Southern cop shoots man running away in the back..

[PredFan]

and he is now under arrest and facing murder charges....the system seems to be working.....right? But let's not give up an opporotunity to burn out some more businesses...shall we?

Seems to be working because a guy is charged with murder for clearly shooting someone in the back? Thats pretty open and shut and isnt an extraordinary example...but watch this guy get a slap on the wrist and then you can come back and tell me how the system is working again

Ha, but if he doesn't get slapped on the wrist and in fact goes to jail, you won't be admitting you were wrong I guarantee that.

The slap on the wrist will be a light ass sentence...Trust. If its not, understand that will be the exception and not the rule

That's what you progressives tell yourselves in order to maintain your political dogma despite reality. It would be different if you could back it up with something other than left wing blogs.

Oh so here is where you link up to the "reality" that I'm ignoring that shows cops are routinly jailed for their crimes.

Go ahead...I'll wait.

No dumbass, YOU claim it will be the exception and not the rule. YOU need to back it up. I cannot prove a negative.

 

[Conservative65]

Since 100% of those I see living in the Section 8 housing in my city are black, it's not an assumption but proof based on my experience. Should I think differently than what I see.

See? Now tell me again about the unfairness of broad brushing...then present your defense for broad brushing.

The broad brush was made by stating that this cop reduced credibility for all cops. You had no problem with that yet when you claim someone else does it, suddenly it's wrong.

Dude did you just join today? You act like broad brushing blacks is new and unusual.

You're trying to accuse me of doing the same thing you did.

You act like broad brushing cops is new and unusual.

When I see 100% of the Section 8 housing filled with blacks, am I supposed to say it's not 100% in order to appease those who get their feelings hurt with the experience I have.

So let me understand...Are you back to defending broad brushing everyone or is this you opposing it again?

It's not broadbrushing when my experience supports what I claim.

 

[Asclepias]

There is a difference monkey. I didnt make the claim. The police chief made it.

We dont have to test theories when its already a proven fact.

When you accepted it, there is no difference than if you made it yourself. If I quote someone, what I'm doing is saying this is what I would have said had this person not said it first.

Proven theories are called laws. Things that haven't been proven are called theories.

Scared? Sounds like it. I offered you the chance to prove your claim and who refuses to do so? You coward.

Just because you are too dumb to put what you think in your own words dont assume everyone else is like that especially someone like me thats your intellectual superior. You claimed I made the quote monkey. That means you are claiming that Norm Stamper did not make the quote. He has it in his book which means your flea ridden ass is wrong again.

You're the one that quoted someone else then says I'm stupid for quoting someone else. When you used the quote, you made the claim whether the words are originally yours or not.

No monkey. The issue is not if I agree. You claimed I made a quote someone else made. You got busted lying again like your pink timid type typically do when cornered out of fear. Thats why youre stupid. Not because I agree you are a pussy and afraid of Black guys.

I've offered you a chance to prove your claim about my fear of blacks. YOU refused. That makes you the pussy.

Being tough online doesnt prove anything. You are a pussy that would piss yourself in person. We all know in person you just turn red if you met me. That explains why you lied and said I made the claim the police chief made. Why did you lie pussy?

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Since his buddy backed up his story it doesnt seem far fetched does it?

So ALL police officers nationwide lose credibility for what one did?

Should I think all black people live in government housing because all I see living in the govnerment housing in my city are black?

Should you? No

Do you? Yes

Since 100% of those I see living in the Section 8 housing in my city are black, it's not an assumption but proof based on my experience. Should I think differently than what I see.

See? Now tell me again about the unfairness of broad brushing...then present your defense for broad brushing.

The broad brush was made by stating that this cop reduced credibility for all cops. You had no problem with that yet when you claim someone else does it, suddenly it's wrong.

In practical reality it does reduce their credibility, like it or not. If he is convicted, the judge can help restore credibility in the system with a fair sentence of 25 to life

 

[Asclepias]

See? Now tell me again about the unfairness of broad brushing...then present your defense for broad brushing.

The broad brush was made by stating that this cop reduced credibility for all cops. You had no problem with that yet when you claim someone else does it, suddenly it's wrong.

Dude did you just join today? You act like broad brushing blacks is new and unusual.

You're trying to accuse me of doing the same thing you did.

You act like broad brushing cops is new and unusual.

When I see 100% of the Section 8 housing filled with blacks, am I supposed to say it's not 100% in order to appease those who get their feelings hurt with the experience I have.

So let me understand...Are you back to defending broad brushing everyone or is this you opposing it again?

It's not broadbrushing when my experience supports what I claim.

The only experience you have is getting your ass kicked by Black guys. Give us a break!

 

[ClosedCaption]

See? Now tell me again about the unfairness of broad brushing...then present your defense for broad brushing.

The broad brush was made by stating that this cop reduced credibility for all cops. You had no problem with that yet when you claim someone else does it, suddenly it's wrong.

Dude did you just join today? You act like broad brushing blacks is new and unusual.

You're trying to accuse me of doing the same thing you did.

You act like broad brushing cops is new and unusual.

When I see 100% of the Section 8 housing filled with blacks, am I supposed to say it's not 100% in order to appease those who get their feelings hurt with the experience I have.

So let me understand...Are you back to defending broad brushing everyone or is this you opposing it again?

It's not broadbrushing when my experience supports what I claim.

Ironic aint it

 

[ClosedCaption]

Seems to be working because a guy is charged with murder for clearly shooting someone in the back? Thats pretty open and shut and isnt an extraordinary example...but watch this guy get a slap on the wrist and then you can come back and tell me how the system is working again

Ha, but if he doesn't get slapped on the wrist and in fact goes to jail, you won't be admitting you were wrong I guarantee that.

The slap on the wrist will be a light ass sentence...Trust. If its not, understand that will be the exception and not the rule

That's what you progressives tell yourselves in order to maintain your political dogma despite reality. It would be different if you could back it up with something other than left wing blogs.

Oh so here is where you link up to the "reality" that I'm ignoring that shows cops are routinly jailed for their crimes.

Go ahead...I'll wait.

No dumbass, YOU claim it will be the exception and not the rule. YOU need to back it up. I cannot prove a negative.

Yeah but you can prove that cops go to jail all the time for their crimes.,,,now you're looking for a way out

 

[PredFan]

Ha, but if he doesn't get slapped on the wrist and in fact goes to jail, you won't be admitting you were wrong I guarantee that.

The slap on the wrist will be a light ass sentence...Trust. If its not, understand that will be the exception and not the rule

That's what you progressives tell yourselves in order to maintain your political dogma despite reality. It would be different if you could back it up with something other than left wing blogs.

Oh so here is where you link up to the "reality" that I'm ignoring that shows cops are routinly jailed for their crimes.

Go ahead...I'll wait.

No dumbass, YOU claim it will be the exception and not the rule. YOU need to back it up. I cannot prove a negative.

Yeah but you can prove that cops go to jail all the time for their crimes.,,,now you're looking for a way out

I never made that claim dumbass, I'm waiting for you to stop dodging and prove YOUR claim.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The slap on the wrist will be a light ass sentence...Trust. If its not, understand that will be the exception and not the rule

That's what you progressives tell yourselves in order to maintain your political dogma despite reality. It would be different if you could back it up with something other than left wing blogs.

Oh so here is where you link up to the "reality" that I'm ignoring that shows cops are routinly jailed for their crimes.

Go ahead...I'll wait.

No dumbass, YOU claim it will be the exception and not the rule. YOU need to back it up. I cannot prove a negative.

Yeah but you can prove that cops go to jail all the time for their crimes.,,,now you're looking for a way out

I never made that claim dumbass, I'm waiting for you to stop dodging and prove YOUR claim.

So lets look at it again....Heres the quote:

I believe the dead guy being shot by a cop 8 times is the issue. Before this scum bag officer knew that he was recorded he told a very familiar story. That somebody was wild and reckless and tried to hurt him and therefore his life was in danger and so only in last resort in defense of his own life he reluctantly fired his service weapon.

and he is now under arrest and facing murder charges....the system seems to be working.....right? But let's not give up an opporotunity to burn out some more businesses...shall we?

Seems to be working because a guy is charged with murder for clearly shooting someone in the back? Thats pretty open and shut and isnt an extraordinary example...but watch this guy get a slap on the wrist and then you can come back and tell me how the system is working again

Ha, but if he doesn't get slapped on the wrist and in fact goes to jail, you won't be admitting you were wrong I guarantee that.

The slap on the wrist will be a light ass sentence...Trust. If its not, understand that will be the exception and not the rule

That's what you progressives tell yourselves in order to maintain your political dogma despite reality. It would be different if you could back it up with something other than left wing blogs.

What is the reality that Im ignoring?

 

[cnm]

So one reduces credibility for all?

More the story the police produced before the video appeared reduces credibility for all where police word is the only evidence.

 

[AmericanFirst]

If you accept the claim, there is no difference than if you had said it yourself.

Like a said, no n*gger scares me including you boy.

Of course I accept the claim. I just corrected you when you said I made the claim.

Of course you are scared. I intimidate you online with ease. It would be fun to see how redfaced you get around Blacks in real life.

If you accept it, there is no difference than if you had made it.

Why don't we test your theory boy?

There is a difference monkey. I didnt make the claim. The police chief made it.

We dont have to test theories when its already a proven fact.

When you accepted it, there is no difference than if you made it yourself. If I quote someone, what I'm doing is saying this is what I would have said had this person not said it first.

Proven theories are called laws. Things that haven't been proven are called theories.

Scared? Sounds like it. I offered you the chance to prove your claim and who refuses to do so? You coward.

Just because you are too dumb to put what you think in your own words dont assume everyone else is like that especially someone like me thats your intellectual superior. You claimed I made the quote monkey. That means you are claiming that Norm Stamper did not make the quote. He has it in his book which means your flea ridden ass is wrong again.

Offering me a chance to make you piss yourself online is not a challenge. You are safe on the internet. Thats why you only talk to Black people "tough" on the internet. Youre safe.

Why do you have to be such a....., well I won't say it, everyone knows you are what you are.

 

[Asclepias]

Of course I accept the claim. I just corrected you when you said I made the claim.

Of course you are scared. I intimidate you online with ease. It would be fun to see how redfaced you get around Blacks in real life.

If you accept it, there is no difference than if you had made it.

Why don't we test your theory boy?

There is a difference monkey. I didnt make the claim. The police chief made it.

We dont have to test theories when its already a proven fact.

When you accepted it, there is no difference than if you made it yourself. If I quote someone, what I'm doing is saying this is what I would have said had this person not said it first.

Proven theories are called laws. Things that haven't been proven are called theories.

Scared? Sounds like it. I offered you the chance to prove your claim and who refuses to do so? You coward.

Just because you are too dumb to put what you think in your own words dont assume everyone else is like that especially someone like me thats your intellectual superior. You claimed I made the quote monkey. That means you are claiming that Norm Stamper did not make the quote. He has it in his book which means your flea ridden ass is wrong again.

Offering me a chance to make you piss yourself online is not a challenge. You are safe on the internet. Thats why you only talk to Black people "tough" on the internet. Youre safe.

Why do you have to be such a....., well I won't say it, everyone knows you are what you are.

Dominant Black man? Genes boy. Its all in the genes.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This certainly appears to be an open and shut case, unless some new evidence comes forward.

Right at this moment, it appears this officers actions, has caused grave harm to the credibility of police officers throughout the nation.

So one reduces credibility for all?

It shouldn't, but unfortunately due to the mass media's distribution everywhere of this story, officers everywhere will be affected.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Hmmm...not sure what the issue is.....the cop who did the shooting is being held and charged with murder.....so what is the issue....?

That's a good point. Earlier I already heard a group yelling the inevitable "No-Justice-N-Peace-!!" cliche chant.
He's been arrested, and charged. The process will now move forward in the normal fashion. That's all that can be done at this point.

 

[guno]

Another racist troll thread from the racist troll.

And you never fail to show up dripping poo

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hmmm...not sure what the issue is.....the cop who did the shooting is being held and charged with murder.....so what is the issue....?

That's a good point. Earlier I already heard a group yelling the inevitable "No-Justice-N-Peace-!!" cliche chant.
He's been arrested, and charged. The process will now move forward in the normal fashion. That's all that can be done at this point.

You DO know what the "normal fashion" is when it comes to convicting cops dont you?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Hmmm...not sure what the issue is.....the cop who did the shooting is being held and charged with murder.....so what is the issue....?

That's a good point. Earlier I already heard a group yelling the inevitable "No-Justice-N-Peace-!!" cliche chant.
He's been arrested, and charged. The process will now move forward in the normal fashion. That's all that can be done at this point.

You DO know what the "normal fashion" is when it comes to convicting cops dont you?

I'm referring to the legal process. This being the system where we grant a charged individual their day in court.
Hopefully these people and you are not calling for the man to be dragged from his cell and lynched in the public square.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[Asclepias]

Hmmm...not sure what the issue is.....the cop who did the shooting is being held and charged with murder.....so what is the issue....?

That's a good point. Earlier I already heard a group yelling the inevitable "No-Justice-N-Peace-!!" cliche chant.
He's been arrested, and charged. The process will now move forward in the normal fashion. That's all that can be done at this point.

You DO know what the "normal fashion" is when it comes to convicting cops dont you?

I'm referring to the legal process. This being the system where we grant a charged individual their day in court.
Hopefully these people and you are not calling for the man to be dragged from his cell and lynched in the public square.

That would be pretty cool. We have it on video that he shot the guy. Why waste taxpayers money with a trial?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hmmm...not sure what the issue is.....the cop who did the shooting is being held and charged with murder.....so what is the issue....?

That's a good point. Earlier I already heard a group yelling the inevitable "No-Justice-N-Peace-!!" cliche chant.
He's been arrested, and charged. The process will now move forward in the normal fashion. That's all that can be done at this point.

You DO know what the "normal fashion" is when it comes to convicting cops dont you?

I'm referring to the legal process. This being the system where we grant a charged individual their day in court.
Hopefully these people and you are not calling for the man to be dragged from his cell and lynched in the public square.

I asked you if you know what the normal fashion is when it comes to convicting cops?

Because you seem to believe that people should wait and see...but if you know what the "normal fashion" is we can predict it pretty easily