Tax cuts for the rich, why?

3bp778.jpg
Trickle-down.jpg

~S~
 
Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.


That's just stupid...

Tax cuts for the rich, why?

1) it is their money, they earned it.

2) why should we give more money to a government that already wastes almost all of the money they currently get.

3) money in the hands of the people who actually made it creates more wealth for everyone else.

4) Again........it is their money, they earned it....politicians shouldn't get one penny more than we can keep from them.

Corporations, and the rich really suck at this rate, you'd have to be more than a bit of an idiot to not notice it.

- Facebook & Twitter censoring out the Right Wing opposition.
- MSNBC & CNN pushing the Liberal biased agenda.
- Amazon getting rid of store jobs, and treating their warehouse employees pretty poorly.
- Walmart started a lot of the job outsourcing.
- Ma & Pa firms hiring Illegal Immigrants in mass.

Lets not forget Hollywood, all the manufacturing pushed into China, Mexico, Vietnam, India, etc. by outsourcing.

They'd stop doing all those bad things if we taxed them more, eh?

So, giving Liberal business owners tax cuts, can't help them use their money to increase Liberalism?


It's their money, it's called a "Free Country."

Sure, freedom to hire illegals by the wealthy Capitalists, freedom to outsource manufacturing jobs to China that is hostile to us, freedom to Abortion fetus murder, freedom to sell Illicit drugs, freedom to Prostitution, etc. etc.

Freedom can be very degenerate, and counterproductive.
 
Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.


A) You've obviously not done the math on this one.

B) Only because they have too much power, not too much money.

C) Bubbles have been caused all over the economy, in places like tech, college lending, etcetera...They're caused by easy money landing practices by the the Fed.

You're way out of your element here...Best button it.

Debt is a serious concern.

How about taxing the rich to help bring it down?

Government spending: How rising federal debt, deficit impact Americans

As we’ve already mentioned, rising debt and deficits can lead to higher interest rates. Higher interest rates mean it will cost more to borrow money to buy a house or a car, and paying for college tuition or starting your own business will become more expensive.

Higher interest rates also affect credit card purchases, so expenses like buying gas or groceries or even going on vacation will cost more.
Didn't say it wasn't a serious concern...But you said thet we could merely soak the rich and that would pay it all off...You obviously know absolutely nothing about economics.

Know nothing about economics?

Like Trump?

He's calling for such an idiocy of a Negative interest rate.

Even famed Austrian LIBERTARIAN Nobel prize winning economist Friedrich Hayek, had warned of low interest rates causing boom, and busts, much like what happened under W. Bush.

Even famed Austrian LIBERTARIAN Nobel prize winning economist Friedrich Hayek, had warned of low interest rates causing boom, and busts, much like what happened under W. Bush.

Obama had a Fed Funds under 0.25% for his first 7 years in office, where was his boom?
 
Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.


A) You've obviously not done the math on this one.

B) Only because they have too much power, not too much money.

C) Bubbles have been caused all over the economy, in places like tech, college lending, etcetera...They're caused by easy money landing practices by the the Fed.

You're way out of your element here...Best button it.

Debt is a serious concern.

How about taxing the rich to help bring it down?

Government spending: How rising federal debt, deficit impact Americans

As we’ve already mentioned, rising debt and deficits can lead to higher interest rates. Higher interest rates mean it will cost more to borrow money to buy a house or a car, and paying for college tuition or starting your own business will become more expensive.

Higher interest rates also affect credit card purchases, so expenses like buying gas or groceries or even going on vacation will cost more.
Didn't say it wasn't a serious concern...But you said thet we could merely soak the rich and that would pay it all off...You obviously know absolutely nothing about economics.

Know nothing about economics?

Like Trump?

He's calling for such an idiocy of a Negative interest rate.

Even famed Austrian LIBERTARIAN Nobel prize winning economist Friedrich Hayek, had warned of low interest rates causing boom, and busts, much like what happened under W. Bush.

Even famed Austrian LIBERTARIAN Nobel prize winning economist Friedrich Hayek, had warned of low interest rates causing boom, and busts, much like what happened under W. Bush.

Obama had a Fed Funds under 0.25% for his first 7 years in office, where was his boom?

The economy fell apart under Dumbya Bush.
 
Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

What rate would "completely get rid of the debt"?

The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush.

The poor and middle class didn't buy houses?

It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.

When I eventually sell my house, I would benefit when the rich compete to buy it.

A massive increase in property values, isn't usually so great.... Property taxes go up, and new buyers will struggle.

A massive increase in property values, isn't usually so great...

I prefer an increase in my property values to a decrease.
What about you?
 
The typical American Dream for the Middle Class is to be rich ... so why would the Middle Class want to restrict the privileges of being rich? ... you're stuck on a desert island with Ginger or Maryann, you gonna tell her to be celibate? ... yeah, sure you would, I believe you ... [shakes head] ...

The tax reform back in 1986 was okay ... but every Congress since has added loopholes and train tunnels in the law all in favor of their corporate sponsors ... 35 years later it's a complete mess, and no point in reforming it again because, well, Congress ...

It's a flaw in the US Constitution ... the fix for this problem can only be initiated by those with the most to lose by fixing the problem ... so it ain't going to happen ... tear up the Constitution and make ourselves the personal property of Queen Elizabeth II ...
 
Most Americans should be united here.

Even Republicans.

Because.

A.) By taxing huge portions of the richest individuals pockets, could completely get rid of the debt.

B.) The rich are the ones largely, if not entirely responsible for Liberal decay, like Illegals being hired, Jobs outsourced, Porn industry, Illicit drug dealer kingpins, Hollywood, Media, Facebook, Google, and yada, yada.

C.) The rich investment in housing, tends to cause bubbles, like which happened W. Bush. It actually hurts the middle class, when rich compete & up the bids on properties.


That's just stupid...

Tax cuts for the rich, why?

1) it is their money, they earned it.

2) why should we give more money to a government that already wastes almost all of the money they currently get.

3) money in the hands of the people who actually made it creates more wealth for everyone else.

4) Again........it is their money, they earned it....politicians shouldn't get one penny more than we can keep from them.

Corporations, and the rich really suck at this rate, you'd have to be more than a bit of an idiot to not notice it.

- Facebook & Twitter censoring out the Right Wing opposition.
- MSNBC & CNN pushing the Liberal biased agenda.
- Amazon getting rid of store jobs, and treating their warehouse employees pretty poorly.
- Walmart started a lot of the job outsourcing.
- Ma & Pa firms hiring Illegal Immigrants in mass.

Lets not forget Hollywood, all the manufacturing pushed into China, Mexico, Vietnam, India, etc. by outsourcing.

They'd stop doing all those bad things if we taxed them more, eh?

So, giving Liberal business owners tax cuts, can't help them use their money to increase Liberalism?

You want to tax people, because you don't like what they'll do with their own money?

Nice!
 
A) You've obviously not done the math on this one.

B) Only because they have too much power, not too much money.

C) Bubbles have been caused all over the economy, in places like tech, college lending, etcetera...They're caused by easy money landing practices by the the Fed.

You're way out of your element here...Best button it.

Debt is a serious concern.

How about taxing the rich to help bring it down?

Government spending: How rising federal debt, deficit impact Americans

As we’ve already mentioned, rising debt and deficits can lead to higher interest rates. Higher interest rates mean it will cost more to borrow money to buy a house or a car, and paying for college tuition or starting your own business will become more expensive.

Higher interest rates also affect credit card purchases, so expenses like buying gas or groceries or even going on vacation will cost more.
Didn't say it wasn't a serious concern...But you said thet we could merely soak the rich and that would pay it all off...You obviously know absolutely nothing about economics.

Know nothing about economics?

Like Trump?

He's calling for such an idiocy of a Negative interest rate.

Even famed Austrian LIBERTARIAN Nobel prize winning economist Friedrich Hayek, had warned of low interest rates causing boom, and busts, much like what happened under W. Bush.

Even famed Austrian LIBERTARIAN Nobel prize winning economist Friedrich Hayek, had warned of low interest rates causing boom, and busts, much like what happened under W. Bush.

Obama had a Fed Funds under 0.25% for his first 7 years in office, where was his boom?

The economy fell apart under Dumbya Bush.


No, it fell apart when the democrat party forced banks to make loans to people who couldn't pay them back........
 
The spending never got cut.

You can't say something has failed when you never tried it.

you got that right>
debt.jpg

~S~
Red herring.


Note that all those bars go up...Who increased the debt more is irrelevant to the fact that no spending was ever cut.

BTW, that chart is wrong....Obama increased the debt by 100+%
 

Forum List

Back
Top