Dr Gregg
Rookie
- Jan 28, 2010
- 2,901
- 201
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
As you continue to make shit up and twist what I'm arguing. Having a more centralized government and federal rules and regulations, like we have today and has been that way for a long time, is not anarchy. Where are you getting this from?The power of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution was established in Case Law, not the Constitution. Somebody help. Was this Marbury v. Madison?
right, so we haven't followed the constitution in decades and decades?
And what else would the judicial branch do if they did'nt interpret laws? What was the point of the judicial branch then if not to determine if laws are unconstitutional or not? To look pretty in robes?
And wouldn't the courts ruling that be in fact constitutional?
So your contention is they ignore it but WHY follow it? Dangerous thinking...but right on track with Obama, The Congress and other Statist Nutjobs.
Now forget---That the Constitution IS what ALL American LAW is based.
What you propose is Anarchy.
You sir, are a fuckin' DOPE.
So the constitution doesn't say that the Judicial branch determines whether laws are unconstitutional or not? Then how is it that they do such a thing, and have been doing it for a while now?