Soros Wanted to Federalize Local Police. Thank God for Trump in 2017

It's probably one of Soros's better ideas. A lot of US police forces are a joke.
 
I think it's better when the states operate more independently, because then you have more freedom.

How? The police are the police and the law is the law...I'm more 'free' in New Mexico if I get arrested for robbery by a NM cop, than if I do the same in Minnesota? Interesting...
 
It's probably one of Soros's better ideas. A lot of US police forces are a joke.
Your a joke. See you want a federal police force like North Korea.

Most western countries have a single police force. Some don't. Australia doesn't. The UK doesn't. However most other places do. I don't think Germany doesn't either. I'm just saying, why does it matter.
 
It's probably one of Soros's better ideas. A lot of US police forces are a joke.
Your a joke. See you want a federal police force like North Korea.

Most western countries have a single police force. Some don't. Australia doesn't. The UK doesn't. However most other places do. I don't think Germany does either. I'm just saying, why does it matter.
We live under a system of federaism. Policing is a concurrent power.
 
I think most police should be local city, county and state...

The federal government outside of the fbi and some broad powers shouldn't be all powerful.
 
It's probably one of Soros's better ideas. A lot of US police forces are a joke.
Your a joke. See you want a federal police force like North Korea.

Most western countries have a single police force. Some don't. Australia doesn't. The UK doesn't. However most other places do. I don't think Germany doesn't either. I'm just saying, why does it matter.

The rest of the world is screwed up! Why would we want to imitate them?
 
Most western countries have a single police force. Some don't. Australia doesn't. The UK doesn't. However most other places do. I don't think Germany doesn't either. I'm just saying, why does it matter.
  • Because we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution which is the supreme law of the land
  • Because federalizing anything takes power away from the people (where it belongs) and concentrates it in the hands of a few in Washington D.C. (where it doesn't belong)
  • Because history has proven more corruption occurs at a national level than a local level
  • Because history has proven that absolute power corrupts absolutely and that sending more power (and money) to a national political entity ends in oppression.
The fact that you even had to ask such an astoundingly ignorant question is indisputable proof that you are completely unqualified intellectually to be discussing these issues.
 

Forum List

Back
Top