Chillicothe
Platinum Member
- Feb 14, 2021
- 10,887
- 6,975
- 938
The following reportage was posted up in a recent very long thread; however, I think it has the legs to stand on its own. Most especially, as this 'insurrection' issue has been circulating with several states' attemp bar Don Trump from the POTUS ballot....or likely, from any elective office whatsoever.
So this Supreme Court ruling must be considered as part of that whole matrix.
"Speaking of January 6th.
Well, the Supremes just made a notable ruling.
They declined to hear a case brought by a New Mexico county commissioner who was unhappy for being removed from his position for his participation in January 6th Jackassery at the Capitol.
Here's reportage:
"In a decisive move that may have repercussions for other state and local officials embroiled in the fallout from the January 6th Capitol attack, the Supreme Court declined to take up the appeal of Couy Griffin, co-founder of “Cowboys for Trump” and former Otero County Commissioner, effectively endorsing his removal from office. Griffin’s removal was due to his involvement in the January 6 insurrection, as concluded by New Mexico’s judicial system under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment—a provision that disqualifies individuals from holding office if they engage in insurrection against the United States.
So this Supreme Court ruling must be considered as part of that whole matrix.
"Speaking of January 6th.
Well, the Supremes just made a notable ruling.
They declined to hear a case brought by a New Mexico county commissioner who was unhappy for being removed from his position for his participation in January 6th Jackassery at the Capitol.
Here's reportage:
"In a decisive move that may have repercussions for other state and local officials embroiled in the fallout from the January 6th Capitol attack, the Supreme Court declined to take up the appeal of Couy Griffin, co-founder of “Cowboys for Trump” and former Otero County Commissioner, effectively endorsing his removal from office. Griffin’s removal was due to his involvement in the January 6 insurrection, as concluded by New Mexico’s judicial system under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment—a provision that disqualifies individuals from holding office if they engage in insurrection against the United States.
Attachments
Last edited: