TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
Another one of you numerous appeal to authority logical fallacies. " I said it so it's true" end of storyBeen over that. I think discrimination requires more than simply refusing someone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another one of you numerous appeal to authority logical fallacies. " I said it so it's true" end of storyBeen over that. I think discrimination requires more than simply refusing someone.
Marriage and attending conventions are not sins. They are entittlesd to believe that sex outside of marriage to one person of the opposit sex is a sin. However, you are not entittled to decide for others what is acceptable behavior, and you are not being forced to participate unless they rip off your clothes and jump your bones. Sin is a primitive concept born of fear and superstition intended by those in power to control others, particularly women.Bible says you shouldn't commit sins, and using your labor to help someone commit a sin would be wrong also. Just like baking a cake for a swingers convention would be helping someone commit a sin, ot baking a cake for porn convention, or using your labor to help any other person to do something that would be considered a sin.
I'm not ruling anyone out, I'm applying this standard across the board. If it's a sin, the bible says you should not be a part of it.
I too am tired of it, because I can only think of so many ways to say the same things, it's getting repetitive.Same horseshit different post. Gays will get married and swingers will have conventions with or without tye damned cake. A of them will have their preferred type of sex with or without the cake. Wghoever providesa cake is not participating in or facilitating the sex act. I am really getting tired of this game
Ok, so discrimination is refusing anyone any service for any reason? Correct? Nobody can refuse service to anyone?Another one of you numerous appeal to authority logical fallacies. " I said it so it's true" end of story
Marriage and attending conventions are not sins. They are entittlesd to believe that sex outside of marriage to one person of the opposit sex is a sin. However, you are not entittled to decide for others what is acceptable behavior, and you are not being forced to participate unless they rip off your clothes and jump your bones. Sin is a primitive concept born of fear and superstition intended by those in power to control others, particularly women.
Marriage and attending conventions are not sins.
However, you are not entittled to decide for others what is acceptable behavior,
Sin is a primitive concept born of fear and superstition intended by those in power to control others, particularly women.
Gay marriage and a swingers convention would be sins, according to the Bible.
Sin is an excuse for trying to control and marginalize others. But hey! It's used against your own kind as well and even works better when you do!They are not deciding what is acceptable for anyone, they are deciding what us acceptable for themselves, and that us refusing to help someone else commit a sin.
Sin is a clever invention by men inorder to control women, children and others with guilt and fear of the unknown.There is more evidence of your anti religion stance.
Don't be disingenuous. The bible speaks against homosexuality, and it also speaks of having sex outside of marriage, adultery, fornication.![]()
I doubt that your bible says anything about "gay marriage, " and I'm pretty damned sure that it does not say anything about "swingers conventions". That is somewhere between stupid and hilarious!
Ok, you believe that, but you do realize that hundreds of millions of people across the world believe in a God,.or a religion of some sort. Everyone has their own concept of sin. It's apparent others do not believe it's man made.Sin is a clever invention by men inorder to control women, children and others with guilt and fear of the unknown.
Also, how did this become about controlling women lol. Applies to everyone.Sin is a clever invention by men inorder to control women, children and others with guilt and fear of the unknown.
Don't be disingenuous.
You should know by now how much I don't give a shit. But the fact remains that marriage and sex are two different things. So the bakers hissy fit about participating in a sin does not hold water.Don't be disingenuous. The bible speaks against homosexuality, and it also speaks of having sex outside of marriage, adultery, fornication.
Thank you for admitting that sin is used to control peopleAlso, how did this become about controlling women lol. Applies to everyone.
You should know by now how much I don't give a shit. But the fact remains that marriage and sex are two different things. So the bakers hissy fit about participating in a sin does not hold water.
So what?. That negations nothing that I have saidOk, you believe that, but you do realize that hundreds of millions of people across the world believe in a God,.or a religion of some sort. Everyone has their own concept of sin. It's apparent others do not believe it's man made.
You should know by now how much I don't give a shit. But the fact remains that marriage and sex are two different things. So the bakers hissy fit about participating in a sin does not hold water.
You should know by now how much I don't give a shit
So the bakers hissy fit about participating in a sin does not hold water.
I didn't admit anything. I merely asked why you went to "it's about controlling women", when the rules of sin apply to everyone.Thank you for admitting that sin is used to control people
Of course not. There's no convincing you. You've already made it clear, more than once, that religious freedoms are irrelevant to you, you don't even consider them. There is nothing anyone could ever say that would make you change your mind. I realize that, which makes this entire conversation pointless, really.So what?. That negations nothing that I have said
The same is true of you. I agree. There is no point. But for the record, you are grossly misrepresenting me when you say that religious freedoms are irrelevant to me. As much as I think that religion does more harm than good, I support the right of everyone to practice their religion free of fear for doing so BUT-and the big BUT that you don't get is that they must excercise that freedom without encroaching on the freedome of others-including the freedom to be free FROM religion and to not have religion weilded at them as a weapon or as an excuse to discriminateOf course not. There's no convincing you. You've already made it clear, more than once, that religious freedoms are irrelevant to you, you don't even consider them. There is nothing anyone could ever say that would make you change your mind. I realize that, which makes this entire conversation pointless, really.