Beyond the New Pelosi J6 Admission – It’s What She Said Behind Closed Doors That’s Chilling!


Such as?????????? They may be antithetical to your aspirations for America but more than half the country disagrees with it.

Easy, probably one of her worst policies. Pelosi, along with other dems, routinely called for reducing home lending standards to achieve political goals contributing to the eventual collapse of the financial market. She orchestrated what essentially amounted to a cover up to hide the govts role in the crash.
 
yes it was.....an insurrection is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.....did that not happen?...the thing that did not happen was a coup as so many lefties claimed happened........

So every protest is an insurrection then.
 
Nancy is not in charge of the National Guard.

Nancy wasn't informed that an armed mob was descending on the capitol build, that what the President knew and did nothing about..

This is more disinformation provided by the MAGA...

Didn't you say you lived in Ireland? No one cares what you think about American politics.
 
No, there was no insurrection. That was just liberal fantasy and laughable at best.

There was no insurrection but dems do hate this country to the core and will kill the populace if it furthers their agenda. They are an evil group.
Thanks for your motive...

You call Democrats evil and that justifies (in your head) to over throw the government... You believe you are fighting evil, so that justifies their actions..
You have justified deception as you are fighting evil. You think Democrats will commit mass murder and you are trying to say that you were not trying to overthrow them...

So you are trying to say that you were playing all nice with mass murders who were out to destroy America...
 
“Insurrection” lead by Ray “the Fed” Epps, Chris Wray & Co
1724936322614.png
 
Thanks for your motive...

You call Democrats evil and that justifies (in your head) to over throw the government... You believe you are fighting evil, so that justifies their actions..
You have justified deception as you are fighting evil. You think Democrats will commit mass murder and you are trying to say that you were not trying to overthrow them...

So you are trying to say that you were playing all nice with mass murders who were out to destroy America...

No, not what I said. Your synapses are firing incorrectly and backwards.
 
Thanks for your motive...

You call Democrats evil and that justifies (in your head) to over throw the government... You believe you are fighting evil, so that justifies their actions..
You have justified deception as you are fighting evil. You think Democrats will commit mass murder and you are trying to say that you were not trying to overthrow them...

So you are trying to say that you were playing all nice with mass murders who were out to destroy America...

He never said anything about a justification for overthrowing the government. 🤡 Do you speak English in Ireland?

You have no idea what reality is here, you don't live here, worry about your own country's politics and stay out of ours.
 
So every protest is an insurrection then.
Something many fail to consider is that this country was founded on insurrection. a minority group (John Adams estimated that there was about 1/3 support for it from the population) violently attacked and overthrew the government of the day. Today, the democrats would call them a violent fringe group that needs to be arrested and prosecuted for treason. There would be calls for everyone to look for these extremists and turn them over to the authorities for prosecution.
 
Something many fail to consider is that this country was founded on insurrection. a minority group (John Adams estimated that there was about 1/3 support for it from the population) violently attacked and overthrew the government of the day. Today, the democrats would call them a violent fringe group that needs to be arrested and prosecuted for treason. There would be calls for everyone to look for these extremists and turn them over to the authorities for prosecution.

Absolutely. They'd also be appalled at what this country has turned into with a federal government completely out of control.
 
Absolutely. They'd also be appalled at what this country has turned into with a federal government completely out of control.
They would probably take to the streets, social media and every camera they could find, fomenting revolution. They'd be imprisoned in short order, and that's very sad. No government should be totally free of worrying about being overthrown by a ticked off population.
 
If Nancy would have had the National Guard there, there would NOT HAVE BEEN A CAPITOL RIOT.
If Trump had not told the BIG LIE of the election being stolen and incited his followers, there would not have been a Capitol riot.

If trump had legally gotten a permit for the March sending his followers down to the Capitol, there would not have been a Capitol riot.

If Trump had not rescheduled his rally from another day to the Jan 6th date, then there would not have been a Capitol riot.

See how that works?
 
Easy, probably one of her worst policies. Pelosi, along with other dems, routinely called for reducing home lending standards to achieve political goals contributing to the eventual collapse of the financial market. She orchestrated what essentially amounted to a cover up to hide the govts role in the crash.
A couple of things about that. At that period of time new mortgage companies were springing up offering no doc loans. A development having nothing to do with Pelosi since they were not selling the mortgages to government backed agencies like Fannie and Freddie. They were bundling the mortgages in to RMBS's and selling them as AAA rated bonds to the investment community. That's how they recapitalized themselves.
Secondly, have you ever heard of Bush's "Ownership Society" initiative. He was promoting the idea that mortgage companies come up with creative ways to give financing to people who did not previously qualify for a mortgage based on conventional standards.

There are plenty of culprits, like lenders who peddled easy credit, consumers who took on mortgages they could not afford and Wall Street chieftains who loaded up on mortgage-backed securities without regard to the risk.

But the story of how the United States got here is partly one of Bush's own making, according to a review of his tenure that included interviews with dozens of current and former administration officials.

From his earliest days in office, Bush paired his belief that Americans do best when they own their own homes with his conviction that markets do best when left alone. Bush pushed hard to expand home ownership, especially among minority groups, an initiative that dovetailed with both his ambition to expand Republican appeal and the business interests of some of his biggest donors. But his housing policies and hands-off approach to regulation encouraged lax lending standards.


So Much for Bush's 'Ownership Society'​

 
A couple of things about that. At that period of time new mortgage companies were springing up offering no doc loans. A development having nothing to do with Pelosi since they were not selling the mortgages to government backed agencies like Fannie and Freddie. They were bundling the mortgages in to RMBS's and selling them as AAA rated bonds to the investment community. That's how they recapitalized themselves.
Secondly, have you ever heard of Bush's "Ownership Society" initiative. He was promoting the idea that mortgage companies come up with creative ways to give financing to people who did not previously qualify for a mortgage based on conventional standards.

There are plenty of culprits, like lenders who peddled easy credit, consumers who took on mortgages they could not afford and Wall Street chieftains who loaded up on mortgage-backed securities without regard to the risk.

But the story of how the United States got here is partly one of Bush's own making, according to a review of his tenure that included interviews with dozens of current and former administration officials.

From his earliest days in office, Bush paired his belief that Americans do best when they own their own homes with his conviction that markets do best when left alone. Bush pushed hard to expand home ownership, especially among minority groups, an initiative that dovetailed with both his ambition to expand Republican appeal and the business interests of some of his biggest donors. But his housing policies and hands-off approach to regulation encouraged lax lending standards.


So Much for Bush's 'Ownership Society'​


Bush has some of that blame but that loose borrowing started under clinton.
 
Bush has some of that blame but that loose borrowing started under clinton.
Make up your mind. First you blamed Pelosi and now you blame Clinton. Clinton is at fault for the repeal of Glass Steagall which allowed for the combination of commercial and investment banking. But Bush was asleep at the wheel while the housing bubble inflated because housing was such a big economic driver for the economy and he didn't want to put the brakes on.

In any event Pelosi was no more to blame for the housing debacle than she was for Jan. 6. None.

You don't hear Dems saying Bush hates America for his role in the financial collapse do you?
 
Make up your mind. First you blamed Pelosi and now you blame Clinton. Clinton is at fault for the repeal of Glass Steagall which allowed for the combination of commercial and investment banking. But Bush was asleep at the wheel while the housing bubble inflated because housing was such a big economic driver for the economy and he didn't want to put the brakes on.

In any event Pelosi was no more to blame for the housing debacle than she was for Jan. 6. None.

You don't hear Dems saying Bush hates America for his role in the financial collapse do you?

Yeah she was. See, I can blame both of these worthless parties. You can't because you choose to be a hack for the libs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top