- Moderator
- #81
What specific criminal statute did he violate?You’re defending the criminal conduct of Biden and the corrupt DOJ that runs interference for him as they did for his lowlife kid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What specific criminal statute did he violate?You’re defending the criminal conduct of Biden and the corrupt DOJ that runs interference for him as they did for his lowlife kid.
Mmmh…wait….Trump had boxes of documents in his bathroom, in a closet, strewn about his office in Maralago and other locations. No safe.
But you are right, the rich and powerful get away with it.
3) Hur didn't think he could prove intent.
I choose 3.
All Swamp Launder money, and use insider info for trading. Why they are millionaires.You’re defending the criminal conduct of Biden and the corrupt DOJ that runs interference for him as they did for his lowlife kid.
All Swamp Launder money, and use insider info for trading. Why they are millionaires.
View attachment 916369
Oh my.Mmmm, spam the thread with “… but, but, but what about Trump”
Read the thread title.
18 U.S. Code § 1924
Oh? Got a link stating that?What came out of the Hur testimony was that Biden had a book deal in the works and he was using the classified documents as an ego boost to impress the ghost writer.
Oh my.
Whether or not it is a crime depends on ”knowingly” and “intent”. Hur has already stated he can’t prove intent based on the evidence.
Oh? Got a link stating that?
So Joe ACCIDENTALLY kept tens of thousands of secret documents in his filing cabinet?
In the article you just mentioned, hur says he actually did find evidence of willful retention, but the idea that it was one of 3 parts of the criminal element that he couldn’t prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He never says the intent is not there, he says the opposite, actually.Here is what he said:
“I need to disagree with at least one thing that you said, which is that I found that all of the elements were met,” Hur replied. “One of the elements of the relevant mishandling statute is the intent element. And what my report reflects is my judgment that based on the evidence, I would not be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury that that intent element had been met.”
Oh? Got a link stating that?
From the report...misc pieces regarding intent.
Note the final paragraph from Hur's report.
And his cooperation with our investigation, including by reporting to the government that the Afghanistan documents were in his Delaware garage, will likely convince some jurors that he made an innocent mistake, rather than acting willfully-that is, with intent to break the law-as the statute requires.
Finally, because Section 1924 requires that a defendant "knowingly remove[d]" classified information "without authority and with the intent to retain [it] at an unauthorized location," a prosecution under this statute would face many of the same evidentiary hurdles discussed in Chapters Eleven and Twelv
It
Biden was mistaken in his legal judgment is not enough to prove he acted willfully, which requires intent to do something the law forbids. 924 The defense will buttress these claims by contending that other credible authorities, including at least one former president and the Department of Justice, also have concluded that a former president may keep handwritten notes even if they contain classified information.
The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr.
Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts. Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.
Document Viewer : NPR
apps.npr.org
Biden was mistaken in his legal judgment is not enough to prove he acted willfully,
Irony.![]()
You folks are so incredibly ignorant. Too ignorant to even understand why I say that.How do you unintentionally serially steal classified documents from a SCIF over decades, Moron?![]()