jehanne1431
Diamond Member
- Nov 7, 2018
- 1,238
- 1,182
- 1,940
LA, I am not contesting anything you are saying. But neither am I as adamant as you seem to be about the refs being biased in these big games. All I am saying is the way the rules now are, the chance of making a horrendous pass interference or no pass interference call, or a holding or no holding call, is always there and that is all it takes to decide a game. They need to allow those calls to be challenged even if it's a judgment call. At least it woiuld eliminate what we saw today or the no-call against the Rams when they glaringly interfered with the Saint in that NFC championship game. I wasn't cheering for Philly, I just hate winning or losing that way.You must be talking about the bengals chiefs game no doubt because thst sure did not happen in this Super Bowl.the chiefs won despite the fact the refs did everything they could to give this game to the eagles,they had to compete with the refs as well to win this game so the chiefs deserved to win this.this is the second year in a row the outcome of the game did not go the way the refs wanted.they did everything they could to give the game to the bengals in the Super Bowl last year and they still could beat the rams,this year same thing,refs did everything on the planet to give this game to the eagles and they STILL could not win the game.in this game the chiefs deserved to win because just like the rams in last years Super Bowl,they also had to compete with the refs to win the game.