Supreme Court Nominee Admits She Gave Pedophiles Lighter Sentences Because Internet Makes It 'So Easy'

I don't get why she thinks technology matters with respect to pornography and pedophilia? What's the connection with the crime of pedophilia and whether the perp uses pornography? A crime has been committed and there is a punishment established which was a minimum of 5 years. Why does a judge get to change the law because the perp had more access to child porn? What does one have to do with the other? See, this problem that libs have with the Constitution came out with John Cornyn's questioning when she threw in the word "substantive" due process. Substantive does not exist in the constitution. It's a word libs throw in so they could legislate from the bench. He was questioning about same-sex marriage but this same word is being used for her reasoning about pedophiles. The law (government) was too harsh with respect to the pedophile because he couldn't control his brain because of all the pornography available these days on the internet. Complete Bullcrap! But, this is the liberal mind today.
Not quite correct. Due process can be “procedural” such as getting a right to a hearing and maybe discovery and time constraints and things of that nature. It is distinguished from substantive due process.


Substantive due process​

Primary tabs​

Substantive due process is the notion that due process not only protects certain legal procedures, but also protects certain rights unrelated to procedure.
Many legal scholars argue that the words “due process” suggest a concern with procedure rather than substance. Justice Clarence Thomas, one of this theory's most well-noted supporters, argued this point when he wrote that "the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause is not a secret repository of substantive guarantees against unfairness"--understand the Due Process Clause. However, others believe that the Due Process Clause does include protections of substantive due process--such as Justice Stephen J. Field, who, in a dissenting opinion to the Slaughterhouse Cases wrote that "the Due Process Clause protected individuals from state legislation that infringed upon their “privileges and immunities” under the federal Constitution. Field’s dissenting opinion is often seen as an important step toward the modern doctrine of substantive due process, a theory that the Court has developed to defend rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution."

— excerpt from Substantive due process
 
It looks like pedos got special Congressional attention because of the multiplied dangers of a secretive community of pervs using the mails to conceal their interests. But now, given much easier access to kiddie porn, that special attention is no longer as pressing, in her estimation, because the pedos can get the kiddie porn material quite a bit more easily than having to be in a secret group with other pedos.

Again, I may not be tracking her thought process very well.
Unbelievable! What thought process? It's easier now to get porn so the perps need to serve less jail time? I'd think it should be the other way around. The maximum for using more porn, not less time. Good grief! How does the liberal Democrat brain think? Screws are loose or missing.
 
Not quite correct. Due process can be “procedural” such as getting a right to a hearing and maybe discovery and time constraints and things of that nature. It is distinguished from substantive due process.
Correct. And Due Process is in the Constitution 14th amendment and 5th for that matter. But, Substantive is not. Procedural is. Is it not? Substantive allows to insert personal beliefs or political leanings into the decisions instead of just deciding outcomes based on the laws written in the Constitution.
 
It looks like pedos got special Congressional attention because of the multiplied dangers of a secretive community of pervs using the mails to conceal their interests. But now, given much easier access to kiddie porn, that special attention is no longer as pressing, in her estimation, because the pedos can get the kiddie porn material quite a bit more easily than having to be in a secret group with other pedos.

Again, I may not be tracking her thought process very well.
They are infiltrating the schools.
 
The problem is many liberals don't see a big problem with child porn, think it is a victimless crime. They don't understand that in the making of the pictures, a child has to be abused, and if there were no demand for it there would be no industry. Some of this stuff is so sick it is unspeakable here.
 
The problem is many liberals don't see a big problem with child porn, think it is a victimless crime. They don't understand that in the making of the pictures, a child has to be abused, and if there were no demand for it there would be no industry. Some of this stuff is so sick it is unspeakable here.
Oh I know it’s severe more severe than most of these people on here will ever know, admit, accept, etc. Many don’t want to face what’s going on. Soon they won’t have a choice they serioulsy are moving in on children every where. They are coming for the Children and the guns.

You should hear what this docotor said about the jab today omg, it’s will and did forever change the DNA of humans/humanity. It is embedding within the sperm or eggs . THere are so, so many health isuses coming from this thing half the public doesn’t even know a drop about the truth. It’s extremely sickening.

It’s a culling of humanity and it’s being done right under their noses…
 
They are infiltrating the schools.
I am one who believes that anyone who takes advantage of a child’s absolute inability to offer a valid consent and who then has sexual contact with that child deserves to be removed from society for the rest of his life. Prison for life with no parole or execution. Either way would be fine by me. Oh! And then, bury them under the prison.
 

Oh look she admits it, but the ppl with lower brain status can’t figure out that she admits it.
So they will still claim bull s***! LoL.
What Flip Flop Graham changed his mind, again.

Three Republicans voted last year to confirm Jackson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.).


What a spineless coward.
 

Oh look she admits it, but the ppl with lower brain status can’t figure out that she admits it.
So they will still claim bull s***! LoL.
The bullshit that I saw was when Lindsey dumbass Graham asked her an unconstitutional question about her religion. WTF?
 
1648005526788.png
 
You racist hate to see color being added to the Court that was Lily White for decades.
I hate criminals and those that support them period. Same goes for manipulators and idiots. You have all 3 characteristics.

Try your idiotic race card with someone else---I am long past caring if race ho morons call me names or not. Stick and Stones from you idiots means less than nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top