Stand Up For Freedom

[Thunderbird]

More censorship: Natural family called derogatory to gays

 

[paddymurphy]

It's possible that one or more of the persons in the formal review panel did not agree with her decision to refuse to help LGBT clients with their relationships,

I think she would have been happy to help, just not in the way LGBT activists demand.

on the other hand, perhaps they merely felt that discrimination against LGBT was not proper for her position because it was against the ACA Code of Ethics. Either way, that does not equate to an LGBT activist.

The people working to expel this young woman may well be LGBT activists.

LGBT activists infest quite a few universities.

WORLD Court says college administrator has no right to oppose gay rights Leigh Jones Dec. 21 2012

On the latter, yes I can agree with that as you have presented;

Glad we agree.

So, you would argue that a Catholic School could not fire a teacher who marries their same sex partner?

 

[paddymurphy]

More censorship: Natural family called derogatory to gays

Wing Nut Daily.

 

[Thunderbird]

LGBT activists have won a few battles, but future victories will be more difficult. Discrimination against Christians and stifling free speech will not be accepted by Republican libertarians and Democratic working folk (many of whom are Christians).

 

[paddymurphy]

LGBT activists have won a few battles, but future victories will be more difficult. Discrimination against Christians and stifling free speech will not be accepted by Republican libertarians and Democratic working folk (many of whom are Christians).

Since no one is calling for discrimination against Christians or stifling free speech, there should not be a problem.

 

[Thunderbird]

So, you would argue that a Catholic School could not fire a teacher who marries their same sex partner?

Playing with another guy's genitals is a behavior, not an ethnic group.

 

[Thunderbird]

Since no one is calling for discrimination against Christians or stifling free speech, there should not be a problem.

You've already exposed yourself as ignorant with a mind nailed shut against the facts. You don't have to keep trying.

 

[paddymurphy]

Since no one is calling for discrimination against Christians or stifling free speech, there should not be a problem.

You've already exposed yourself as ignorant with a mind nailed shut against the facts. You don't have to keep trying.

And you have been exposed a lying piece of shit.

 

[paddymurphy]

So, you would argue that a Catholic School could not fire a teacher who marries their same sex partner?

Playing with another guy's genitals is a behavior, not an ethnic group.

So, you apparently cannot read. Not surprising.

 

[Thunderbird]

So, you apparently cannot read. Not surprising.

So you apparently can't understand. Not surprising.

 

[candycorn]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

 

[Thunderbird]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

OMG you had that before! You don't need the government to get married! lol

 

[paddymurphy]

So, you apparently cannot read. Not surprising.

So you apparently can't understand. Not surprising.

Then explain to me what your comment has to do with mine.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

You are not alone
Majority Back Two Big Supreme Court Decisions
June 30, 2015By Taegan Goddardhttp://politicalwire.com/2015/06/30/majority-back-two-big-supreme-court-decisions/#disqus_thread


A new CNN/ORC poll finds that 63% support the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding government assistance for lower-income Americans buying health insurance through both state-operated and federally-run health insurance exchanges.

Slightly fewer, 59%, say they back the ruling which made same-sex marriages legal in all 50 states.

 

[candycorn]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

OMG you had that before! You don't need the government to get married! lol

Just for it to have the same legal benefits of heterosexual couples.

 

[Thunderbird]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

You are not alone
Majority Back Two Big Supreme Court Decisions
June 30, 2015By Taegan Goddard


A new CNN/ORC poll finds that 63% support the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding government assistance for lower-income Americans buying health insurance through both state-operated and federally-run health insurance exchanges.

Slightly fewer, 59%, say they back the ruling which made same-sex marriages legal in all 50 states.

Poll numbers can be manipulated. For example, the wording of the first poll seems biased.

According to another poll 51% think laws about homosexual marriage should be decided on a state level. Only 41% thought it should be decided at a national level.

51% think small business owners who provide wedding-related services should be allowed to refuse services to same-sex couples if same-sex marriage violates their religious beliefs. Only 42% think they should be required.

Source: Civil Rights

 

[paddymurphy]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

You are not alone
Majority Back Two Big Supreme Court Decisions
June 30, 2015By Taegan Goddard


A new CNN/ORC poll finds that 63% support the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding government assistance for lower-income Americans buying health insurance through both state-operated and federally-run health insurance exchanges.

Slightly fewer, 59%, say they back the ruling which made same-sex marriages legal in all 50 states.

Poll numbers can be manipulated. For example, the wording of the first poll seems biased.

According to another poll 51% think laws about homosexual marriage should be decided on a state level. Only 41% thought it should be decided at a national level.

51% think small business owners who provide wedding-related services should be allowed to refuse services to same-sex couples if same-sex marriage violates their religious beliefs. Only 42% think they should be required.

Source: Civil Rights

And neither of your questions ask the same question of this poll which is whether they agree with the Court's ruling. Pretty straight forward question.

 

[Thunderbird]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

OMG you had that before! You don't need the government to get married! lol

Just for it to have the same legal benefits of heterosexual couples.

Glad to see you realize your earlier statement was foolish.

Homosexuals are not an ethnic group. And the benefits of government approved marriage are dubious.

 

[candycorn]

Freedom to marry whomever you wish...yes I believe in freedom.

OMG you had that before! You don't need the government to get married! lol

Just for it to have the same legal benefits of heterosexual couples.

Glad to see you realize your earlier statement was foolish.

Homosexuals are not an ethnic group. And the benefits of government approved marriage are dubious.

Never said they were.
The only thing dubious is your claim to sanity.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Yo whats with the Jiggery Pokkery conservatives.....