Syria rebel coalition rejects Russia chemical weapons handover proposalSeptember 12,

So what? The US supports Al Qaeda terrorists in Syria. It seems all nations support somebodys terrorism somewhere in the world. The US drone attacks are themselves acts of terrorism that have killed hundreds of children.

No we don't. We have them on our list of terrorist organizations. I also disagree with your stance on drones, but that's another thread.
 

And what do you mean "so what"? The "so what" is that it is naive to ignore the realities of situations simply because you don't like violence. Your insistence for "diplomacy" is literally laughable at this point in the conflict, and as a means of dealing with Al Qaeda.

You have never offered a workable alternative to countering Al Qaeda in Syria. I'm not a big fan of conflict either, but you aren't offering any counter suggestions or pragmatic rationales for them.
 
Last edited:
When Syria surrenders it's chemical weapons, any further chemical attacks will be from the American backed Al-quiada "rebels"

We don't back Al Qaeda in Syria. That has long been a fallacy, and its a pretty dishonest representation of the complexities of the Syrian opposition.

Well you can't blame some of the folks.

After all, America, under Ronald "The Traitor" Reagan, did give chemtech and ingredients to Iraq to use against Iran.

actually it was Frans van Anraat that sold the chemicals to saddam
 
We don't back Al Qaeda in Syria. That has long been a fallacy, and its a pretty dishonest representation of the complexities of the Syrian opposition.

Well you can't blame some of the folks.

After all, America, under Ronald "The Traitor" Reagan, did give chemtech and ingredients to Iraq to use against Iran.

actually it was Frans van Anraat that sold the chemicals to saddam

US companies sold components Saddam used to make chemical weapons and government agencies approved the sales.
 
McCain's Arab Islamist Marauders are hanging in there but they're not happy.

Publicly, the Saudis expressed patience, with pro-monarchy newspapers saying that the negotiations over Syrian chemical weapons would probably founder and that American military strikes would follow sooner or later. But behind the scenes, analysts say, leaders in Saudi Arabia and allies like Qatar chafed as rebel leaders fumed that their larger need — a way to shift the balance in the two-year-old civil war and end the army’s bombardment of towns and neighborhoods — was being ignored.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/13/w...a-is-stepping-up-weapons-deliveries.html?_r=0

bold is mine
 

Forum List

Back
Top