Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

[Uncensored2008]

The murderer is a dedicated trump supporter and as such is and was allowed to ignore laws and murder folks.

DERP

did the average IQ in this thread just drop by 70 points?

Oh, hi cramps.

Tell me you vile terrorist supporter - two of three of your fellow terrorists had hand guns and pointed them at Kyle.

When someone points a gun at you, do you have "a duty to die?" Sanctioned riot or not, this is self-defense.

 

[Camp]

The murdering teen was part of a well-regulared militia and hence had authority for killing people.

 

[Uncensored2008]

so it doesn't matter to you that he was breaking WI gun laws?

If so, he was one of 10,000 law breakers in the area. He was the one defending lives and property - which law distortion REFUSED to do.

So you don't care if people break the law as long as someone else is breaking the law at the same time.

Got it.

I care about justice - ONE MAN supported justice while paid police did nothing.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The murdering teen was part of a well-regulared militia and hence had authority for killing people.

You're dumb as all fuck, but actually hit it on the head.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Joseph D. Rosenbaum served 12.5 YEARS in prison for CHILD RAPE:

Are you sure it's the same guy? I'm starting to wonder now..

If he was in prison in AZ until 2017, then he couldn't have been living in Waco and then moved to Silver Lake, WI.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

READ:

^^^^ The sentence ran from December 2002-June 2013, so he served 11 YEARS and 6 MONTHS of his 12.5 YEAR sentence, they then released him with a monitor device on, which it says he interfered with and was given another 2.5 YEAR sentence that ran from July 2014-August 2016.

 

[Blues Man]

so it doesn't matter to you that he was breaking WI gun laws?

If so, he was one of 10,000 law breakers in the area. He was the one defending lives and property - which law distortion REFUSED to do.

So you don't care if people break the law as long as someone else is breaking the law at the same time.

Got it.

I care about justice - ONE MAN supported justice while paid police did nothing.

He was not supporting justice by breaking gun laws.

 

[martybegan]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

The DEAD guy who attacked him with a skateboard was guilty of assault, though he will never be indicted / charged now. The terrorists destroying the car dealership violated the law and instigated the entire thing.

If you decide to destroy someone's business and end up getting shot while doing it, don't bitch afterwards about how YOUR rights were violated and laws were broken.

It was not his business.

This kid was breaking the law. The same laws you criticize others for breaking.

Not the same laws.

By carrying open he was breaking a procedural law, one who's breaking results in zero harm to anyone or society.

Destroying people's property and assaulting people are not procedural issues.

That you try to equate the two shows your utter dishonesty.

And again, as always, go fuck yourself.

Which procedural law? Open carry is allowed in Wisconsin. A free man has the right to carry a rifle openly in Wisconsin.

Moe than likely his is quibbling about the age of the guy, and that he brought the weapon across state lines.

Procedural bullshit.

 

[Godboy]

That's what happens when mayors and governors don't stop the riots, people defend their property....using....
Self-Defense and the Castle Doctrine
Wisconsin law allows deadly force in self-defense in the limited circumstances where the person defending themselves “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm” to their person.

Wisconsin Court Clarifies New Self-Defense Rule | Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown, LLP

A Wisconsin court's recent ruling could affect defendants who claim self-defense when facing criminal charges. Call a Milwaukee defense lawyer to learn more.

www.grgblaw.com

does that apply to riot tourists?

It applies to anyone in that state. Do you not know how laws work?

so anyone can go to a protest with a gun, then feel threatened and shoot people? cool

Yes.

 

[martybegan]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

Procedural bullshit.

People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.

It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.

Maybe the rioters should visit your property.

It was not his property.

He was acting illegally as armed security.

At the point of the attack he was defending himself.

What the hell is even illegal armed security?

Can you point out that law?

 

[Blues Man]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

The DEAD guy who attacked him with a skateboard was guilty of assault, though he will never be indicted / charged now. The terrorists destroying the car dealership violated the law and instigated the entire thing.

If you decide to destroy someone's business and end up getting shot while doing it, don't bitch afterwards about how YOUR rights were violated and laws were broken.

It was not his business.

This kid was breaking the law. The same laws you criticize others for breaking.

Not the same laws.

By carrying open he was breaking a procedural law, one who's breaking results in zero harm to anyone or society.

Destroying people's property and assaulting people are not procedural issues.

That you try to equate the two shows your utter dishonesty.

And again, as always, go fuck yourself.

Which procedural law? Open carry is allowed in Wisconsin. A free man has the right to carry a rifle openly in Wisconsin.

Moe than likely his is quibbling about the age of the guy, and that he brought the weapon across state lines.

Procedural bullshit.

So quibbling about protesters who cross state lines and break the law is nothing but procedural bullshit too right?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws

Must not matter to you that others were trying to kill him.

 

[JoeB131]

No jail time? I just posted the RECORD where it clearly says he served a 12.5 YEAR sentence in an Arizona prison. So a 12 and a half year prison sentence. But you defending CHILD RAPISTS is FULLY NOTED.

Well, first, we don't know if it is the same guy... it probably isn't. The guy who was killed on Tuesday is 36 and has a 2 year old daughter.

The guy in that record is clearly a LOT older than 18 in 2002, which is what the person would have been.

So you guys essentially scoured the records for someone with a similar name, and this is what you came up with.

 

[Blues Man]

So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.

No jury is going to convict him.

Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.


Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT

View attachment 380602

He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.

If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite

Procedural bullshit.

People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.

It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.

Maybe the rioters should visit your property.

It was not his property.

He was acting illegally as armed security.

At the point of the attack he was defending himself.

What the hell is even illegal armed security?

Can you point out that law?

I already linked to WI gun laws.

Anyone under 18 cannot legally carry a firearm in public.

If a person under 18 is acting as protection of a public business while carrying a firearm in WI he is doing so illegally.

If the owner of the business hired a 17 tear old to carry a gun on his property he would be breaking the law by illegally hiring a minor to act as armed security. If the minor proclaimed that it was his job to protect a business that someone else owned while carrying a firearm he was acting as illegal armed security.

This is not high level reasoning

 

[JoeB131]

^^^^ The sentence ran from December 2002-June 2013, so he served 11 YEARS and 6 MONTHS of his 12.5 YEAR sentence, they then released him with a monitor device on, which it says he interfered with and was given another 2.5 YEAR sentence that ran from July 2014-August 2016.

Which again, tells me it's probably not the same guy... just someone with the same name.

This guy was from Arizona.... the guy who was killed on Tuesday was from Texas.

 

[cnm]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon

Yet there are three people shot. Were the two shown in the image trying to apprehend him for a previous shooting?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The murderer is a dedicated trump supporter and as such is and was allowed to ignore laws and murder folks.

 

[elektra]

sadly, unless he was defending his home, he has no business going to a riot with an AR-15. A prosecutor will have no problem he took the assault rifle to a riot with the intent to murder someone.

 

[Blues Man]

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon




CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'

Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!

'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'

No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.

Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws

Must not matter to you that others were trying to kill him.

If he obeyed the law no one would have been trying to kill him.

It was his action of breaking the law that put him in jeopardy.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

No jail time? I just posted the RECORD where it clearly says he served a 12.5 YEAR sentence in an Arizona prison. So a 12 and a half year prison sentence. But you defending CHILD RAPISTS is FULLY NOTED.

Well, first, we don't know if it is the same guy... it probably isn't. The guy who was killed on Tuesday is 36 and has a 2 year old daughter.

The guy in that record is clearly a LOT older than 18 in 2002, which is what the person would have been.

So you guys essentially scoured the records for someone with a similar name, and this is what you came up with.

Anyone with eyes can clearly see it's the SAME person:

 

[hadit]

This whole thing was so predictable from the beginning. The left has for decades been accustomed to holding violent protests, burning things, assaulting people, damaging property, etc, with little or no repercussions. In fact, they have a sympathetic media that focuses more on their cause than their actions. This level of on-going and increasing violence, however, has finally caused a counter reaction. Property owners and innocent bystanders have realized that the official power structure is not going to protect them and they are starting to fight back. I said that it wouldn't be long before these thugs went after somebody that was armed and willing to defend himself, and people would die, and now it has. This won't stop here, either, because the violent protesters have no intention of stopping their violence and will only increase it because they still believe there are a lot of soft targets that won't fight back. The counter reaction will only increase, as it becomes ever more apparent that protection is not to be found. This only stops when the protesters stop being violent.

You can argue that this kid broke the law himself, that he should not have been on the streets with a rifle, but when the police are pulled back, who is going to enforce the laws that the kid broke? The flip side of the argument, of course, is that without the violent protesters in the streets, the kid would never have been walking around carrying an AR-15. Think of how foolish it is for the protesters to, on the one hand, scream that the police need to be defunded and disbanded, while on the other, want those same police to protect them from the inevitable results of their actions.