Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It could also be that all the wind farms in West Texas have disrupted wind flow.Good call..Got going a bit earlier but good call. System has developed off Sc/ga coastline and is already displaying an eye characteristic. Gotta watch this for further development and the track-will it move north or northeast?Cool high pressure is moving into midatlantic and as it moves out it will open up the eastern seaboard for something tropical. Be on the lookout for the 7-10 day
The high I talked about is strong so that will aid the easterly flow and winds
Would not be surprised to see mouth of the Chesapeake bay experience 50mph winds or gusts and even D.C. Gets some 15-20 sustained with gusts to 30. These values do not anticipate unexpected strengthening but that has to be a consideration to watch
The western high is just holding Harvey over Texas. It looked like it was weakening but heat off of the desert reinforced the high pressure. I have never seen two blocking highs in close proximity until now.
Dr Spencer is correct and this is why all modeling fails to date.Great article. I especially like the part where he said:Even arch-denier Roy Spencer says that SSDDs "it's just the mass of the atmosphere!" theory is loopy.
Why Atmospheric Pressure Cannot Explain the Elevated Surface Temperature of the Earth « Roy Spencer, PhD
If Roy Spencer is debunking your fraud, you know it must be mega-fraud. I suggest SSDD read it, especially the two thought experiments.
"I continue to maintain that the major source of error in global warming predictions based upon the IPCC models is not in the physics of the greenhouse effect, but in the realm of feedbacks: especially, how clouds respond to a warming tendency. All of the 20+ models predict clouds will enhance warming; I believe they will reduce warming.
Unfortunately, determining cloud feedbacks from our observations of the climate system is an exceedingly difficult problem. Even more difficult is publishing any evidence of negative cloud feedback in the peer reviewed literature."
Yes, very interesting. If we study this well enough and learn enough about it, we may actually be able to use these effects to our advantage.It could also be that all the wind farms in West Texas have disrupted wind flow.Good call..Got going a bit earlier but good call. System has developed off Sc/ga coastline and is already displaying an eye characteristic. Gotta watch this for further development and the track-will it move north or northeast?Cool high pressure is moving into midatlantic and as it moves out it will open up the eastern seaboard for something tropical. Be on the lookout for the 7-10 day
The high I talked about is strong so that will aid the easterly flow and winds
Would not be surprised to see mouth of the Chesapeake bay experience 50mph winds or gusts and even D.C. Gets some 15-20 sustained with gusts to 30. These values do not anticipate unexpected strengthening but that has to be a consideration to watch
The western high is just holding Harvey over Texas. It looked like it was weakening but heat off of the desert reinforced the high pressure. I have never seen two blocking highs in close proximity until now.
Wind Power Found to Affect Local Climate
Wind farms can alter the nearby rainfall and temperature, suggesting a need for more comprehensive studies of future energy systems
Wind Power Found to Affect Local Climate
Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
That's fine, you can call it anything you like. You already call the scientific consensus a pile of BS, so I doubt I would change your mind if I buried you in facts or not. I learned that here pretty quickly. Anyone who truly wants to know the truth of my post will look it up themselves.Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
I'll see your pile of crap and raise you FACTS..That's fine, you can call it anything you like. You already call the scientific consensus a pile of BS, so I doubt I would change your mind if I buried you in facts or not. I learned that here pretty quickly. Anyone who truly wants to know the truth of my post will look it up themselves.Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
Ever since the first very cool high moved off Maine the eastern seaboard got exposed and that set up is continuing and here comes IrmaGot going a bit earlier but good call. System has developed off Sc/ga coastline and is already displaying an eye characteristic. Gotta watch this for further development and the track-will it move north or northeast?Cool high pressure is moving into midatlantic and as it moves out it will open up the eastern seaboard for something tropical. Be on the lookout for the 7-10 day
The high I talked about is strong so that will aid the easterly flow and winds
Would not be surprised to see mouth of the Chesapeake bay experience 50mph winds or gusts and even D.C. Gets some 15-20 sustained with gusts to 30. These values do not anticipate unexpected strengthening but that has to be a consideration to watch
Fort Fun, you should know that when dealing with Silly Billy, you dealing with someone totally out of touch with reality. He has been 180 degrees wrong on the ENSO three times, insisting even when the reports of water temperatures were out, that he was still correct.That's fine, you can call it anything you like. You already call the scientific consensus a pile of BS, so I doubt I would change your mind if I buried you in facts or not. I learned that here pretty quickly. Anyone who truly wants to know the truth of my post will look it up themselves.Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
That would not be valid reasoning to say you have enough information there to conclude the entire of the climate is not warming. We have enough information to know that it is. that is why this idea enjoys overwhelming scientific consensus.
Fort Fun, you should know that when dealing with Silly Billy, you dealing with someone totally out of touch with reality. He has been 180 degrees wrong on the ENSO three times, insisting even when the reports of water temperatures were out, that he was still correct.That's fine, you can call it anything you like. You already call the scientific consensus a pile of BS, so I doubt I would change your mind if I buried you in facts or not. I learned that here pretty quickly. Anyone who truly wants to know the truth of my post will look it up themselves.Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
Your argument are ridiculous, your "evidence" misrepresented, and you are spreading lies. You cherry pick data to create a general argument about theories supported my more data than you cherry pick by a factor of millions. You imply the absurd claim that climate scientists labor under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You completely ignore the work of the community dedicating their lives to science, while parroting the talking points of bloggers paid to lie to you. No, the "grand minimum" will not offset global warming. Yes, you are wrong.
Your argument are ridiculous, your "evidence" misrepresented, and you are spreading lies. You cherry pick data to create a general argument about theories supported my more data than you cherry pick by a factor of millions. You imply the absurd claim that climate scientists labor under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You completely ignore the work of the community dedicating their lives to science, while parroting the talking points of bloggers paid to lie to you. No, the "grand minimum" will not offset global warming. Yes, you are wrong.
Oh, where is my little tin hat, little tin hat, little tin hat..........................................................................................................Your argument are ridiculous, your "evidence" misrepresented, and you are spreading lies. You cherry pick data to create a general argument about theories supported my more data than you cherry pick by a factor of millions. You imply the absurd claim that climate scientists labor under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You completely ignore the work of the community dedicating their lives to science, while parroting the talking points of bloggers paid to lie to you. No, the "grand minimum" will not offset global warming. Yes, you are wrong.
So, I ask you (and all the other man-made climate change/global warming proponents) this same, very simple question.....
How can you have a benchmark for what the global temp is when geo-engineering is not figured into the equation and why is it that we have "global dimming" where up to 20 percent less sunlight is reaching the surface of the earth?
Unless you figure in all the factors? Why should I buy what you are selling?????? And if you don't know about geo-engineering? Then you are simply spewing U.N talking points given to them by the IPCC that works at the leisure of the U.N???
Oh, where is my little tin hat, little tin hat, little tin hat..........................................................................................................Your argument are ridiculous, your "evidence" misrepresented, and you are spreading lies. You cherry pick data to create a general argument about theories supported my more data than you cherry pick by a factor of millions. You imply the absurd claim that climate scientists labor under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You completely ignore the work of the community dedicating their lives to science, while parroting the talking points of bloggers paid to lie to you. No, the "grand minimum" will not offset global warming. Yes, you are wrong.
So, I ask you (and all the other man-made climate change/global warming proponents) this same, very simple question.....
How can you have a benchmark for what the global temp is when geo-engineering is not figured into the equation and why is it that we have "global dimming" where up to 20 percent less sunlight is reaching the surface of the earth?
Unless you figure in all the factors? Why should I buy what you are selling?????? And if you don't know about geo-engineering? Then you are simply spewing U.N talking points given to them by the IPCC that works at the leisure of the U.N???
That's fine, you can call it anything you like. You already call the scientific consensus a pile of BS, so I doubt I would change your mind if I buried you in facts or not. I learned that here pretty quickly. Anyone who truly wants to know the truth of my post will look it up themselves.Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
Your argument are ridiculous, your "evidence" misrepresented, and you are spreading lies. You cherry pick data to create a general argument about theories supported my more data than you cherry pick by a factor of millions. You imply the absurd claim that climate scientists labor under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You completely ignore the work of the community dedicating their lives to science, while parroting the talking points of bloggers paid to lie to you. No, the "grand minimum" will not offset global warming. Yes, you are wrong.
So, I ask you (and all the other man-made climate change/global warming proponents) this same, very simple question.....
How can you have a benchmark for what the global temp is when geo-engineering is not figured into the equation and why is it that we have "global dimming" where up to 20 percent less sunlight is reaching the surface of the earth?
Unless you figure in all the factors? Why should I buy what you are selling?????? And if you don't know about geo-engineering? Then you are simply spewing U.N talking points given to them by the IPCC that works at the leisure of the U.N???
That's fine, you can call it anything you like. You already call the scientific consensus a pile of BS, so I doubt I would change your mind if I buried you in facts or not. I learned that here pretty quickly. Anyone who truly wants to know the truth of my post will look it up themselves.Got to call your post a pile of BS.. Prove your assertions..[Was watching Science Channel regarding the solar eclipse and a very interesting point was made.
Over the years sunspots have a cycle when there are years when there are many sunspots and years where there are very few if any.
It is called the "Grand Minimum".
Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks,” published on 31 January 2012
From a comment on the Ice Age Now Post:
From what I see on this page it sounds like the researchers are not aware of what causes the increased volcanic activity and earthquakes in the first place. Namely a very weak solar cycle is directly linked to a substantial increase in volcanic activity. The “experts” are still having a hard time connecting the dots.
The Next Grand Minimum
View attachment 145286
Notice the period from 1400 to 1800 known as the "little Ice Age"...
Here are some pictures from that time that the Thames river froze over.
When has the Thames froze over?
In the 200 years that have elapsed since, the Thames has never frozen solid enough for such hedonism to be repeated. But between 1309 and 1814, the Thames froze at least 23 times and on five of these occasions -1683-4, 1716, 1739-40, 1789 and 1814 - the ice was thick enough to hold a fair.Jan 28, 2014
View attachment 145288
This cooling will not be enough to offset global warming. And when it's done, the globe will be hotter again and still warming.
Why should anyone look up the "proof" to help someone who posts personal opinion based on what?
The major difference between you and me at least is I don't want people to be influenced by MY personal opinion but by the FACTS that are substantiated with the
LINKS that provided the facts. You should do the same instead of being too lazy and asking others.
