Syrian Army defends Tabqa airport, smashes hundreds of IS terrorists

[aris2chat]

Go team Sunni !! ..

a thumbs up to terrorists and brutal killers? Really? pathetic

 

[Bleipriester]

Israel has always been accused of keeping its borders ambiguous, to say the least, but I don't think it could tolerate a hostile force in the Golan. So far, however, Israel and IS haven't displayed any hostility towards one another. I'm starting to wonder if anyone has a clue where the ME is heading.

If it is the IS or not. Gunmen appeared from nothing on the Golan Heights this year and there was Israeli fire towards Syria.

 

[Bleipriester]

Yet there are reports the US is supplying Assad's forces with intelligence on where to strike IS's leaders...Anybody got a scorecard?

The US said that there are recon missions alongside the border but US planes don't enter Syrian airspace in fear of the SAA's airdefense

 

[Bleipriester]

There is something going on about the airport, something secret, that would not be advantagous if published now, ForMotherSyria said. The page owner promised to deliver infos later. Hopefully, it is an operation to retake the airport. However, the soldiers and equipment were evacuated. Unfortunately, there is a report telling that about 150 soldiers were captured by the murderous terrorists.

 

[georgephillip]

Israel has always been accused of keeping its borders ambiguous, to say the least, but I don't think it could tolerate a hostile force in the Golan. So far, however, Israel and IS haven't displayed any hostility towards one another. I'm starting to wonder if anyone has a clue where the ME is heading.

If it is the IS or not. Gunmen appeared from nothing on the Golan Heights this year and there was Israeli fire towards Syria.

Which goes back to Israel's ambiguous borders. In the 1980s a long term plan was put forward by Oded Yinon which sought to guarantee the Jewish state's long term stability:

"The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional
power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all
existing Arab states.

"Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state.

"Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and, ironically, its
source of moral legitimation.

From the Nile to the Euphrates?

http://syria360.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east.pdf

 

[Bleipriester]

Which goes back to Israel's ambiguous borders. In the 1980s a long term plan was put forward by Oded Yinon which sought to guarantee the Jewish state's long term stability:

"The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional
power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all
existing Arab states.

"Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state.

"Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and, ironically, its
source of moral legitimation.

From the Nile to the Euphrates?

http://syria360.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east.pdf

Big dreams of a small country. But I don't believe that the Israeli population would support this plan if it was announced by the government. The plan means endless conflicts.

 

[georgephillip]

Which goes back to Israel's ambiguous borders. In the 1980s a long term plan was put forward by Oded Yinon which sought to guarantee the Jewish state's long term stability:

"The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional
power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all
existing Arab states.

"Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state.

"Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and, ironically, its
source of moral legitimation.

From the Nile to the Euphrates?

http://syria360.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east.pdf

Big dreams of a small country. But I don't believe that the Israeli population would support this plan if it was announced by the government. The plan means endless conflicts.

Endless conflicts make a lot of money for a few and create mass misery for the many. From the Nile to the Euphrates starts with an alliance between elites in Tel Aviv and Cairo, which already is crucifying Gaza on behalf of Jewish colonialism. Israeli elites would prefer dealing with sectarian statelets instead of sovereign states like Iraq and Syria.

 

[dilloduck]

Very similar to the neocon plan Clean Break.

A Clean Break A New Strategy for Securing the Realm - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[georgephillip]

Very similar to the neocon plan Clean Break.

A Clean Break A New Strategy for Securing the Realm - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the 'Clean Break' report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel.[1] The report explained a new approach to solving Israel's security problems in the Middle Eastwith an emphasis on 'Western values'.

"It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting their possession of 'weapons of mass destruction'.

"The polices set forth in the paper were never adopted by the Israeli government."

A Clean Break A New Strategy for Securing the Realm - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[irosie91]

Feels like Obama is hoping they take out Assad for him.

There is not one doubt in my mind that Obama and other western leaders were praying that these bastards could go for a two for one and get Assad and Maliki.

Herein lies the Achilles heel. They have now unleashed ISIS on all of us.

dancer-----I agree with you (try not to swoon) We have gone and done it again ----TRIED to ally with meccaists. We made
that mistake in Afghanistan----(with our idiot alliance with the
Caliphatist TALIBAN) The Syrian army fight with Isis---is just
one caliphatist sect fighting with another caliphatist sect-------they
are both the same kharah ----just of a different color.
(kharah of a different color)

Assad is a BAATHIST as was Sadaam , as was Gamel Abdel
Nasser ----------------CALIPHATISTS .....all

for those who do not know----the agenda of BAATHISM----
is a UNIVERSAL ARAB CALIPHATE -----in fact it is a
"NATIONALIST SOCIALIST MOVEMENT"
(like Nazism)

AL HUSSEINI ------grand mufti ---ally of adolf hitler was
a BAATHIST------Gamel Abdel Hitler and ARAFART
were his direct followers

need I be more clear?----BAATHISM = NAZISM = CALIPHATISM
but different brances fight with each other

well-----Isis is simply a different sect with but with a PARALLEL
agenda. The fight between Isis and the
Syrian military is no less Islamic than is
the fight between Shiites and Sunnis----
it is "internecine"

 

[Bleipriester]

dancer-----I agree with you (try not to swoon) We have gone and done it again ----TRIED to ally with meccaists. We made
that mistake in Afghanistan----(with our idiot alliance with the
Caliphatist TALIBAN) The Syrian army fight with Isis---is just
one caliphatist sect fighting with another caliphatist sect-------they
are both the same kharah ----just of a different color.
(kharah of a different color)

Assad is a BAATHIST as was Sadaam , as was Gamel Abdel
Nasser ----------------CALIPHATISTS .....all

for those who do not know----the agenda of BAATHISM----
is a UNIVERSAL ARAB CALIPHATE -----in fact it is a
"NATIONALIST SOCIALIST MOVEMENT"
(like Nazism)

AL HUSSEINI ------grand mufti ---ally of adolf hitler was
a BAATHIST------Gamel Abdel Hitler and ARAFART
were his direct followers

need I be more clear?----BAATHISM = NAZISM = CALIPHATISM
but different brances fight with each other

well-----Isis is simply a different sect with but with a PARALLEL
agenda. The fight between Isis and the
Syrian military is no less Islamic than is
the fight between Shiites and Sunnis----
it is "internecine"

Come on. The Arab unity has failed long ago when the Syrian-Egyptian state broke into two again. And the Iraqi and the Syrian Baath parties were not exactly friends. Furthermore, the Baath ideology has nothing to do with Hitler or Caliphates but is based on the values the West claims to represent. Syria for example manages to govern a population with large differences. You won't find another place where different views and religions exist together that peaceful, though this has been destroyed by the Western support for religious extremists, who now spread death, rape and torture where ever they are. But I am sure, that this Syrian achievement will be reached again, the more so as the extremists are gone or dutifully (again) then.

 

[irosie91]

dancer-----I agree with you (try not to swoon) We have gone and done it again ----TRIED to ally with meccaists. We made
that mistake in Afghanistan----(with our idiot alliance with the
Caliphatist TALIBAN) The Syrian army fight with Isis---is just
one caliphatist sect fighting with another caliphatist sect-------they
are both the same kharah ----just of a different color.
(kharah of a different color)

Assad is a BAATHIST as was Sadaam , as was Gamel Abdel
Nasser ----------------CALIPHATISTS .....all

for those who do not know----the agenda of BAATHISM----
is a UNIVERSAL ARAB CALIPHATE -----in fact it is a
"NATIONALIST SOCIALIST MOVEMENT"
(like Nazism)

AL HUSSEINI ------grand mufti ---ally of adolf hitler was
a BAATHIST------Gamel Abdel Hitler and ARAFART
were his direct followers

need I be more clear?----BAATHISM = NAZISM = CALIPHATISM
but different brances fight with each other

well-----Isis is simply a different sect with but with a PARALLEL
agenda. The fight between Isis and the
Syrian military is no less Islamic than is
the fight between Shiites and Sunnis----
it is "internecine"

Come on. The Arab unity has failed long ago when the Syrian-Egyptian state broke into two again. And the Iraqi and the Syrian Baath parties were not exactly friends. Furthermore, the Baath ideology has nothing to do with Hitler or Caliphates but is based on the values the West claims to represent. Syria for example manages to govern a population with large differences. You won't find another place where different views and religions exist together that peaceful, though this has been destroyed by the Western support for religious extremists, who now spread death, rape and torture where ever they are. But I am sure, that this Syrian achievement will be reached again, the more so as the extremists are gone or dutifully (again) then.

thanks for the LAUGH priester---------now try to be honest for a CHANGE-----BAATHISM is ARABISM/ISLAMICISM----
------of course the Baathist pigs fart out 'we are the most
"tolerant" -----as did the filthy rapist pig of mecca-----same
"toleration" --------LOL----"toleration" I first heard that word
from a muslim from southeast asia--------he also touted the
"toleration" of the filth of shariah ------the most
TOLERATION ---the MOGHUL EMPIRE also had
**** THE MOST TOLERATION*****

you write as if you attended a madrassa
kindergarten

 

[Bleipriester]

thanks for the LAUGH priester---------now try to be honest for a CHANGE-----BAATHISM is ARABISM/ISLAMICISM----
------of course the Baathist pigs fart out 'we are the most
"tolerant" -----as did the filthy rapist pig of mecca-----same
"toleration" --------LOL----"toleration" I first heard that word
from a muslim from southeast asia--------he also touted the
"toleration" of the filth of shariah ------the most
TOLERATION ---the MOGHUL EMPIRE also had
**** THE MOST TOLERATION*****

you write as if you attended a madrassa
kindergarten

Funny how quick tolerance becomes a bad term, if the "wrong" guys use it. And as you can see, in Syria, tolerance for islamist extremists doesn't exist.

 

[Ropey]

Go team Sunni !! ..

a thumbs up to terrorists and brutal killers? Really? pathetic

What I find strange is that Shia are now supporting Sunni (Hamas) while they kill them in Syria/Iraq.

Boy, these Sunni are really messed up. I don't see any Sunni supporting Shia while killing Shia but I do see Shia supporting Sunni while killing Sunni.

^It's a strange thing to see happening, in all the Shia/Sunni battles during the last ~1400 years this has never been documented, and for some reason Sunni Man can't say why that's happening. I'd surely like to know because it's like he's also saying:

"Go Team Shia" as well.



@Sunni Man