Stolen Elections

[Faun]

Yes it can be a ruse to say it was a human error.
View attachment 787665

Thanks for avoiding everything in my post. Makes my job so.much easier.

 

[Faun]

another meaningless assertion

to you have any factual evidence you can prove

Nothing at all. That one is fueled by imagination.

 

[Lastamender]

You traitor. Sending fake Trump electors to flip the election to the LOSER is not challenging the election. It's trying to steal it.

Those electors were symbolic. They broke 0 laws.

 

[Lastamender]

Thanks for avoiding everything in my post. Makes my job so.much easier.

Everything to you is nothing to anyone else. Might be time you figured that out.

 

[Faun]

Those electors were symbolic. They broke 0 laws.

As always, you prove to be utterly demented.

If there were no crimes committed, why are some of them taking immunity deals in order to go after bigger fish?

Most Fake Trump Electors Have Taken Immunity Deals in Georgia Case

Prosecutors are nearing charging decisions after investigating whether former President Donald J. Trump and his allies illegally meddled in Georgia’s 2020 election.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Lastamender]

As always, you prove to be utterly demented.

If there were no crimes committed, why are some of them taking immunity deals in order to go after bigger fish?

Most Fake Trump Electors Have Taken Immunity Deals in Georgia Case

Prosecutors are nearing charging decisions after investigating whether former President Donald J. Trump and his allies illegally meddled in Georgia’s 2020 election.

www.nytimes.com

I do not care. It is not a crime.

 

[Faun]

Everything to you is nothing to anyone else. Might be time you figured that out.

Exactly what I expect from you cowards who can't defend your bullshit.

 

[Faun]

I do not care. It is not a crime.

LOLOL

Says you, a demented idiot who still thinks the election was stolen even though you still can't prove it after nearly 31 months and counting.

The GBI, who actually knows the law infinitely more than you, says otherwise.

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOL

Says you, a demented idiot who still thinks the election was stolen even though you still can't prove it after nearly 31 months and counting.

The GBI, who actually knows the law infinitely more than you, says otherwise.

The courts refuse to hear real evidence. How do you prove anything in a corrupt system? You don't, and you assholes know it. It has been proven to me and over half the voters in this country.

Please quote the law the GBI is using.

 

[Faun]

The courts refuse to hear real evidence. How do you prove anything in a corrupt system? You don't, and you assholes know it. It has been proven to me and over half the voters in this country.

Lies don't help you, FruitLoops. In about half the cases, judges looked at the evidence, determined it didn't hold water, and tossed it for lacking merit.

Please quote the law the GBI is using.

Prolly Ga. Code § 21-2-603

 

[Lastamender]

Lies don't help you, FruitLoops. In about half the cases, judges looked at the evidence, determined it didn't hold water, and tossed it for lacking merit.



Prolly Ga. Code § 21-2-603

Lies are all you have and they have not helped you a bit.

 

[Faun]

Lies are all you have and they have not helped you a bit.

Poor baby.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The courts refuse to hear real evidence. How do you prove anything in a corrupt system? You don't, and you assholes know it. It has been proven to me and over half the voters in this country.

Please quote the law the GBI is using.

There is no 'real evidence'. That is your problem that you don't accept the truth. You are the one who is corrupt and you know it.

 

[Lastamender]

There is no 'real evidence'. That is your problem that you don't accept the truth. You are the one who is corrupt and you know it.

This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[HaShev]

another meaningless assertion

to you have any factual evidence you can prove

Did they give evidence that the error was human? No. So by your logic.....
Did Dominion give evidence on the switch votes debacle? No, they merely stated it was computer glitch with zero proof how what, where, and why.
Law suits are not proof, detailing evidence works 2 ways, if you claim it a glitch, then prove it.
Lastly nobody answered the simple question, what are the odds they always go Dems way after already being caught cheating other things over the years, like debates, like twice in Dade County same lady head of voting Snipes incident, scripting press questions, Clinton caught cheating Bernie etc. It's a known DNC tactic win any way possible to stay in power and stay out of jail.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No, HaShev. You have to provide answers to your questions. The other side does not have to prove you wrong at all. You have to prove yourself right.

You have no factual evidence.

 

[Faun]

This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

Those are just claims. That's not evidence.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Those are just claims. That's not evidence.

If the Trumpys would produce evidence of their assertions, of course the judges will evaluate them.

But the judges' jobs are not to investigate unsupported claims.

 

[leftwinger]

Even Georgia still has items outstanding in Court:

• Fulton County counted 22,534 more mail-in ballots than received
• 74 Georgia Counties can’t produce original ballot images
• Fulton County Election Day Vote Discrepancy (14k reported as voting on Election Day but numbers would show over 59k!)
• Fulton Co can’t find 376,000 [original] ballot images
• 17,000 missing ballot images – Fulton
• Out of 148,318 ballot images, only 16,034 SHA files (hash validation) were provided

 

[HaShev]

No, HaShev. You have to provide answers to your questions. The other side does not have to prove you wrong at all. You have to prove yourself right.

You have no factual evidence.

Oh yes you do, because according to you, they offer no proof means it's not true, until they prove it's true otherwise you are arguing Trump's case. Their track record to lie is through the roof, so the lack of trust is 100% Valid and any claim otherwise or ad hominem response is more evidence something is wrong, because truth doesn't need lies and deflections, smokescreens and fascist responses.-fact!