Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just admit you have no idea.
Just admit you have no idea.
100% stupid!! I have the idea that in the last 20 years ATT has provided cell phone service to 1/3 the nation!! while you, being independent of brains, decided they did nothing in the last 20 years
And you consider doing MORE of THE SAME to be making the world better?
Just looked it up...AT&T had NOTHING to do with the development of 3G or 4G/LTE.
They simply bought the hardware to comply with customer demand on a product they never saw coming.
And you consider doing MORE of THE SAME to be making the world better?
100% stupid!!! most of the entire cell phone revolution took place since the 1990's!!!A cell phone is not the same as a land line phone!!!!!!
Wrong...two choices...AT&T and Verizon.Just looked it up...AT&T had NOTHING to do with the development of 3G or 4G/LTE.
They simply bought the hardware to comply with customer demand on a product they never saw coming.
100% stupid!! ATT is in a life and death competition to survive in the cell phone business and thus has brought cell phone service to 1/3 of the nation who prefers them to any other choice!
I said all they did was buy equipment.
Wrong...two choices...AT&T and Verizon.
.
In other words, upgrading an entire (agriculture) sector via command economics can be an investment in the general welfare.Dear, simply using a dictionary is a form of special pleading. You have to cite an encyclopedia.Simply because only no Government contains no socialism.dears, what will Always be literally incredible in this discussion, is any penchant for diversion instead of clarification of concepts.
What do those of the opposing view mean by free market capitalism, and how is it different from an AnCap?
Easy, small and/or limited government vs no government.
Why do you ask?
Thus, it is about Good management.
I had provided dictionary definitions of socialism that shows that that is not the case.
Please do something to support your argument that all government is socialism other than simply arguing from assertion.
Good management is another one of your little catch phrases that you MISUSE with a meaning that no one else gives it, and thus does not understand.
Not that you ever are clear about what the meaning is, you seem to think that it is up to the rest of us to deduce it from context.
Except that your context is mostly incoherent and btw, that's really rude.
the economics is simple. better paying jobs come from new inventions. the more efficient farming gets, for example, the more farmers can be paid.
In other words, upgrading an entire (agriculture) sector via command economics can be an investment in the general welfare.
My standards, and those of most of my friends, require the coverage provided by AT&T and Verizon.Wrong...two choices...AT&T and Verizon.
.
dear, if I said there were only 2 choices I'll pay you $10,000. Bet??
No dear, it comes from you having nothing but fallacy and repeal, instead of a better argument; and, ceding the point as a result.Dear, socialism is a requirement for Government as we know it.Simply because only no Government contains no socialism.
No.. You are conflating a concept of social cooperative with tenets of Socialism. Granted, the ideology of Socialism is constructed upon this concept ...that does not make them the same.
Logical fallacy of argument by Assertion.
Proof by assertion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction.[1] Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (argumentum ad nauseam).[2] In other cases, its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the appeal to authority or appeal to belief fallacies."
That's like saying the US has killed people to upgrade it's communications systems.In other words, upgrading an entire (agriculture) sector via command economics can be an investment in the general welfare.
100% stupid liberal!!!! in the USSR and Red China it was an investment in killing 120 million souls
I don't want T-Mobile or Sprint.
Dear, it was bad management. Only shills can't tell the difference.In other words, upgrading an entire (agriculture) sector via command economics can be an investment in the general welfare.
100% stupid liberal!!!! in the USSR and Red China it was an investment in killing 120 million souls
Killing people was a Totalitarian decision made by a sick mind, it had nothing to do with developing an infrastructure.
I don't want T-Mobile or Sprint.
100% stupid!! I have t mobile because it is by far the best where I am and millions agree!!!
Dear, it was bad management.
I believe they were also paranoid.Killing people was a Totalitarian decision made by a sick mind, it had nothing to do with developing an infrastructure.
dear, Stalin and Mao made totalitarian communist decisions to develop their respective farming infrastructures.
Do you have the IQ to understand that?
