Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The years 2013 to 2015 were during the BushCo economic crash recovery. Much different today.
The issue is Walmart, NOT one-size-fits-all.
Did you bother to read your own article idiot? This applies to all big to medium size corporations. Not just Walmart.
My issue is Walmart. But the fact remains that there aren't any companies that can't afford to pay a $15.00 an hour minimum wage.
Maybe the socialist could sell a few of his homes to help the poor.
The issue is stock manipulation, $4 trillion since 2009.
Make your point.
He did. Perhaps you should educate yourself on why.
How is this unconstitutional?
I expect my debate opponents to come here with a working knowledge of the topic. Educate yourself.
Educate all of us. How is this unconstitutional?
Because it’s discriminatory, no different than passing a law that you and only you have to pay a tax.
Why are you holding Walmart to a standard you don’t hold Starbuck’s to?I don’t see you liberals out picketing in front of Starbuck’s demanding better wages or boycotting their crap coffee.And yet the liberal masses that suck Starbucks ass have no problem with employees pay only being $ 9.43 per hour. Go figure.
Because what Walmart does is followed by everyone else.
The issue is Walmart. Please stay on topic.
Starbucks is holding a massive stock buy-back program?
That legislation would be unconstitutional on its face.
Make your point.
He did. Perhaps you should educate yourself on why.
How is this unconstitutional?
It’s targeting a single company.
A company that took government subsidy can't be held to a higher standard?
Maybe the socialist could sell a few of his homes to help the poor.
The issue is stock manipulation, $4 trillion since 2009.
He did. Perhaps you should educate yourself on why.
How is this unconstitutional?
I expect my debate opponents to come here with a working knowledge of the topic. Educate yourself.
Educate all of us. How is this unconstitutional?
Because it’s discriminatory, no different than passing a law that you and only you have to pay a tax.
Doesn't the act cover all large and medium size businesses?
Why are you holding Walmart to a standard you don’t hold Starbuck’s to?I don’t see you liberals out picketing in front of Starbuck’s demanding better wages or boycotting their crap coffee.Because what Walmart does is followed by everyone else.
The issue is Walmart. Please stay on topic.
Starbucks is holding a massive stock buy-back program?
$20,000,000,000 worth.
Starbucks Accelerates Buybacks, Targets $20 Billion Cash Returns
Basically, what these leftists are saying is that Walmart should transfer its profits to its workers.
Well, it's the OP who is derailing his own thread.Who is running the student loan racket, comrade?Student loan debt is a $1.5 Trillion dollar detriment to the US economy.
That's a big problem, off-topic in this thread, though.
Equivalent to a Walmart tariff that consumers will ultimately pay. You know, those middle class and poor customers?
Make an argument that Walmart can't afford to raise pay and buy-back stock while never touching their prices.
Make an argument that Walmart can't afford to raise pay
Create your own WalMart, pay as much as you'd like.
Let me know when your IPO is ready.
That's not an argument, that's bloviating.
You make it sound easy to create a WalMart and pay an arbitrary wage.
Is it?
Make your point.
He did. Perhaps you should educate yourself on why.
How is this unconstitutional?
It’s targeting a single company.
A company that took government subsidy can't be held to a higher standard?
Irrelevant.
What subsidy did they take?
The years 2013 to 2015 were during the BushCo economic crash recovery. Much different today.
The issue is Walmart, NOT one-size-fits-all.
Did you bother to read your own article idiot? This applies to all big to medium size corporations. Not just Walmart.
My issue is Walmart. But the fact remains that there aren't any companies that can't afford to pay a $15.00 an hour minimum wage.
You're lying.
He did. Perhaps you should educate yourself on why.
How is this unconstitutional?
It’s targeting a single company.
A company that took government subsidy can't be held to a higher standard?
Irrelevant.
What subsidy did they take?
You're kidding I hope.
Maybe the socialist could sell a few of his homes to help the poor.
The issue is stock manipulation, $4 trillion since 2009.
$4 trillion hasn’t been returned to shareholders. Sorry.
The years 2013 to 2015 were during the BushCo economic crash recovery. Much different today.
The issue is Walmart, NOT one-size-fits-all.
Did you bother to read your own article idiot? This applies to all big to medium size corporations. Not just Walmart.
My issue is Walmart. But the fact remains that there aren't any companies that can't afford to pay a $15.00 an hour minimum wage.
You're lying.
Prove it.
Maybe the socialist could sell a few of his homes to help the poor.
The issue is stock manipulation, $4 trillion since 2009.
$4 trillion hasn’t been returned to shareholders. Sorry.
Do the math.
Starbucks is holding a massive stock buy-back program?
Why is it called The Walmart Act?
A company that took government subsidy can't be held to a higher standard?
