Supreme Court Nominee Admits She Gave Pedophiles Lighter Sentences Because Internet Makes It 'So Easy'

I hate criminals and those that support them period. Same goes for manipulators and idiots. You have all 3 characteristics.

Try your idiotic race card with someone else---I am long past caring if race ho morons call me names or not. Stick and Stones from you idiots means less than nothing.
I listened to a few minutes of this woman on NPR this afternoon

the senator doing the questioning exposed her as a pedophile enabler

she will probably get her lifetime gig but the repubs are quietly scaring her reputation

and its going to stick
 
Correct. And Due Process is in the Constitution 14th amendment and 5th for that matter. But, Substantive is not. Procedural is. Is it not? Substantive allows to insert personal beliefs or political leanings into the decisions instead of just deciding outcomes based on the laws written in the Constitution.
I don’t believe it uses the term “procedural due process.”
 
Because I oppose her for other reasons, I don’t want to be misunderstood here. But the thread headline and the piece quoted are out of sync. Let’s be fair and honest about the judge’s position.

She appears to be contending that the reason to consider pedophiles more dangerous no longer makes as much sense since the availability of kiddie porn is no longer as restricted as it was prior to the internet. (I am not completely clear on why that matters, but she may have a point about how the change in technology has led to disparities in sentencing.)

Making such distinctions, or recognizing them, is part of a judge’s duties.
Only a terminally stupid judge would reach that conclusion based on the available evidence.
 
I hate criminals and those that support them period. Same goes for manipulators and idiots. You have all 3 characteristics.

Try your idiotic race card with someone else---I am long past caring if race ho morons call me names or not. Stick and Stones from you idiots means less than nothing.
Ah Turtleshit, I know you don't care about anybody other than white folks. You have made that clear time and time again. I can understand why you hate yourself, because you are just a crabbie ass, racist POS.
 
I don’t believe it uses the term “procedural due process.”
If the decisions are based solely on the words of the Constitution, Procedural is the only thing that can be done. So, it doesn't have to be in there. But, Substantive does or the words are changed by the changing of the meaning by the judge. For instance, Congress gave judges the time frame incarceration for convictions. Yet, Jackson removed the time frame for convicted Pedos by instead of issuing a 5 year sentence, she gave a perp a two-and-a-half year sentence. She re-wrote the law by doing so. That is abuse of powers.
 
Conservatives are liars and racist scum.

Suuure...say hi to Richard for me.

1648069195239.png
 
If the decisions are based solely on the words of the Constitution, Procedural is the only thing that can be done. So, it doesn't have to be in there. But, Substantive does or the words are changed by the changing of the meaning by the judge. For instance, Congress gave judges the time frame incarceration for convictions. Yet, Jackson removed the time frame for convicted Pedos by instead of issuing a 5 year sentence, she gave a perp a two-and-a-half year sentence. She re-wrote the law by doing so. That is abuse of powers.
The phrase “due process” is Constitutional. “Due Process” likely was considered to mean procedural due process. But there are some rights we have which aren’t premised on procedure. They are deemed to be more substantive.

I know judges are given discretion. I don’t know enough about the case to which you are making reference to form an opinion as to whether she usurped power. Overall, I wouldn’t doubt it. Such behavior is typical of liberals. And she is a liberal.
 

Oh look she admits it, but the ppl with lower brain status can’t figure out that she admits it.
So they will still claim bull s***! LoL.
Ted Cruz......gotta wonder why he's all interested in children's books and children's TV characters......and we all know how this story ends.
 
Ted Cruz......gotta wonder why he's all interested in children's books and children's TV characters......and we all know how this story ends.
To understand why Cruz references those books, you’d have to pay attention. But as things stand, you don’t have a clue — so you offer more of your banality.

OTOH, I think we do know how the story ends. With a new SCOTUS Associate Justice by the name of Ketanji Brown Jackson.
 
The phrase “due process” is Constitutional. “Due Process” likely was considered to mean procedural due process. But there are some rights we have which aren’t premised on procedure. They are deemed to be more substantive.

I know judges are given discretion. I don’t know enough about the case to which you are making reference to form an opinion as to whether she usurped power. Overall, I wouldn’t doubt it. Such behavior is typical of liberals. And she is a liberal.
Which ones do you think are substantive rather than procedure in the Constitution Bill of Rights?
 
Which ones do you think are substantive rather than procedure in the Constitution Bill of Rights?
The rights to Freedom of speech, of assembly, of religion. At least in part I’d say the right to bear arms. I’d say the right to remain silent is substantive. The right to counsel is substantive. Etc.
 
The rights to Freedom of speech, of assembly, of religion. At least in part I’d say the right to bear arms. I’d say the right to remain silent is substantive. The right to counsel is substantive. Etc.
I'd say that none of them are substantive. But, instead of taking them as they are written, very cleanly I would say, that liberals have made it a mission of theirs to muddle what they are. The legislatures and Congress have the right to clarify. Or at least, try to. But, judges are simply to judge on the laws in each state and federal government. Not to clarify themselves or decide what they mean.
 
What is it with Dems and pedophilia?? Just today. Top Maine Dem who ran for Gov and lost by a hair to a repunk.....home was raided and he admitted to his wife in front of the so called agents that the 'agents' would find child porn on his electronic devices. Elliot Cutler. Will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
 
It doesn't matter if you keep 5 pictures or 5000 pictures. It doesn't matter if they are physical prints or digital ones. Child porn is child porn and anyone convicted or child porn should be taken out back and shot in the head.

Out of all the dumb shit she has said, trying to reason child porn is the most evil and heinous shit she has said. That alone should make her unfit to even be a circuit court judge.

I had something happen to me as a kid and maybe that makes me harsher than I should be I don't know. But all child sex offenders should be killed. I have no mercy for them at all. If they need a volunteer to pull the trigger I'd gladly do it and I'll even supply my own gun and ammunition.
 

Forum List

Back
Top