Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, they're not, Jake. They're exempt from the law
Some animals are more equal than others
Which part of the law are they exempt from?
Don't be lazy and say the whole thing. Because that will only prove you don't know what you're talking about.
I mean I know you don't, but you'd remove all doubt if thats how you respond.
it is not that they are exempt from the law.
Instead, they will be subsidized by the tax payer for any increase in cost for insurance caused by the ACA....even if they do not financially qualify for the subsidy.
To me, that is a slap in the face.
Wait a minute, if ObamaCare is better and more affordable why would he feel the need to exempt his staff?
Some Reid staffers exempt from Obamacare - CNN.com
They're not exempt from Obamacare. Nice twist.
They're not being forced to buy from the exchanges like others are (incorrectly) being forced to.
But then again, you're too partisan to understand what "exempt" from Obamacare even means.
Continue the hackery.
Not true. Anyone not insured is forced to pay a penalty/tax or buy a product. Continue on with your hackery. You have it down to an art.
No, they're not, Jake. They're exempt from the law
Some animals are more equal than others
Which part of the law are they exempt from?
Don't be lazy and say the whole thing. Because that will only prove you don't know what you're talking about.
I mean I know you don't, but you'd remove all doubt if thats how you respond.
it is not that they are exempt from the law.
Instead, they will be subsidized by the tax payer for any increase in cost for insurance caused by the ACA....even if they do not financially qualify for the subsidy.
To me, that is a slap in the face.
They're not part of the ObamaCare exchanges
Some animals are more equal than others. Period.
ObamaCare Exchange for thee, not for me - H Reid, Drug Mule
No, they're not, Jake. They're exempt from the law
Some animals are more equal than others
Which part of the law are they exempt from?
Don't be lazy and say the whole thing. Because that will only prove you don't know what you're talking about.
I mean I know you don't, but you'd remove all doubt if thats how you respond.
it is not that they are exempt from the law.
Instead, they will be subsidized by the tax payer for any increase in cost for insurance caused by the ACA....even if they do not financially qualify for the subsidy.
To me, that is a slap in the face.
No, they're not, Jake. They're exempt from the law
Some animals are more equal than others
Which part of the law are they exempt from?
Don't be lazy and say the whole thing. Because that will only prove you don't know what you're talking about.
I mean I know you don't, but you'd remove all doubt if thats how you respond.
Here's the article you didn't feel you needed to read before your reflexive defense of your Messiah
"Washington (CNN) -- Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, one of Obamacare's architects and staunchest supporters, is also the only top congressional leader to exempt some of his staff from having to buy insurance through the law's new exchanges.
Reid is the exception among the other top congressional leaders. GOP House Speaker John Boehner, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell have all directed their staffs to join the exchange, their aides said.
After website woes, President pushes benefits of Obamacare
In the charged atmosphere surrounding Obamacare, Reid's decision only gives Republicans more ammo to attack Democrats already suffering politically from the law's botched rollout.
In September, Reid told reporters, "Let's stop these really juvenile political games -- the one dealing with health care for senators and House members and our staff. We are going to be part of exchanges, that's what the law says and we'll be part of that."
I highlighted the key parts.
Find a grown up, preferably someone who can read English, and have them read it to you
The staffers follow the law.
Let's move along.
So did slave owners. Guess we should have just moved along.
Why is this in the law?
Wait a minute, if ObamaCare is better and more affordable why would he feel the need to exempt his staff?
Some Reid staffers exempt from Obamacare - CNN.com
The staffers follow the law.
Let's move along.
Which part of the law are they exempt from?
Don't be lazy and say the whole thing. Because that will only prove you don't know what you're talking about.
I mean I know you don't, but you'd remove all doubt if thats how you respond.
Here's the article you didn't feel you needed to read before your reflexive defense of your Messiah
"Washington (CNN) -- Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, one of Obamacare's architects and staunchest supporters, is also the only top congressional leader to exempt some of his staff from having to buy insurance through the law's new exchanges.
Reid is the exception among the other top congressional leaders. GOP House Speaker John Boehner, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell have all directed their staffs to join the exchange, their aides said.
After website woes, President pushes benefits of Obamacare
In the charged atmosphere surrounding Obamacare, Reid's decision only gives Republicans more ammo to attack Democrats already suffering politically from the law's botched rollout.
In September, Reid told reporters, "Let's stop these really juvenile political games -- the one dealing with health care for senators and House members and our staff. We are going to be part of exchanges, that's what the law says and we'll be part of that."
I highlighted the key parts.
Find a grown up, preferably someone who can read English, and have them read it to you
Since you ignored my response the first time you posted this.
What you bolded doesn't say they are exempt from Obamacare. Just exempt from being forced to buy from the exchanges, which is certainly NOT a part of the original law.
Here's the article you didn't feel you needed to read before your reflexive defense of your Messiah
"Washington (CNN) -- Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, one of Obamacare's architects and staunchest supporters, is also the only top congressional leader to exempt some of his staff from having to buy insurance through the law's new exchanges.
Reid is the exception among the other top congressional leaders. GOP House Speaker John Boehner, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell have all directed their staffs to join the exchange, their aides said.
After website woes, President pushes benefits of Obamacare
In the charged atmosphere surrounding Obamacare, Reid's decision only gives Republicans more ammo to attack Democrats already suffering politically from the law's botched rollout.
In September, Reid told reporters, "Let's stop these really juvenile political games -- the one dealing with health care for senators and House members and our staff. We are going to be part of exchanges, that's what the law says and we'll be part of that."
I highlighted the key parts.
Find a grown up, preferably someone who can read English, and have them read it to you
Since you ignored my response the first time you posted this.
What you bolded doesn't say they are exempt from Obamacare. Just exempt from being forced to buy from the exchanges, which is certainly NOT a part of the original law.
But they're exempt from the law, right?
Was Reid lying in September when he said they "are going to be part of exchanges, that's what the law says and we'll be part of that."?
OK, do we have any facts that Some Reid staffers exempt from Obamacare and that they are not complaint with the law?
Since you ignored my response the first time you posted this.
What you bolded doesn't say they are exempt from Obamacare. Just exempt from being forced to buy from the exchanges, which is certainly NOT a part of the original law.
But they're exempt from the law, right?
Was Reid lying in September when he said they "are going to be part of exchanges, that's what the law says and we'll be part of that."?
No, they're not exempt from the law. I don't know how many different ways you need to be told. I know you're not THIS dumb Frank.
Wait a minute, if ObamaCare is better and more affordable why would he feel the need to exempt his staff?
Some Reid staffers exempt from Obamacare - CNN.com
Why don't you just create a signature that proclaims your woeful ignorance about what exactly the ACA is, and who signs up for it through the exchanges? The point is this: People who already have insurance don't need the exchanges although they too will benefit by new minimum standards and other parts of the law which prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage for previous conditions.
Requiring an employer, the US government to cancel health insurance for a select group of employees really doesn't make much sense particularly since it will cost the government more money to do so. Government employees receive a subsidy of 70% of the cost of health insurance premiums and this will continue for congressional staff when they buy individual health insurance off the exchanges. Since the premiums for individual insurance on or off the exchanges are significantly higher than employee sponsored insurance, costs will go up for the government. However, we all know that this has nothing to do with costs. It's all about politics.Wait a minute, if ObamaCare is better and more affordable why would he feel the need to exempt his staff?
Some Reid staffers exempt from Obamacare - CNN.com
Which part of the law are they exempt from?
Don't be lazy and say the whole thing. Because that will only prove you don't know what you're talking about.
I mean I know you don't, but you'd remove all doubt if thats how you respond.
it is not that they are exempt from the law.
Instead, they will be subsidized by the tax payer for any increase in cost for insurance caused by the ACA....even if they do not financially qualify for the subsidy.
To me, that is a slap in the face.
Who says that their subsidy for health insurance will increase? Where do you get your information from?
Wait a minute, if ObamaCare is better and more affordable why would he feel the need to exempt his staff?
Some Reid staffers exempt from Obamacare - CNN.com
Why don't you just create a signature that proclaims your woeful ignorance about what exactly the ACA is, and who signs up for it through the exchanges? The point is this: People who already have insurance don't need the exchanges although they too will benefit by new minimum standards and other parts of the law which prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage for previous conditions.
