Elaborate. What is Florida doing to gay people? Are you referring to their bill to keep sexually explicit material from 6th graders?Florida
Show me some actual discrimination...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Elaborate. What is Florida doing to gay people? Are you referring to their bill to keep sexually explicit material from 6th graders?Florida
You re so pathetically confused! You don't seem to understand tah there are two sperate issues here. Let me try to help
1. The current issue is that there are 27 states that do not provide certain protections against various forms of discrimination OTHER THAN the right to marry. Regardless of why, and regardless of what the feds have or have not done, that remains a fact-plain and simple. The botton line is that AT THIS TIME they allow discrimination! \
2. You are referring to a time when "they can start to discriminate" and from yiur previous posts that seems to mean the time when Obergefell might be overturned, That has NOTHING to do with discrimination in those other areas. What are you doing? Trying to convince me that you are stupid? You're doing a good job of that
The botton line is that AT THIS TIME they allow discrimination! \
Really? You really think they are going to say "sex" is inclusive for sexual orientation for employment, but in any other circumstance say "nope, it doesn't mean that HERE"?You're just making that shit up. Another point scored for convincing me that you are stupid
I said list the states that are discriminating against gay people...you've pointed to 27 states that haven't updated their civil rights acts, but that doesn't mean they are discriminating against people. Show me the states that are actually, currently discriminating against them.Holy fucking shit! After all of this you are asking me that again?? There is something seriously wrong with you!! Did you forgt those 27 states already? You are really racking up those stupid points.
Or, You are a discrimination denier. You know that there is discrimination but will not admit it. It is a ploy to try to convince people that there is no problem and that there is nothing to worry about, when you know damned well that is a lie. That is actually worse that those who are overt and unabashed bigots who promote discrimination. At least they are honest.
Do you think that if obergefell were to be overturned that discrimination would start taking place? That companies would say "sorry, we can't hire you because you're gay", and the courts would allow that? What discrimination is it exactly that you think is going to happen? My gosh man, we're not in 1960, this is 2022, gay life is the norm, states are not going to allow discrimination.
Gays would be banned from adopting children in the Bible Belt
Cruz is right. That's not the job of the Supreme Court
-------------------------------------Ted Cruz Says SCOTUS 'Clearly Wrong' to Legalize Gay Marriage
"Obergefell, like Roe v. Wade, ignored two centuries of our nation's history," the Republican senator said.www.newsweek.com
I just knew it would come up soon.
The majority of some states' people read and obey their Bibles which are quite specific about family bonds that produce children. A lot of the people coming over the border practice their faith's prescriptions in such matters.In a minute…
Bible Belt states would either ban gay marriage or substitute some form of Domestic Partnership
The TRUMPCourt would allow business to declare religious objections to gay employees. We don’t serve gays would become commonplace for religious reasons
Gays would be banned from adopting children in the Bible Belt
You are free to maintain your Biblical viewsThe majority of some states' people read and obey their Bibles which are quite specific about family bonds that produce children. A lot of the people coming over the border practice their faith's prescriptions in such matters.
You are free to maintain your Biblical views
You are not free to force them on others
poink?????????????????? are we playing ping pong?What "if" did I ignore? If they were "normal" ? I tried to school you on why and how that is completely Irrelevant for legal purposes. It is subjective crap.
Your position-that the ruling on same sex marrige was inproper- in neither logical or constitutional. I clearly demonstrated why.
You seem to think that know more about constitutional law than dozens of fedeal judges as well as a majority if the Supreme Court.
You still have not explaided the decrepancy that I pointed out above. You seem to have painted yourself into a corner. You have got to poick one position
But you on the left try to force your beliefs on everyone else every day. pot meet kettle, fricken hypocrites.You are free to maintain your Biblical views
You are not free to force them on others
your ignorance on display once again, nothing in your post has any semblance of truth.In a minute…
Bible Belt states would either ban gay marriage or substitute some form of Domestic Partnership
The TRUMPCourt would allow business to declare religious objections to gay employees. We don’t serve gays would become commonplace for religious reasons
Gays would be banned from adopting children in the Bible Belt
their hypocrisy is well established.And yet you support the right of the lowest of sexual perverts to force their “views” on others, including young children.
?your ignorance on display once again, nothing in your post has any semblance of truth.
All I said was: The majority of some states' people read and obey their Bibles which are quite specific about family bonds that produce children. A lot of the people coming over the border practice their faith's prescriptions in such matters.You are free to maintain your Biblical views
You are not free to force them on others
That is actually bullshit besides being totally irrelevent to the legal argument against gay marriageit is an aberration that is not seen in any animals except humans. Yes, some animals display both sexes and some engage in homosexual like activities. But you never see two male mammals or two female mammals pairing off except in humans.
You are totally full of shit! You cant " believe strongly that they should not suffer discrimination of any kind." and then keep bleating about this biology crap as justifcation for claiming the the Obergefell ruling was wrong. The courts have viewed homosexuality as innate and immutable. The question of why people are gay is irrelevent. Periodpoink?????????????????? are we playing ping pong?
my position is clear and based on biology. homosexuality is not a normal biological condition, it is an aberration that is not seen in any animals except humans. Yes, some animals display both sexes and some engage in homosexual like activities. But you never see two male mammals or two female mammals pairing off except in humans. You can rationalize it and try to call in normal, but its not. I feel empathy for those afflicted with homosexuality and believe strongly that they should not suffer discrimination of any kind. But you on the left must at some very basic level agree that homosexual behavior in humans is not biologically normal.
In a minute…
Bible Belt states would either ban gay marriage or substitute some form of Domestic Partnership
The TRUMPCourt would allow business to declare religious objections to gay employees. We don’t serve gays would become commonplace for religious reasons
Gays would be banned from adopting children in the Bible Belt
Bible Belt states would either ban gay marriage or substitute some form of Domestic Partnership
The TRUMPCourt would allow business to declare religious objections to gay employees. We don’t serve gays would become commonplace for religious reasons
The TRUMPCourt has moved past Abortion and is now centering on Religious Liberty.Again, as I've told PP, I highly doubt this, but it's a very opinionated idea, because we're not going to agree on this.
If it were a sincerely held religious belief, maybe, but in general, that wouldn't work. take masterpiece bakery, for example. They won the case, but what was being requested was specific. The bakery said they would have sold any already prepared cake. Had they just outright refused service, period, would they have won that case?