," dumbass.

oh for fucks sake. you are too dim witted to follow the bouncing ball anyway. it's multi layered & you can research it or stay as dumb as the rest of the deplorables. & you think it's about taxes??????????? LOL!!!!!!!!!! oh how much fun is it gonna be when he goes to trial.... that is if he doesn't flip first.


Paul Manafort

Russian Oligarch Sues Manafort and Gates

In other words, it has nothing to do with collusion. You could have admitted that using much fewer words.

in other words you are still a dumb fuck who can't understand why manafort is now in jail awaiting 2 trials for conspiracy to defraud the united states & witness tampering among other charges. & you think it's about taxes. lol.....

That's all it's about, dumbass. What did he supposedly defraud the U.S.government out of if not tax money? You insist it's something else, but you never explain. . That's because there's nothing to explain. You hooked on to something that sounds sinister, but it's actually just bullshit.