Teacher Wanting to Be on the Right Side of History Introduces 50 Shades of Gray Wordsearch to Kids

[Silhouette]

The blacked out words are worse. Here's what the teacher knew and for some reason did not fear handing out in Jr. High class:

Posters on the previous page are playing at that this was not inappropriate to hand out (when the points are made that the teacher knew what s/he was doing when s/he handed them out and felt society would not rebuke him/her..)..

I can only imagine what the blacked out words said.. Gay "fisting" "joys of anal sex" federal education czar Kevin Jennings would approve. But would parents? Hard to tell since they weren't consulted beforehand. Welcome: the new norm..

 

[Montrovant]

The blacked out words are worse. Here's what the teacher knew and for some reason did not fear handing out in Jr. High class:

Posters on the previous page are playing at that this was not inappropriate to hand out (when the points are made that the teacher knew what s/he was doing when s/he handed them out and felt society would not rebuke him/her..)..

I can only imagine what the blacked out words said.. Gay "fisting" "joys of anal sex" federal education czar Kevin Jennings would approve. But would parents? Hard to tell since they weren't consulted beforehand. Welcome: the new norm..

I don't remember seeing anyone say that this was not inappropriate. I think you are, as usual, putting your own interpretation out as fact. That someone doesn't automatically agree with you that the teacher must have intentionally handed out the sheets does not mean they consider the sheets appropriate for middle school students.

 

[Silhouette]

I don't remember seeing anyone say that this was not inappropriate. I think you are, as usual, putting your own interpretation out as fact. That someone doesn't automatically agree with you that the teacher must have intentionally handed out the sheets does not mean they consider the sheets appropriate for middle school students.

Your post at the end of last page:

Merely having words that are sexual in nature, or appear sexual in nature in context, on a work sheet is not pornographic. There was nothing explicit in the words which were not blacked out. Suggestive, sure, but not to the level of pornography.

Inappropriate in that the content was obviously sexual in nature and not in an educational fashion. Bondage is not an appropriate subject for the average middle school classroom. That doesn't mean any mention of sex or bondage is automatically pornography.
.

 

[Montrovant]

I don't remember seeing anyone say that this was not inappropriate. I think you are, as usual, putting your own interpretation out as fact. That someone doesn't automatically agree with you that the teacher must have intentionally handed out the sheets does not mean they consider the sheets appropriate for middle school students.

Your post at the end of last page:

Merely having words that are sexual in nature, or appear sexual in nature in context, on a work sheet is not pornographic. There was nothing explicit in the words which were not blacked out. Suggestive, sure, but not to the level of pornography.

Inappropriate in that the content was obviously sexual in nature and not in an educational fashion. Bondage is not an appropriate subject for the average middle school classroom. That doesn't mean any mention of sex or bondage is automatically pornography.
.

My post which says the material is inappropriate but not pornographic? How is that someone saying the material is not inappropriate?

 

[Silhouette]

Better question: What makes it inappropriate (if not pornographic)? I'll wait for your answer.

 

[Montrovant]

Better question: What makes it inappropriate (if not pornographic)? I'll wait for your answer.

I've already given the answer, but sure, I'll do it again.

A worksheet with bondage or S&M references is not appropriate for middle school children. I think that is the kind of thing that requires a bit more maturity than the average middle schooler possesses. However, a puzzle with words about bondage or S&M is not automatically pornographic, either. It would need to be somewhat explicit before it fell into the realm of pornography.

So having intercourse, leather cuffs, and paddling on a worksheet are suggestive and inappropriate, but unless it gets more descriptive, something along the lines of, "He put the leather cuffs on her after the paddling, teasing her with the promise of intercourse" it isn't enough to be porn. Even that is probably on the fence.

And as I also said before, what words are blanked out could change how I feel about the work sheet.

You still haven't answered how my post, in which I said the work sheet was inappropriate, is an example of someone saying the work sheet is not inappropriate.

 

[Silhouette]

A worksheet with bondage or S&M references is not appropriate for middle school children. I think that is the kind of thing that requires a bit more maturity than the average middle schooler possesses. However, a puzzle with words about bondage or S&M is not automatically pornographic, either. It would need to be somewhat explicit before it fell into the realm of pornography.

So having intercourse, leather cuffs, and paddling on a worksheet are suggestive and inappropriate, but unless it gets more descriptive, something along the lines of, "He put the leather cuffs on her after the paddling, teasing her with the promise of intercourse" it isn't enough to be porn. Even that is probably on the fence...

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

 

[Montrovant]

A worksheet with bondage or S&M references is not appropriate for middle school children. I think that is the kind of thing that requires a bit more maturity than the average middle schooler possesses. However, a puzzle with words about bondage or S&M is not automatically pornographic, either. It would need to be somewhat explicit before it fell into the realm of pornography.

So having intercourse, leather cuffs, and paddling on a worksheet are suggestive and inappropriate, but unless it gets more descriptive, something along the lines of, "He put the leather cuffs on her after the paddling, teasing her with the promise of intercourse" it isn't enough to be porn. Even that is probably on the fence...

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

This has already been answered, but no, it's not appropriate. Of course, since you haven't shown any evidence that such is happening, I don't really see the relevance of the question.

 

[Silhouette]

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

This has already been answered, but no, it's not appropriate. Of course, since you haven't shown any evidence that such is happening, I don't really see the relevance of the question.

ie: you won't answer the direct question. Because as you already know and have seen quoted and linked in this thread, gay education czar Kevin Jennings had such "courses" foisted upon children in the US as part of his "life's work" in educating young people..

...Harvey Milk, pedophile and gay-icon would most definitely approve of Jennings' life work and grooming techniques/education of children thusly. BTW, have you bought any of those Harvey Milk federal US postage stamps yet with the rainbow "USA" logo on them?...

 

[Montrovant]

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

This has already been answered, but no, it's not appropriate. Of course, since you haven't shown any evidence that such is happening, I don't really see the relevance of the question.

ie: you won't answer the direct question. Because as you already know and have seen quoted and linked in this thread, gay education czar Kevin Jennings had such "courses" foisted upon children in the US as part of his "life's work" in educating young people..

...Harvey Milk, pedophile and gay-icon would most definitely approve of Jennings' life work and grooming techniques/education of children thusly. BTW, have you bought any of those Harvey Milk federal US postage stamps yet with the rainbow "USA" logo on them?...

Except that I DID answer the direct question, you nitwit. That you would respond to a post in which I answer your question by claiming I won't answer your question shows just how foolish your posts are.

 

[Silhouette]

A worksheet with bondage or S&M references is not appropriate for middle school children. I think that is the kind of thing that requires a bit more maturity than the average middle schooler possesses. However, a puzzle with words about bondage or S&M is not automatically pornographic, either. It would need to be somewhat explicit before it fell into the realm of pornography.

So having intercourse, leather cuffs, and paddling on a worksheet are suggestive and inappropriate, but unless it gets more descriptive, something along the lines of, "He put the leather cuffs on her after the paddling, teasing her with the promise of intercourse" it isn't enough to be porn. Even that is probably on the fence...

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

Stil waiting for the answer to that question..

 

[Montrovant]

A worksheet with bondage or S&M references is not appropriate for middle school children. I think that is the kind of thing that requires a bit more maturity than the average middle schooler possesses. However, a puzzle with words about bondage or S&M is not automatically pornographic, either. It would need to be somewhat explicit before it fell into the realm of pornography.

So having intercourse, leather cuffs, and paddling on a worksheet are suggestive and inappropriate, but unless it gets more descriptive, something along the lines of, "He put the leather cuffs on her after the paddling, teasing her with the promise of intercourse" it isn't enough to be porn. Even that is probably on the fence...

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

Stil waiting for the answer to that question..

No, you are not.

A worksheet with bondage or S&M references is not appropriate for middle school children. I think that is the kind of thing that requires a bit more maturity than the average middle schooler possesses. However, a puzzle with words about bondage or S&M is not automatically pornographic, either. It would need to be somewhat explicit before it fell into the realm of pornography.

So having intercourse, leather cuffs, and paddling on a worksheet are suggestive and inappropriate, but unless it gets more descriptive, something along the lines of, "He put the leather cuffs on her after the paddling, teasing her with the promise of intercourse" it isn't enough to be porn. Even that is probably on the fence...

Would you say that teaching "fisting" or "the joys of anal sex" to youngsters of that age is appropriate? (Remember, the cases of HIV in the youngest group of "gay"/experimenting boys has been skyrocketing since the start of all this neo fad)

Yes or no?

This has already been answered, but no, it's not appropriate. Of course, since you haven't shown any evidence that such is happening, I don't really see the relevance of the question.

Are you illiterate, too?

 

[Silhouette]

So you won't answer the question about whether or not you believe that teaching "fisting" or the "joys of anal sex" to minors is appropriate. OK. I understand why you don't want to touch that one with a 10 foot pole. Because if you did, then we'd be talking about the inappropriate example that the (currently serving) gay education czar Kevin Jennings has potentially set that might have led this teacher to feel it was OK to pass out 50 shades of gray word search to students in his/her class..

 

[Montrovant]

So you won't answer the question about whether or not you believe that teaching "fisting" or the "joys of anal sex" to minors is appropriate. OK. I understand why you don't want to touch that one with a 10 foot pole. Because if you did, then we'd be talking about the inappropriate example that the (currently serving) gay education czar Kevin Jennings has potentially set that might have led this teacher to feel it was OK to pass out 50 shades of gray word search to students in his/her class..

Actually, I've already answered that question multiple times, and just quoted my answer to it in the previous post. This is why I asked if you are illiterate; perhaps you are simply unable to read my answers?

AGAIN, no, it's not appropriate.

And again, while it is possible that the teacher involved took a queue from Kevin Jennings, you certainly have not provided any evidence whatsoever that that is the case.

 

[Silhouette]

I would say that any teacher would look to the education CZAR of the United States of America as to what was permissable and what wasn't in a given curriculum, wouldn't you? Fair to say?

 

[emilynghiem]

So you won't answer the question about whether or not you believe that teaching "fisting" or the "joys of anal sex" to minors is appropriate. OK. I understand why you don't want to touch that one with a 10 foot pole. Because if you did, then we'd be talking about the inappropriate example that the (currently serving) gay education czar Kevin Jennings has potentially set that might have led this teacher to feel it was OK to pass out 50 shades of gray word search to students in his/her class..

None of that is proper, but that doesn't mean it was connected
with whatever or whoever was involved in the photocopying of the word search in THIS CASE.

Silhouette if you are going to attack the whole Hydra at the base,
do what paulitician was saying and get the whole school system out from bureaucratic govt
and back in the hands of the local communities to fund and run themselves.

Then none of this would come up!
I AGREE!

 

[Montrovant]

I would say that any teacher would look to the education CZAR of the United States of America as to what was permissable and what wasn't in a given curriculum, wouldn't you? Fair to say?

Actually, no. I don't think so. I can't give evidence either way, but I would guess that many teachers either don't even know who Jennings is, or pay little to no attention to him. A great deal of schooling is taken care of at the local level rather than the federal.

 

[Silhouette]

I would say that any teacher would look to the education CZAR of the United States of America as to what was permissable and what wasn't in a given curriculum, wouldn't you? Fair to say?

Actually, no. I don't think so. I can't give evidence either way, but I would guess that many teachers either don't even know who Jennings is, or pay little to no attention to him. A great deal of schooling is taken care of at the local level rather than the federal.

I'd like you to weigh in on why this teacher thought it would be a good idea to pass out word search material on sexual deviant/bondage activities to Jr. High kids then..

 

[Montrovant]

I would say that any teacher would look to the education CZAR of the United States of America as to what was permissable and what wasn't in a given curriculum, wouldn't you? Fair to say?

Actually, no. I don't think so. I can't give evidence either way, but I would guess that many teachers either don't even know who Jennings is, or pay little to no attention to him. A great deal of schooling is taken care of at the local level rather than the federal.

I'd like you to weigh in on why this teacher thought it would be a good idea to pass out word search material on sexual deviant/bondage activities to Jr. High kids then..

Assuming the teacher actually "thought it would be a good idea to pass out word search material on sexual deviant/bondage activities to Jr. High kids", perhaps they were acting on some of their own sexual deviance. Perhaps they were trying to 'get back' at someone through the act. Perhaps they simply aren't that bright. You've latched onto this idea that the influence of Kevin Jennings is the only possible reason these work sheets were handed out. It's pretty clear that isn't because the idea has great merit, but rather because you can then use it to try and further your anti-homosexual arguments.

You don't like gays. We get it. Everything bad that happens is not somehow related to homosexuality.

 

[Silhouette]

A cult is a cult...if the shoe fits..